Volvo C70 Convertible
Car comparison
Volvo C70 Convertible 2.0 20V TurbovsAUDI A4 Cabriolet (B6 8H) 3.0 V6 30V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI A4 Cabriolet (B6 8H)
3.0 V6 30V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo C70 Convertible 2.0 20V Turbo
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Most powerful225 hp168 kW
- Highest torque310 Nm229 lb-ft
- Lightest1,570 kg3,461 lb
- Best power-to-weight143 hp/t107 kW/t7.0 kg/hp
- Largest trunk260 L
- Best overall score49/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best practicality score44/100
AUDI A4 Cabriolet (B6 8H) 3.0 V6 30V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.8 s
- Lowest city consumption13.8 L/100 km17.0 mpg US20.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
- Best economy score81/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo | AUDIA4 Cabriolet (B6 8H)3.0 V6 30V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 225hp168kW | 220hp164kW |
| Torque | 310Nm229lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,570kg3,461lb | 1,630kg3,594lb |
| Gross weight | 1,970kg4,343lb | 2,110kg4,652lb |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 101.8s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 97.1s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.9s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 35.1s Calculated | 34.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.5s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.4L/100 km14.3mpg US17.2mpg UK | 13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 143hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated | 135hp/t101kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 197Nm/t132lb-ft/ton Calculated | 184Nm/t123lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 722km448mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 2,976cc182cu in |
| Length | 4,720mm186in | 4,573mm180in |
| Width | 1,820mm72in | 1,777mm70in |
| Height | 1,410mm56in | 1,391mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,660mm105in | 2,654mm104in |
| Front track | 1,520mm60in | 1,523mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,520mm60in | 1,523mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 260L | 246L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 315L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 233g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo C70 Convertible 2.0 20V Turbo: Power / Torque
- AUDI A4 Cabriolet (B6 8H) 3.0 V6 30V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo | 5,700 rpm | 2,700 rpm | 5,950 rpm |
| AUDIA4 Cabriolet (B6 8H)3.0 V6 30V | 6,300 rpm | 3,200 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo | AUDIA4 Cabriolet (B6 8H)3.0 V6 30V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.5 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.9 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 35.1 s | 34.4 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 147 km/h 91 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo | 225 hp 168 kW |
| AUDIA4 Cabriolet (B6 8H)3.0 V6 30V | 220 hp 164 kW |
Volvo C70 Convertible 2.0 20V Turbo has 5 hp more than AUDI A4 Cabriolet (B6 8H) 3.0 V6 30V.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI A4 Cabriolet (B6 8H) 3.0 V6 30V and Volvo C70 Convertible 2.0 20V Turbo: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft |
| AUDIA4 Cabriolet (B6 8H)3.0 V6 30V | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb |
| AUDIA4 Cabriolet (B6 8H)3.0 V6 30V | 1,630 kg 3,594 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| AUDIA4 Cabriolet (B6 8H)3.0 V6 30V | 234 km/h 145 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo | 7.9 s |
| AUDIA4 Cabriolet (B6 8H)3.0 V6 30V | 7.8 s |
Although Volvo C70 Convertible 2.0 20V Turbo has more power, AUDI A4 Cabriolet (B6 8H) 3.0 V6 30V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A4 Cabriolet (B6 8H) 3.0 V6 30V and Volvo C70 Convertible 2.0 20V Turbo: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
| AUDIA4 Cabriolet (B6 8H)3.0 V6 30V | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo | 225 hp 168 kW | 7.9 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| AUDIA4 Cabriolet (B6 8H)3.0 V6 30V | 220 hp 164 kW | 7.8 s | 234 km/h 145 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIA4 Cabriolet (B6 8H)3.0 V6 30V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo | AUDIA4 Cabriolet (B6 8H)3.0 V6 30V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 225 hp 168 kW | 220 hp 164 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.9 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb | 1,630 kg 3,594 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 722 km 448 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 233 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 260 L 9.2 cu ft | 246 L 8.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A4 Cabriolet (B6 8H) 3.0 V6 30V |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.97 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.32 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,455 L384 US gal320 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,546 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo C70 Convertible 2.0 20V Turbo
- Has 5 hp more
- Has 10 Nm more
- Is 60 kg lighter
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 14 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
AUDI A4 Cabriolet (B6 8H) 3.0 V6 30V
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























