Car comparison

Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) · Facelift 2017 3.0 V6 MultiJetvsVolkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) · Facelift 2017

3.0 V6 MultiJet

250 hp2987 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2021
VS

Volkswagen Teramont

2.0 TSI

220 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 3.0 V6 MultiJet

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.2 s
  • Fastest top speed
    202 km/h
    126 mph
  • Most powerful
    250 hp
    186 kW
  • Highest torque
    570 Nm
    420 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.0 L/100 km
    29.4 mpg US
    35.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    9.8 L/100 km
    24.0 mpg US
    28.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.0 L/100 km
    33.6 mpg US
    40.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,169 km
    726 mi
  • Best overall score
    62/100
  • Best performance score
    48/100
  • Best economy score
    85/100
  • Best practicality score
    93/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20173.0 V6 MultiJetVolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI
Power
250hp186kW
220hp164kW
Torque
570Nm420lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
2,498kg5,507lb
2,060kg4,542lb
Gross weight
2,949kg6,501lb
2,670kg5,886lb
Top speed
202 km/h
126 mph
190 km/h
118 mph
To 99% top speed
102.8s99% target: 200 km/h / 124 mph
Calculated
82.9s99% target: 188 km/h / 117 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.2s
8.6s
0-200 km/h
103.1s
Calculated
-
0-60 mph
7.7s
Calculated
8.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK
9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK
12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.0s
Calculated
16.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
100hp/t75kW/t45hp/1000 lb
Calculated
107hp/t80kW/t48hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
228Nm/t153lb-ft/ton
Calculated
170Nm/t114lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,169km726mi
Calculated
745km463mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,987cc182cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,828mm190in
5,036mm198in
Width
1,943mm76in
1,989mm78in
Height
1,802mm71in
1,769mm70in
Wheelbase
2,915mm115in
2,979mm117in
Front track
1,628mm64in
-
Rear track
1,634mm64in
-
Ground clearance
270mm11in
203mm8in
Trunk volume
800L
-
Max trunk volume
1,689L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
94L
70L
CO2 emissions-
221g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 3.0 V6 MultiJetVolkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSIPowerTorque
  • Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 3.0 V6 MultiJet: Power / Torque
  • Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20173.0 V6 MultiJet3,600 rpm2,000 rpm4,800 rpm
VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI4,400-6,200 rpm1,500-4,400 rpm6,450 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20173.0 V6 MultiJetVolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.7 s
8.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.2 s
8.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
103.1 s
-
Top speed
202 km/h
126 mph
190 km/h
118 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
10.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.3 s
13.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.0 s
16.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
137 km/h
85 mph
135 km/h
84 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20173.0 V6 MultiJet
250 hp
186 kW
VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI
220 hp
164 kW

Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 3.0 V6 MultiJet has 30 hp more than Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI and Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 3.0 V6 MultiJet: 30 hp (22 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20173.0 V6 MultiJet
570 Nm
420 lb-ft
VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20173.0 V6 MultiJet
2,498 kg
5,507 lb
VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI
2,060 kg
4,542 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20173.0 V6 MultiJet
202 km/h
126 mph
VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI
190 km/h
118 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20173.0 V6 MultiJet8.2 s
VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI8.6 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 3.0 V6 MultiJet and Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20173.0 V6 MultiJet
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 3.0 V6 MultiJet and Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI: 1.4 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20173.0 V6 MultiJet
100 hp/t
75 kW/t
10.0 kg/hp
VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI
107 hp/t
80 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20173.0 V6 MultiJet
1,169 km
726 mi
VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI
745 km
463 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20173.0 V6 MultiJet
250 hp
186 kW
8.2 s
202 km/h
126 mph
VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI
220 hp
164 kW
8.6 s
190 km/h
118 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20173.0 V6 MultiJet
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h8.2 s
Top speed
202 km/h
126 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
800 L
28.3 cu ft
Length
4,828 mm
190.1 in
Height
1,802 mm
70.9 in
VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI
Power
220 hp
164 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
190 km/h
118 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
5,036 mm
198.3 in
Height
1,769 mm
69.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20173.0 V6 MultiJet
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h8.2 s
Top speed
202 km/h
126 mph
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI
Power
220 hp
164 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
190 km/h
118 mph
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK

Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 3.0 V6 MultiJet is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20173.0 V6 MultiJet
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
8.2 s
VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
8.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20173.0 V6 MultiJet
100 hp/t
75 kW/t
10.0 kg/hp
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI
107 hp/t
80 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20173.0 V6 MultiJetVolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI
Power
250 hp
186 kW
220 hp
164 kW
Torque
570 Nm
420 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.2 s
8.6 s
Top speed
202 km/h
126 mph
190 km/h
118 mph
Lightness
2,498 kg
5,507 lb
2,060 kg
4,542 lb
Fuel consumption
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
800 L
28.3 cu ft
Length
4,828 mm
190.1 in
Height
1,802 mm
70.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
5,036 mm
198.3 in
Height
1,769 mm
69.6 in
Range score
1,169 km
726 mi
745 km
463 mi
CO2 score
-
221 g/km
Trunk score
800 L
28.3 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
100 hp/t
75 kW/t
10.0 kg/hp
107 hp/t
80 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 3.0 V6 MultiJetVolkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI
Consumption8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.00 LC100 km16.45 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi22.53 LC100 mi26.47 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,100 LC/year2,468 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 3.0 V6 MultiJet

  • Has 30 hp more
  • Has 220 Nm more
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 424 km (264 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Heaviest

Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI

  • Is 438 kg lighter
  • Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) 3.0 V6 MultiJet
Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.0 V6 MultiJet
2.0 T5
VS
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20173.0 V6 MultiJetvsVolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
2.0 TSI
380TSI
VS
VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTeramontFacelift 2021380TSI
3.0 V6 MultiJet
300
VS
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20173.0 V6 MultiJetvsLexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
2.0 TSI
450TSI
VS
VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI
3.0 V6 MultiJet
2.0 T5
VS
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20173.0 V6 MultiJetvsVolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
2.0 TSI
380 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTalagon380 TSI
3.0 V6 MultiJet
550T
VS
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20173.0 V6 MultiJetvsChevroletEquinox III550T
2.0 TSI
380TSI
VS
VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTavendor380TSI
3.0 V6 MultiJet
2.0 D240
VS
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20173.0 V6 MultiJetvsJaguarE-Pace2.0 D240
2.0 TSI
380TSI
VS
VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTayron I380TSI
3.0 V6 MultiJet
25t
VS
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20173.0 V6 MultiJetvsJaguarF-Pace25t
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI
Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) · Facelift 2017 3.0 V6 MultiJet vs Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster