Volvo C70 Convertible
Car comparison
Volvo C70 Convertible 2.3 20V T5vsAlfa Romeo Spider (916) 3.0 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Spider (916)
3.0 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo C70 Convertible 2.3 20V T5
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Most powerful239 hp178 kW
- Highest torque330 Nm243 lb-ft
- Lowest highway consumption8.7 L/100 km27.0 mpg US32.5 mpg UK
- Largest trunk260 L
- Best overall score51/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best economy score75/100
- Best practicality score44/100
Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 3.0 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.8 s
- Lightest1,420 kg3,131 lb
- Best power-to-weight154 hp/t114 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption16.8 L/100 km14.0 mpg US16.8 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 20V T5 | Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 239hp178kW | 218hp163kW |
| Torque | 330Nm243lb-ft | 265Nm195lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,620kg3,571lb | 1,420kg3,131lb |
| Gross weight | 2,070kg4,564lb | 1,680kg3,704lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 102.4s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 88.4s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 6.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.8s Calculated | 30.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8s Calculated | 6.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 17.1L/100 km13.8mpg US16.5mpg UK | 16.8L/100 km14mpg US16.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 154hp/t114kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 204Nm/t136lb-ft/ton Calculated | 187Nm/t125lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 598km372mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,319cc142cu in | 2,959cc181cu in |
| Length | 4,720mm186in | 4,285mm169in |
| Width | 1,820mm72in | 1,780mm70in |
| Height | 1,410mm56in | 1,315mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,660mm105in | 2,540mm100in |
| Front track | 1,520mm60in | 1,510mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,520mm60in | 1,530mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 260L | 147L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo C70 Convertible 2.3 20V T5: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 20V T5 | 5,100 rpm | 2,700 rpm | 5,350 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6 | 6,300 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 20V T5 | Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.8 s | 6.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 6.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.8 s | 30.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 153 km/h 95 mph | 153 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 20V T5 | 239 hp 178 kW |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6 | 218 hp 163 kW |
Volvo C70 Convertible 2.3 20V T5 has 21 hp more than Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 3.0 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 3.0 V6 and Volvo C70 Convertible 2.3 20V T5: 21 hp (16 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 20V T5 | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6 | 265 Nm 195 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 20V T5 | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6 | 1,420 kg 3,131 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 20V T5 | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6 | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 20V T5 | 7.2 s |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6 | 6.8 s |
Although Volvo C70 Convertible 2.3 20V T5 has more power, Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 3.0 V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 3.0 V6 and Volvo C70 Convertible 2.3 20V T5: 0.4 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 20V T5 | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6 | 154 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 20V T5 | 239 hp 178 kW | 7.2 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6 | 218 hp 163 kW | 6.8 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 20V T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 20V T5 | Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 239 hp 178 kW | 218 hp 163 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | 265 Nm 195 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 6.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb | 1,420 kg 3,131 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 598 km 372 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 260 L 9.2 cu ft | 147 L 5.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 154 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo C70 Convertible 2.3 20V T5 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.7 L/100 km20.1 mpg US24.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.47 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.95 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,755 L464 US gal386 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,071 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo C70 Convertible 2.3 20V T5
- Has 21 hp more
- Has 65 Nm more
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 113 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 3.0 V6
- Is 200 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























