Honda S2000 (AP1)
Car comparison
Honda S2000 (AP1) 2.0vsBMW 3 Series Convertible (E46) 330Ci
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW 3 Series Convertible (E46)
330Ci
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 3 Series Convertible (E46) 330Ci
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions229 g/km
- Best estimated range656 km408 mi
- Largest trunk260 L
- Best overall score51/100
- Best economy score81/100
- Best practicality score43/100
Honda S2000 (AP1) 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.2 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Most powerful240 hp179 kW
- Lightest1,270 kg2,800 lb
- Best power-to-weight189 hp/t141 kW/t5.3 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption13.2 L/100 km17.8 mpg US21.4 mpg UK
- Best performance score56/100
Specification comparison
| Model | HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | BMW3 Series Convertible (E46)330Ci |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 240hp179kW | 231hp172kW |
| Torque | 208Nm153lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,270kg2,800lb | 1,645kg3,627lb |
| Gross weight | 1,535kg3,384lb | 2,045kg4,508lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | 247 km/h 153 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 79.4s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 93.3s99% target: 245 km/h / 152 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.2s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.5s Calculated | 27.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.9s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK | 13.4L/100 km17.6mpg US21.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.3s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 189hp/t141kW/t86hp/1000 lb Calculated | 140hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 164Nm/t110lb-ft/ton Calculated | 182Nm/t122lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 505km314mi Calculated | 656km408mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 2,979cc182cu in |
| Length | 4,135mm163in | 4,488mm177in |
| Width | 1,750mm69in | 1,757mm69in |
| Height | 1,270mm50in | 1,370mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,400mm94in | 2,725mm107in |
| Front track | 1,470mm58in | 1,471mm58in |
| Rear track | 1,510mm59in | 1,483mm58in |
| Ground clearance | 129mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 143L | 260L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 300L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 63L |
| CO2 emissions | 235g/km | 229g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Honda S2000 (AP1) 2.0: Power / Torque
- BMW 3 Series Convertible (E46) 330Ci: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | 8,300 rpm | 7,500 rpm | 8,550 rpm |
| BMW3 Series Convertible (E46)330Ci | 5,900 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,150 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | BMW3 Series Convertible (E46)330Ci |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.9 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.2 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.5 s | 27.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | 247 km/h 153 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.0 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.3 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 162 km/h 101 mph | 155 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | 240 hp 179 kW |
| BMW3 Series Convertible (E46)330Ci | 231 hp 172 kW |
Honda S2000 (AP1) 2.0 has 9 hp more than BMW 3 Series Convertible (E46) 330Ci.
The biggest power difference is between BMW 3 Series Convertible (E46) 330Ci and Honda S2000 (AP1) 2.0: 9 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | 208 Nm 153 lb-ft |
| BMW3 Series Convertible (E46)330Ci | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | 1,270 kg 2,800 lb |
| BMW3 Series Convertible (E46)330Ci | 1,645 kg 3,627 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| BMW3 Series Convertible (E46)330Ci | 247 km/h 153 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | 6.2 s |
| BMW3 Series Convertible (E46)330Ci | 6.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Honda S2000 (AP1) 2.0 and BMW 3 Series Convertible (E46) 330Ci: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK |
| BMW3 Series Convertible (E46)330Ci | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | 189 hp/t 141 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp |
| BMW3 Series Convertible (E46)330Ci | 140 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | 505 km 314 mi |
| BMW3 Series Convertible (E46)330Ci | 656 km 408 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | 240 hp 179 kW | 6.2 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| BMW3 Series Convertible (E46)330Ci | 231 hp 172 kW | 6.9 s | 247 km/h 153 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMW3 Series Convertible (E46)330Ci |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 |
| 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMW3 Series Convertible (E46)330Ci |
| 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Honda S2000 (AP1) 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | 6.2 s |
| BMW3 Series Convertible (E46)330Ci | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | 189 hp/t 141 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK |
| BMW3 Series Convertible (E46)330Ci | 140 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | BMW3 Series Convertible (E46)330Ci | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 240 hp 179 kW | 231 hp 172 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 208 Nm 153 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.2 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | 247 km/h 153 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,270 kg 2,800 lb | 1,645 kg 3,627 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 505 km 314 mi | 656 km 408 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 235 g/km | 229 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 143 L 5.1 cu ft | 260 L 9.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 189 hp/t 141 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | 140 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Honda S2000 (AP1) 2.0 | BMW 3 Series Convertible (E46) 330Ci |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK | 9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.33 LC100 km | 16.80 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.88 LC100 mi | 27.04 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,485 L392 US gal327 UK gal | 1,440 L380 US gal317 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,599 LC/year | 2,520 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Honda S2000 (AP1) 2.0
- Has 9 hp more
- Is 375 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 49 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
BMW 3 Series Convertible (E46) 330Ci
- Has 92 Nm more
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 151 km (94 mi) more estimated range
- Has 117 L more trunk volume
- Emits 6 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























