Honda S2000 (AP1)
Car comparison
Honda S2000 (AP1) 2.0vsVolvo C70 Convertible 2.3 20V T5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo C70 Convertible
2.3 20V T5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Honda S2000 (AP1) 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.2 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Most powerful240 hp179 kW
- Lightest1,270 kg2,800 lb
- Best power-to-weight189 hp/t141 kW/t5.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.2 L/100 km17.8 mpg US21.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
- Best performance score56/100
- Best economy score80/100
Volvo C70 Convertible 2.3 20V T5
- Highest torque330 Nm243 lb-ft
- Best estimated range598 km372 mi
- Largest trunk260 L
- Best overall score51/100
- Best practicality score44/100
Specification comparison
| Model | HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 20V T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 240hp179kW | 239hp178kW |
| Torque | 208Nm153lb-ft | 330Nm243lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,270kg2,800lb | 1,620kg3,571lb |
| Gross weight | 1,535kg3,384lb | 2,070kg4,564lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 79.4s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 102.1s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.2s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.5s Calculated | 28.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.9s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK | 11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK | 17.1L/100 km13.8mpg US16.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.3s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 189hp/t141kW/t86hp/1000 lb Calculated | 148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 164Nm/t110lb-ft/ton Calculated | 204Nm/t136lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 505km314mi Calculated | 598km372mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 2,319cc142cu in |
| Length | 4,135mm163in | 4,720mm186in |
| Width | 1,750mm69in | 1,820mm72in |
| Height | 1,270mm50in | 1,410mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,400mm94in | 2,660mm105in |
| Front track | 1,470mm58in | 1,520mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,510mm59in | 1,520mm60in |
| Ground clearance | 129mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 143L | 260L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 235g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Honda S2000 (AP1) 2.0: Power / Torque
- Volvo C70 Convertible 2.3 20V T5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | 8,300 rpm | 7,500 rpm | 8,550 rpm |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 20V T5 | 5,100 rpm | 2,700 rpm | 5,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 20V T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.9 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.2 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.5 s | 28.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.0 s | 12.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.3 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 162 km/h 101 mph | 153 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | 240 hp 179 kW |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 20V T5 | 239 hp 178 kW |
Honda S2000 (AP1) 2.0 has 1 hp more than Volvo C70 Convertible 2.3 20V T5.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo C70 Convertible 2.3 20V T5 and Honda S2000 (AP1) 2.0: 1 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | 208 Nm 153 lb-ft |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 20V T5 | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | 1,270 kg 2,800 lb |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 20V T5 | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 20V T5 | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | 6.2 s |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 20V T5 | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Honda S2000 (AP1) 2.0 and Volvo C70 Convertible 2.3 20V T5: 1.0 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 20V T5 | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Honda S2000 (AP1) 2.0 and Volvo C70 Convertible 2.3 20V T5: 1.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | 189 hp/t 141 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 20V T5 | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | 505 km 314 mi |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 20V T5 | 598 km 372 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | 240 hp 179 kW | 6.2 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 20V T5 | 239 hp 178 kW | 7.2 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 20V T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 |
| 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 20V T5 |
| 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Honda S2000 (AP1) 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | 6.2 s |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 20V T5 | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | 189 hp/t 141 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 20V T5 | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 20V T5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 240 hp 179 kW | 239 hp 178 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 208 Nm 153 lb-ft | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.2 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,270 kg 2,800 lb | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 505 km 314 mi | 598 km 372 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 235 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 143 L 5.1 cu ft | 260 L 9.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 189 hp/t 141 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Honda S2000 (AP1) 2.0 | Volvo C70 Convertible 2.3 20V T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK | 11.7 L/100 km20.1 mpg US24.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.33 LC100 km | 20.47 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.88 LC100 mi | 32.95 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,485 L392 US gal327 UK gal | 1,755 L464 US gal386 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,599 LC/year | 3,071 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Honda S2000 (AP1) 2.0
- Has 1 hp more
- Is 350 kg lighter
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 41 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Volvo C70 Convertible 2.3 20V T5
- Has 122 Nm more
- Has 93 km (58 mi) more estimated range
- Has 117 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























