Alfa Romeo Spider (916)
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 3.0 V6vsVolvo C70 Convertible 2.0 20V Turbo
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo C70 Convertible
2.0 20V Turbo
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo C70 Convertible 2.0 20V Turbo
- Most powerful225 hp168 kW
- Highest torque310 Nm229 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption16.4 L/100 km14.3 mpg US17.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34.0 mpg UK
- Largest trunk260 L
- Best overall score49/100
- Best practicality score44/100
Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 3.0 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.8 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Lightest1,420 kg3,131 lb
- Best power-to-weight154 hp/t114 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score0/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6 | VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 218hp163kW | 225hp168kW |
| Torque | 265Nm195lb-ft | 310Nm229lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,420kg3,131lb | 1,570kg3,461lb |
| Gross weight | 1,680kg3,704lb | 1,970kg4,343lb |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 88.4s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 102.0s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.8s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.3s Calculated | 35.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 7.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.8L/100 km14mpg US16.8mpg UK | 16.4L/100 km14.3mpg US17.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 154hp/t114kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated | 143hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 187Nm/t125lb-ft/ton Calculated | 197Nm/t132lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,959cc181cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,285mm169in | 4,720mm186in |
| Width | 1,780mm70in | 1,820mm72in |
| Height | 1,315mm52in | 1,410mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,540mm100in | 2,660mm105in |
| Front track | 1,510mm59in | 1,520mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,530mm60in | 1,520mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 147L | 260L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
- Volvo C70 Convertible 2.0 20V Turbo: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6 | 6,300 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo | 5,700 rpm | 2,700 rpm | 5,950 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6 | VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 7.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.8 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.3 s | 35.1 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 153 km/h 95 mph | 147 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6 | 218 hp 163 kW |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo | 225 hp 168 kW |
Volvo C70 Convertible 2.0 20V Turbo has 7 hp more than Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 3.0 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 3.0 V6 and Volvo C70 Convertible 2.0 20V Turbo: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6 | 265 Nm 195 lb-ft |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6 | 1,420 kg 3,131 lb |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6 | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6 | 6.8 s |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo | 7.9 s |
Although Volvo C70 Convertible 2.0 20V Turbo has more power, Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 3.0 V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 3.0 V6 and Volvo C70 Convertible 2.0 20V Turbo: 1.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6 | 154 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6 | 218 hp 163 kW | 6.8 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo | 225 hp 168 kW | 7.9 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6 | VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 218 hp 163 kW | 225 hp 168 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 265 Nm 195 lb-ft | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.8 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,420 kg 3,131 lb | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 147 L 5.2 cu ft | 260 L 9.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 154 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 3.0 V6
- Is 150 kg lighter
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Volvo C70 Convertible 2.0 20V Turbo
- Has 7 hp more
- Has 45 Nm more
- Has 113 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























