Volvo C70 Convertible
Car comparison
Volvo C70 Convertible 2.0 20V TurbovsAlfa Romeo Spider (916) 2.0 V6 TB
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Spider (916)
2.0 V6 TB
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo C70 Convertible 2.0 20V Turbo
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Most powerful225 hp168 kW
- Highest torque310 Nm229 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight143 hp/t107 kW/t7.0 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption16.4 L/100 km14.3 mpg US17.2 mpg UK
- Largest trunk260 L
- Best overall score49/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score0/100
- Best practicality score44/100
Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 2.0 V6 TB
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.7 s
- Lightest1,430 kg3,153 lb
- Lowest highway consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo | Alfa RomeoSpider (916)2.0 V6 TB |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 225hp168kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 310Nm229lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,570kg3,461lb | 1,430kg3,153lb |
| Gross weight | 1,970kg4,343lb | 1,680kg3,704lb |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 102.0s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 97.8s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.9s | 7.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 35.1s Calculated | 37.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.5s Calculated | 7.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.4L/100 km14.3mpg US17.2mpg UK | 16.6L/100 km14.2mpg US17.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 143hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated | 140hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 197Nm/t132lb-ft/ton Calculated | 196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,720mm186in | 4,285mm169in |
| Width | 1,820mm72in | 1,780mm70in |
| Height | 1,410mm56in | 1,320mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,660mm105in | 2,540mm100in |
| Front track | 1,520mm60in | 1,500mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,520mm60in | 1,505mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 260L | 110L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo C70 Convertible 2.0 20V Turbo: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 2.0 V6 TB: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo | 5,700 rpm | 2,700 rpm | 5,950 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)2.0 V6 TB | 5,600 rpm | 2,400 rpm | 5,850 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo | Alfa RomeoSpider (916)2.0 V6 TB |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.5 s | 7.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.9 s | 7.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 35.1 s | 37.4 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 147 km/h 91 mph | 146 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo | 225 hp 168 kW |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)2.0 V6 TB | 200 hp 149 kW |
Volvo C70 Convertible 2.0 20V Turbo has 25 hp more than Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 2.0 V6 TB.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 2.0 V6 TB and Volvo C70 Convertible 2.0 20V Turbo: 25 hp (19 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)2.0 V6 TB | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)2.0 V6 TB | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)2.0 V6 TB | 228 km/h 142 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo | 7.9 s |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)2.0 V6 TB | 7.7 s |
Although Volvo C70 Convertible 2.0 20V Turbo has more power, Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 2.0 V6 TB is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 2.0 V6 TB and Volvo C70 Convertible 2.0 20V Turbo: 0.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)2.0 V6 TB | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo | 225 hp 168 kW | 7.9 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)2.0 V6 TB | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.7 s | 228 km/h 142 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)2.0 V6 TB |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo | Alfa RomeoSpider (916)2.0 V6 TB | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 225 hp 168 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.9 s | 7.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 260 L 9.2 cu ft | 110 L 3.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo C70 Convertible 2.0 20V Turbo
- Has 25 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 150 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 2.0 V6 TB
- Is 140 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























