AUDI A4 Cabriolet (B6 8H)
Car comparison
AUDI A4 Cabriolet (B6 8H) 3.0 V6 30VvsVolvo C70 Convertible 2.0 20V Turbo
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo C70 Convertible
2.0 20V Turbo
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A4 Cabriolet (B6 8H) 3.0 V6 30V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.8 s
- Fastest top speed243 km/h151 mph
- Lowest city consumption14.4 L/100 km16.3 mpg US19.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
- Best overall score49/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score80/100
Volvo C70 Convertible 2.0 20V Turbo
- Most powerful225 hp168 kW
- Highest torque310 Nm229 lb-ft
- Lightest1,570 kg3,461 lb
- Best power-to-weight143 hp/t107 kW/t7.0 kg/hp
- Largest trunk260 L
- Best practicality score44/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA4 Cabriolet (B6 8H)3.0 V6 30V | VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 220hp164kW | 225hp168kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 310Nm229lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,590kg3,505lb | 1,570kg3,461lb |
| Gross weight | 2,070kg4,564lb | 1,970kg4,343lb |
| Top speed | 243 km/h 151 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 102.5s99% target: 241 km/h / 149 mph Calculated | 102.0s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.0s Calculated | 35.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 7.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.4L/100 km16.3mpg US19.6mpg UK | 16.4L/100 km14.3mpg US17.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 138hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated | 143hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 189Nm/t126lb-ft/ton Calculated | 197Nm/t132lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 707km439mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,976cc182cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,573mm180in | 4,720mm186in |
| Width | 1,777mm70in | 1,820mm72in |
| Height | 1,391mm55in | 1,410mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,654mm104in | 2,660mm105in |
| Front track | 1,523mm60in | 1,520mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,523mm60in | 1,520mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 246L | 260L |
| Max trunk volume | 315L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 238g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A4 Cabriolet (B6 8H) 3.0 V6 30V: Power / Torque
- Volvo C70 Convertible 2.0 20V Turbo: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA4 Cabriolet (B6 8H)3.0 V6 30V | 6,300 rpm | 3,200 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo | 5,700 rpm | 2,700 rpm | 5,950 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA4 Cabriolet (B6 8H)3.0 V6 30V | VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 7.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.0 s | 35.1 s |
| Top speed | 243 km/h 151 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 149 km/h 93 mph | 147 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA4 Cabriolet (B6 8H)3.0 V6 30V | 220 hp 164 kW |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo | 225 hp 168 kW |
Volvo C70 Convertible 2.0 20V Turbo has 5 hp more than AUDI A4 Cabriolet (B6 8H) 3.0 V6 30V.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI A4 Cabriolet (B6 8H) 3.0 V6 30V and Volvo C70 Convertible 2.0 20V Turbo: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA4 Cabriolet (B6 8H)3.0 V6 30V | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA4 Cabriolet (B6 8H)3.0 V6 30V | 1,590 kg 3,505 lb |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA4 Cabriolet (B6 8H)3.0 V6 30V | 243 km/h 151 mph |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA4 Cabriolet (B6 8H)3.0 V6 30V | 7.8 s |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo | 7.9 s |
Although Volvo C70 Convertible 2.0 20V Turbo has more power, AUDI A4 Cabriolet (B6 8H) 3.0 V6 30V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A4 Cabriolet (B6 8H) 3.0 V6 30V and Volvo C70 Convertible 2.0 20V Turbo: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA4 Cabriolet (B6 8H)3.0 V6 30V | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA4 Cabriolet (B6 8H)3.0 V6 30V | 220 hp 164 kW | 7.8 s | 243 km/h 151 mph |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo | 225 hp 168 kW | 7.9 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA4 Cabriolet (B6 8H)3.0 V6 30V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA4 Cabriolet (B6 8H)3.0 V6 30V | VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 220 hp 164 kW | 225 hp 168 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 243 km/h 151 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,590 kg 3,505 lb | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 707 km 439 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 238 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 246 L 8.7 cu ft | 260 L 9.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A4 Cabriolet (B6 8H) 3.0 V6 30V |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.88 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,485 L392 US gal327 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,599 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A4 Cabriolet (B6 8H) 3.0 V6 30V
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Volvo C70 Convertible 2.0 20V Turbo
- Has 5 hp more
- Has 10 Nm more
- Is 20 kg lighter
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 14 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























