Car comparison

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5vsJeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) · Facelift 2017 3.0 V6 MultiJet

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo XC90 II

2.0 T5

250 hp1969 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2019
VS

Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) · Facelift 2017

3.0 V6 MultiJet

250 hp2987 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 3.0 V6 MultiJet

  • Highest torque
    570 Nm
    420 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.0 L/100 km
    29.4 mpg US
    35.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    9.8 L/100 km
    24.0 mpg US
    28.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.0 L/100 km
    33.6 mpg US
    40.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,169 km
    726 mi
  • Largest trunk
    800 L
  • Best overall score
    62/100
  • Best practicality score
    93/100

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    215 km/h
    134 mph
  • Most powerful
    250 hp
    186 kW
  • Lightest
    2,151 kg
    4,742 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    116 hp/t
    87 kW/t
    8.6 kg/hp
  • Best performance score
    48/100
  • Best economy score
    85/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoXC90 II2.0 T5JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20173.0 V6 MultiJet
Power
250hp186kW
250hp186kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
570Nm420lb-ft
Curb weight
2,151kg4,742lb
2,498kg5,507lb
Gross weight-
2,949kg6,501lb
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
202 km/h
126 mph
To 99% top speed
93.7s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
102.8s99% target: 200 km/h / 124 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.9s
8.2s
0-200 km/h
47.5s
Calculated
103.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.4s
Calculated
7.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK
8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK
9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.7s
Calculated
16.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
116hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb
Calculated
100hp/t75kW/t45hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
163Nm/t109lb-ft/ton
Calculated
228Nm/t153lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
877km545mi
Calculated
1,169km726mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
2,987cc182cu in
Length
4,950mm195in
4,828mm190in
Width
1,923mm76in
1,943mm76in
Height
1,776mm70in
1,802mm71in
Wheelbase
2,984mm117in
2,915mm115in
Front track
1,673mm66in
1,628mm64in
Rear track
1,675mm66in
1,634mm64in
Ground clearance
238mm9in
270mm11in
Trunk volume
314L
800L
Max trunk volume
1,886L
1,689L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
71L
94L
CO2 emissions
189g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 3.0 V6 MultiJetPowerTorque
  • Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
  • Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 3.0 V6 MultiJet: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T55,500 rpm1,800-4,800 rpm6,000 rpm
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20173.0 V6 MultiJet3,600 rpm2,000 rpm4,800 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoXC90 II2.0 T5JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20173.0 V6 MultiJet
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.4 s
7.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.9 s
8.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
47.5 s
103.1 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
202 km/h
126 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.2 s
13.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.7 s
16.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
143 km/h
89 mph
137 km/h
85 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
250 hp
186 kW
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20173.0 V6 MultiJet
250 hp
186 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20173.0 V6 MultiJet
570 Nm
420 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
2,151 kg
4,742 lb
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20173.0 V6 MultiJet
2,498 kg
5,507 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
215 km/h
134 mph
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20173.0 V6 MultiJet
202 km/h
126 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T57.9 s
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20173.0 V6 MultiJet8.2 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5 and Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 3.0 V6 MultiJet: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20173.0 V6 MultiJet
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
116 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20173.0 V6 MultiJet
100 hp/t
75 kW/t
10.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
877 km
545 mi
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20173.0 V6 MultiJet
1,169 km
726 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
250 hp
186 kW
7.9 s
215 km/h
134 mph
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20173.0 V6 MultiJet
250 hp
186 kW
8.2 s
202 km/h
126 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
314 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,950 mm
194.9 in
Height
1,776 mm
69.9 in
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20173.0 V6 MultiJet
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h8.2 s
Top speed
202 km/h
126 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
800 L
28.3 cu ft
Length
4,828 mm
190.1 in
Height
1,802 mm
70.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20173.0 V6 MultiJet
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h8.2 s
Top speed
202 km/h
126 mph
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
7.9 s
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20173.0 V6 MultiJet
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
8.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
116 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20173.0 V6 MultiJet
100 hp/t
75 kW/t
10.0 kg/hp
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoXC90 II2.0 T5JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20173.0 V6 MultiJet
Power
250 hp
186 kW
250 hp
186 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
570 Nm
420 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.9 s
8.2 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
202 km/h
126 mph
Lightness
2,151 kg
4,742 lb
2,498 kg
5,507 lb
Fuel consumption
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
314 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,950 mm
194.9 in
Height
1,776 mm
69.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
800 L
28.3 cu ft
Length
4,828 mm
190.1 in
Height
1,802 mm
70.9 in
Range score
877 km
545 mi
1,169 km
726 mi
CO2 score
189 g/km
-
Trunk score
314 L
11.1 cu ft
800 L
28.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
116 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
100 hp/t
75 kW/t
10.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo XC90 II 2.0 T5Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 3.0 V6 MultiJet
Consumption8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.17 LC100 km14.00 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi22.81 LC100 mi22.53 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,126 LC/year2,100 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5

  • Is 347 kg lighter
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk

Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 3.0 V6 MultiJet

  • Has 220 Nm more
  • Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 292 km (182 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 486 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5
Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) 3.0 V6 MultiJet
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 T5
4.4 V8
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5vsVolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8
3.0 V6 MultiJet
300
VS
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20173.0 V6 MultiJetvsLexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
2.0 T5
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5vsVolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
2.0 T5
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5vsVolvoXC402.0 T5
3.0 V6 MultiJet
550T
VS
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20173.0 V6 MultiJetvsChevroletEquinox III550T
2.0 T5
2.0 D240
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5vsJaguarE-Pace2.0 D240
3.0 V6 MultiJet
2.0 D5
VS
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20173.0 V6 MultiJetvsVolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
2.0 T5
25t
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5vsJaguarF-Pace25t
2.0 T5
2.0i
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5vsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
2.0 T5
GLS 350d
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5vsMercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 350d
3.0 V6 MultiJet
2.0 TSI
VS
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20173.0 V6 MultiJetvsVolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI
3.0 V6 MultiJet
450d V8
VS
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20173.0 V6 MultiJetvsLexusLX IIIFacelift 2015450d V8
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) · Facelift 2017 3.0 V6 MultiJet - car comparison - FastVsFaster