Car comparison

Chevrolet Camaro IV · Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8vsHonda S2000 (AP1) 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Chevrolet Camaro IV · Facelift 1998

Z28 5.7 i V8

310 hp5665 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedCabriolet / convertible2001-2002
VS

Honda S2000 (AP1)

2.0

240 hp1997 ccGasolineRWDManualNaturally aspiratedCabriolet / convertible1999-2004

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.0 s
  • Fastest top speed
    257 km/h
    160 mph
  • Most powerful
    310 hp
    231 kW
  • Highest torque
    461 Nm
    340 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    193 hp/t
    144 kW/t
    5.2 kg/hp
  • Best estimated range
    512 km
    318 mi
  • Largest trunk
    215 L
  • Best overall score
    58/100
  • Best performance score
    65/100
  • Best practicality score
    42/100

Honda S2000 (AP1) 2.0

  • Lightest
    1,270 kg
    2,800 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    9.9 L/100 km
    23.8 mpg US
    28.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    13.2 L/100 km
    17.8 mpg US
    21.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.9 L/100 km
    29.8 mpg US
    35.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    235 g/km
  • Best economy score
    80/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0
Power
310hp231kW
240hp179kW
Torque
461Nm340lb-ft
208Nm153lb-ft
Curb weight
1,605kg3,538lb
1,270kg2,800lb
Gross weight
1,930kg4,255lb
1,535kg3,384lb
Top speed
257 km/h
160 mph
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
86.6s99% target: 254 km/h / 158 mph
Calculated
79.4s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.0s
6.2s
0-200 km/h
22.8s
Calculated
23.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.7s
Calculated
5.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK
9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK
13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK
7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.1s
Calculated
14.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
193hp/t144kW/t88hp/1000 lb
Calculated
189hp/t141kW/t86hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
287Nm/t192lb-ft/ton
Calculated
164Nm/t110lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
512km318mi
Calculated
505km314mi
Calculated
Displacement
5,665cc346cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,914mm193in
4,135mm163in
Width
1,882mm74in
1,750mm69in
Height
1,315mm52in
1,270mm50in
Wheelbase
2,568mm101in
2,400mm94in
Front track
1,542mm61in
1,470mm58in
Rear track
1,540mm61in
1,510mm59in
Ground clearance-
129mm5in
Trunk volume
215L
143L
Max trunk volume
930L
-
Doors
2
2
Seats
4
2
Fuel tank
64L
50L
CO2 emissions
293g/km
235g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8Honda S2000 (AP1) 2.0PowerTorque
  • Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8: Power / Torque
  • Honda S2000 (AP1) 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V85,200 rpm4,000 rpm5,450 rpm
HondaS2000 (AP1)2.08,300 rpm7,500 rpm8,550 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.7 s
5.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.0 s
6.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
22.8 s
23.5 s
Top speed
257 km/h
160 mph
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.1 s
6.2 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.2 s
9.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.9 s
12.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.1 s
14.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
163 km/h
101 mph
162 km/h
101 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
310 hp
231 kW
HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0
240 hp
179 kW

Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 has 70 hp more than Honda S2000 (AP1) 2.0.

The biggest power difference is between Honda S2000 (AP1) 2.0 and Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8: 70 hp (52 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
461 Nm
340 lb-ft
HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0
208 Nm
153 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
1,605 kg
3,538 lb
HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0
1,270 kg
2,800 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
257 km/h
160 mph
HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V86.0 s
HondaS2000 (AP1)2.06.2 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 and Honda S2000 (AP1) 2.0: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0
9.9 L/100 km
23.8 mpg US
28.5 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Honda S2000 (AP1) 2.0 and Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8: 2.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
193 hp/t
144 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp
HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0
189 hp/t
141 kW/t
5.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
512 km
318 mi
HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0
505 km
314 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
310 hp
231 kW
6.0 s
257 km/h
160 mph
HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0
240 hp
179 kW
6.2 s
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
Power
310 hp
231 kW
0-100 km/h6.0 s
Top speed
257 km/h
160 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
215 L
7.6 cu ft
Length
4,914 mm
193.5 in
Height
1,315 mm
51.8 in
HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h6.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
143 L
5.1 cu ft
Length
4,135 mm
162.8 in
Height
1,270 mm
50.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
Power
310 hp
231 kW
0-100 km/h6.0 s
Top speed
257 km/h
160 mph
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h6.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
9.9 L/100 km
23.8 mpg US
28.5 mpg UK

Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
6.0 s
HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0
9.9 L/100 km
23.8 mpg US
28.5 mpg UK
6.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
193 hp/t
144 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0
189 hp/t
141 kW/t
5.3 kg/hp
9.9 L/100 km
23.8 mpg US
28.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0
Power
310 hp
231 kW
240 hp
179 kW
Torque
461 Nm
340 lb-ft
208 Nm
153 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.0 s
6.2 s
Top speed
257 km/h
160 mph
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Lightness
1,605 kg
3,538 lb
1,270 kg
2,800 lb
Fuel consumption
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
9.9 L/100 km
23.8 mpg US
28.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
215 L
7.6 cu ft
Length
4,914 mm
193.5 in
Height
1,315 mm
51.8 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
143 L
5.1 cu ft
Length
4,135 mm
162.8 in
Height
1,270 mm
50.0 in
Range score
512 km
318 mi
505 km
314 mi
CO2 score
293 g/km
235 g/km
Trunk score
215 L
7.6 cu ft
143 L
5.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
193 hp/t
144 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp
189 hp/t
141 kW/t
5.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleChevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8Honda S2000 (AP1) 2.0
Consumption12.4 L/100 km19 mpg US22.8 mpg UK9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km21.70 LC100 km17.33 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi34.92 LC100 mi27.88 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,860 L491 US gal409 UK gal1,485 L392 US gal327 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,255 LC/year2,599 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8

  • Has 70 hp more
  • Has 253 Nm more
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 7 km (4 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 72 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Honda S2000 (AP1) 2.0

  • Is 335 kg lighter
  • Uses 2.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Emits 58 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Chevrolet Camaro IV Z28 5.7 i V8
Honda S2000 (AP1) 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Z28 5.7 i V8
2.0 T
VS
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8vsChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T
2.0
2.0
VS
HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0vsHondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.0
Z28 5.7 i V8
2.0
VS
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8vsChevroletCamaro VI Convertible2.0
2.0
2.3 20V T5
VS
HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0vsVolvoC70 Convertible2.3 20V T5
Z28 5.7 i V8
Z28 5.7 i V8
VS
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8vsChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8
2.0
3.2 V6
VS
HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0vsAlfa RomeoSpider (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6
Z28 5.7 i V8
2.0
VS
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8vsChevroletCamaro VI2.0
2.0
330Ci
VS
HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0vsBMW3 Series Convertible (E46)330Ci
Z28 5.7 i V8
CLK 500
VS
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8vsMercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500
2.0
3.0 V6
VS
HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0vsAlfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6
Z28 5.7 i V8
AMG CLK 55 V8
VS
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8vsMercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8
2.0
3.0 V6 30V
VS
HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0vsAUDIA4 Cabriolet (B6 8H)3.0 V6 30V
Chevrolet Camaro IV · Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 vs Honda S2000 (AP1) 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster