BMW 3 Series Convertible (E46)
Car comparison
BMW 3 Series Convertible (E46) 330CivsVolvo C70 Convertible 2.0 20V Turbo
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo C70 Convertible
2.0 20V Turbo
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 3 Series Convertible (E46) 330Ci
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.5 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Most powerful231 hp172 kW
- Lowest city consumption14.9 L/100 km15.8 mpg US19.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Largest trunk260 L
- Best overall score50/100
- Best performance score53/100
- Best economy score79/100
Volvo C70 Convertible 2.0 20V Turbo
- Highest torque310 Nm229 lb-ft
- Lightest1,570 kg3,461 lb
- Best power-to-weight143 hp/t107 kW/t7.0 kg/hp
- Best practicality score44/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW3 Series Convertible (E46)330Ci | VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 231hp172kW | 225hp168kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 310Nm229lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,645kg3,627lb | 1,570kg3,461lb |
| Gross weight | 1,680kg3,704lb | 1,970kg4,343lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 103.4s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 101.8s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.5s Calculated | 35.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.1s Calculated | 7.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.9L/100 km15.8mpg US19.0mpg UK | 16.4L/100 km14.3mpg US17.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 140hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated | 143hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 182Nm/t122lb-ft/ton Calculated | 197Nm/t132lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 618km384mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,979cc182cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,488mm177in | 4,720mm186in |
| Width | 1,757mm69in | 1,820mm72in |
| Height | 1,370mm54in | 1,410mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,725mm107in | 2,660mm105in |
| Front track | 1,471mm58in | 1,520mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,483mm58in | 1,520mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 260L | 260L |
| Max trunk volume | 300L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 244g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 3 Series Convertible (E46) 330Ci: Power / Torque
- Volvo C70 Convertible 2.0 20V Turbo: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Convertible (E46)330Ci | 5,900 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,150 rpm |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo | 5,700 rpm | 2,700 rpm | 5,950 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW3 Series Convertible (E46)330Ci | VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.1 s | 7.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.5 s | 35.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 94 mph | 147 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Convertible (E46)330Ci | 231 hp 172 kW |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo | 225 hp 168 kW |
BMW 3 Series Convertible (E46) 330Ci has 6 hp more than Volvo C70 Convertible 2.0 20V Turbo.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo C70 Convertible 2.0 20V Turbo and BMW 3 Series Convertible (E46) 330Ci: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Convertible (E46)330Ci | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Convertible (E46)330Ci | 1,645 kg 3,627 lb |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Convertible (E46)330Ci | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Convertible (E46)330Ci | 7.5 s |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo | 7.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 3 Series Convertible (E46) 330Ci and Volvo C70 Convertible 2.0 20V Turbo: 0.4 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Convertible (E46)330Ci | 140 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Convertible (E46)330Ci | 231 hp 172 kW | 7.5 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo | 225 hp 168 kW | 7.9 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Convertible (E46)330Ci |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW3 Series Convertible (E46)330Ci | VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 231 hp 172 kW | 225 hp 168 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,645 kg 3,627 lb | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 618 km 384 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 244 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 260 L 9.2 cu ft | 260 L 9.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 140 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 3 Series Convertible (E46) 330Ci |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.73 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,530 L404 US gal337 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,678 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 3 Series Convertible (E46) 330Ci
- Has 6 hp more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Volvo C70 Convertible 2.0 20V Turbo
- Has 10 Nm more
- Is 75 kg lighter
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























