Car comparison

Chevrolet Equinox III 550TvsJeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) · Facelift 2017 3.0 V6 MultiJet

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Chevrolet Equinox III

550T

260 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2021
VS

Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) · Facelift 2017

3.0 V6 MultiJet

250 hp2987 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Chevrolet Equinox III 550T

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    220 km/h
    137 mph Unrestricted
    210 km/h
    130 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    260 hp
    194 kW
  • Lightest
    1,710 kg
    3,770 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    152 hp/t
    113 kW/t
    6.6 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    62/100
  • Best performance score
    52/100
  • Best economy score
    85/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelChevroletEquinox III550TJeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20173.0 V6 MultiJet
Power
260hp194kW
250hp186kW
Torque
353Nm260lb-ft
570Nm420lb-ft
Curb weight
1,710kg3,770lb
2,498kg5,507lb
Gross weight-
2,949kg6,501lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
202 km/h
126 mph
To 99% top speed
80.6s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
102.8s99% target: 200 km/h / 124 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.8s
8.2s
0-200 km/h
38.0s
Calculated
103.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.4s
Calculated
7.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK
8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.7s
Calculated
16.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
152hp/t113kW/t69hp/1000 lb
Calculated
100hp/t75kW/t45hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
206Nm/t138lb-ft/ton
Calculated
228Nm/t153lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
711km442mi
Calculated
1,169km726mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
2,987cc182cu in
Length
4,652mm183in
4,828mm190in
Width
1,843mm73in
1,943mm76in
Height
1,693mm67in
1,802mm71in
Wheelbase
2,725mm107in
2,915mm115in
Front track
1,573mm62in
1,628mm64in
Rear track
1,585mm62in
1,634mm64in
Ground clearance-
270mm11in
Trunk volume
431L
800L
Max trunk volume
1,505L
1,689L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
59L
94L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Chevrolet Equinox III 550TJeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 3.0 V6 MultiJetPowerTorque
  • Chevrolet Equinox III 550T: Power / Torque
  • Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 3.0 V6 MultiJet: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
ChevroletEquinox III550T5,500 rpm2,000-5,300 rpm5,750 rpm
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20173.0 V6 MultiJet3,600 rpm2,000 rpm4,800 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricChevroletEquinox III550TJeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20173.0 V6 MultiJet
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.4 s
7.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.8 s
8.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
38.0 s
103.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
202 km/h
126 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.2 s
13.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.7 s
16.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
147 km/h
92 mph
137 km/h
85 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chevrolet Equinox III 550T has 10 hp more than Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 3.0 V6 MultiJet.

The biggest power difference is between Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 3.0 V6 MultiJet and Chevrolet Equinox III 550T: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletEquinox III550T
353 Nm
260 lb-ft
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20173.0 V6 MultiJet
570 Nm
420 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletEquinox III550T
1,710 kg
3,770 lb
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20173.0 V6 MultiJet
2,498 kg
5,507 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletEquinox III550T
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20173.0 V6 MultiJet
202 km/h
126 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Chevrolet Equinox III 550T and Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 3.0 V6 MultiJet: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletEquinox III550T
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20173.0 V6 MultiJet
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletEquinox III550T
152 hp/t
113 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20173.0 V6 MultiJet
100 hp/t
75 kW/t
10.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletEquinox III550T
711 km
442 mi
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20173.0 V6 MultiJet
1,169 km
726 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
ChevroletEquinox III550T
260 hp
194 kW
7.8 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20173.0 V6 MultiJet
250 hp
186 kW
8.2 s
202 km/h
126 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
ChevroletEquinox III550T
Power
260 hp
194 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
431 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,652 mm
183.1 in
Height
1,693 mm
66.7 in
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20173.0 V6 MultiJet
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h8.2 s
Top speed
202 km/h
126 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
800 L
28.3 cu ft
Length
4,828 mm
190.1 in
Height
1,802 mm
70.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
ChevroletEquinox III550T
Power
260 hp
194 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20173.0 V6 MultiJet
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h8.2 s
Top speed
202 km/h
126 mph
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK

Chevrolet Equinox III 550T is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
ChevroletEquinox III550T
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
7.8 s
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20173.0 V6 MultiJet
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
8.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
ChevroletEquinox III550T
152 hp/t
113 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20173.0 V6 MultiJet
100 hp/t
75 kW/t
10.0 kg/hp
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleChevroletEquinox III550TJeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20173.0 V6 MultiJet
Power
260 hp
194 kW
250 hp
186 kW
Torque
353 Nm
260 lb-ft
570 Nm
420 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.8 s
8.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
202 km/h
126 mph
Lightness
1,710 kg
3,770 lb
2,498 kg
5,507 lb
Fuel consumption
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
431 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,652 mm
183.1 in
Height
1,693 mm
66.7 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
800 L
28.3 cu ft
Length
4,828 mm
190.1 in
Height
1,802 mm
70.9 in
Range score
711 km
442 mi
1,169 km
726 mi
Trunk score
431 L
15.2 cu ft
800 L
28.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
152 hp/t
113 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
100 hp/t
75 kW/t
10.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleChevrolet Equinox III 550TJeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 3.0 V6 MultiJet
Consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.53 LC100 km14.00 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi23.38 LC100 mi22.53 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,179 LC/year2,100 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Chevrolet Equinox III 550T

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Is 788 kg lighter
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 18 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 52 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk

Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 3.0 V6 MultiJet

  • Has 217 Nm more
  • Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 458 km (285 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 369 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Chevrolet Equinox III 550T
Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) 3.0 V6 MultiJet
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Chevrolet Equinox III 550T vs Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) · Facelift 2017 3.0 V6 MultiJet - car comparison - FastVsFaster