Car comparison

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 D240vsJeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) · Facelift 2017 3.0 V6 MultiJet

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar E-Pace

2.0 D240

240 hp1999 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2020
VS

Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) · Facelift 2017

3.0 V6 MultiJet

250 hp2987 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 D240

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    224 km/h
    139 mph
  • Lightest
    1,926 kg
    4,246 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    125 hp/t
    93 kW/t
    8.0 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.2 L/100 km
    37.9 mpg US
    45.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    7.2 L/100 km
    32.7 mpg US
    39.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.5 L/100 km
    42.8 mpg US
    51.4 mpg UK
  • Largest trunk
    1,234 L
  • Best overall score
    66/100
  • Best performance score
    54/100
  • Best economy score
    90/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarE-Pace2.0 D240JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20173.0 V6 MultiJet
Power
240hp179kW
250hp186kW
Torque
500Nm369lb-ft
570Nm420lb-ft
Curb weight
1,926kg4,246lb
2,498kg5,507lb
Gross weight
2,420kg5,335lb
2,949kg6,501lb
Top speed
224 km/h
139 mph
202 km/h
126 mph
To 99% top speed
89.9s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
102.8s99% target: 200 km/h / 124 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.4s
8.2s
0-200 km/h
37.3s
Calculated
103.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.0s
Calculated
7.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK
9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.4s
Calculated
16.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
100hp/t75kW/t45hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
260Nm/t174lb-ft/ton
Calculated
228Nm/t153lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
898km558mi
Calculated
1,169km726mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,999cc122cu in
2,987cc182cu in
Length
4,395mm173in
4,828mm190in
Width
1,984mm78in
1,943mm76in
Height
1,649mm65in
1,802mm71in
Wheelbase
2,681mm106in
2,915mm115in
Front track
1,635mm64in
1,628mm64in
Rear track
1,634mm64in
1,634mm64in
Ground clearance
204mm8in
270mm11in
Trunk volume
1,234L
800L
Max trunk volume
2,577L
1,689L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
56L
94L
CO2 emissions
162g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 D240Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 3.0 V6 MultiJetPowerTorque
  • Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 D240: Power / Torque
  • Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 3.0 V6 MultiJet: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarE-Pace2.0 D2404,000 rpm1,500 rpm4,250 rpm
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20173.0 V6 MultiJet3,600 rpm2,000 rpm4,800 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarE-Pace2.0 D240JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20173.0 V6 MultiJet
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.0 s
7.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.4 s
8.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
37.3 s
103.1 s
Top speed
224 km/h
139 mph
202 km/h
126 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.0 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.9 s
13.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.4 s
16.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
148 km/h
92 mph
137 km/h
85 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240
240 hp
179 kW
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20173.0 V6 MultiJet
250 hp
186 kW

Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 3.0 V6 MultiJet has 10 hp more than Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 D240.

The biggest power difference is between Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 D240 and Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 3.0 V6 MultiJet: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20173.0 V6 MultiJet
570 Nm
420 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240
1,926 kg
4,246 lb
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20173.0 V6 MultiJet
2,498 kg
5,507 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240
224 km/h
139 mph
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20173.0 V6 MultiJet
202 km/h
126 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Although Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 3.0 V6 MultiJet has more power, Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 D240 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 D240 and Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 3.0 V6 MultiJet: 0.8 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20173.0 V6 MultiJet
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 D240 and Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 3.0 V6 MultiJet: 1.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20173.0 V6 MultiJet
100 hp/t
75 kW/t
10.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240
898 km
558 mi
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20173.0 V6 MultiJet
1,169 km
726 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240
240 hp
179 kW
7.4 s
224 km/h
139 mph
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20173.0 V6 MultiJet
250 hp
186 kW
8.2 s
202 km/h
126 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
224 km/h
139 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
1,234 L
43.6 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,649 mm
64.9 in
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20173.0 V6 MultiJet
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h8.2 s
Top speed
202 km/h
126 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
800 L
28.3 cu ft
Length
4,828 mm
190.1 in
Height
1,802 mm
70.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
224 km/h
139 mph
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20173.0 V6 MultiJet
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h8.2 s
Top speed
202 km/h
126 mph
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 D240 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
7.4 s
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20173.0 V6 MultiJet
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
8.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20173.0 V6 MultiJet
100 hp/t
75 kW/t
10.0 kg/hp
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarE-Pace2.0 D240JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20173.0 V6 MultiJet
Power
240 hp
179 kW
250 hp
186 kW
Torque
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
570 Nm
420 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.4 s
8.2 s
Top speed
224 km/h
139 mph
202 km/h
126 mph
Lightness
1,926 kg
4,246 lb
2,498 kg
5,507 lb
Fuel consumption
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
1,234 L
43.6 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,649 mm
64.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
800 L
28.3 cu ft
Length
4,828 mm
190.1 in
Height
1,802 mm
70.9 in
Range score
898 km
558 mi
1,169 km
726 mi
CO2 score
162 g/km
-
Trunk score
1,234 L
43.6 cu ft
800 L
28.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
100 hp/t
75 kW/t
10.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar E-Pace 2.0 D240Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 3.0 V6 MultiJet
Consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.85 LC100 km14.00 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi17.46 LC100 mi22.53 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used930 L246 US gal205 UK gal1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,628 LC/year2,100 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 D240

  • Is 572 kg lighter
  • Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 22 km/h (14 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 25 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 434 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 D240
Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) 3.0 V6 MultiJet
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 D240 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) · Facelift 2017 3.0 V6 MultiJet - car comparison - FastVsFaster