Volvo C70 Convertible
Car comparison
Volvo C70 Convertible 2.3 20V T5vsAlfa Romeo Spider (916) 2.0 V6 TB
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Spider (916)
2.0 V6 TB
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo C70 Convertible 2.3 20V T5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Most powerful239 hp178 kW
- Highest torque330 Nm243 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight148 hp/t110 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Largest trunk260 L
- Best overall score51/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best economy score75/100
- Best practicality score44/100
Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 2.0 V6 TB
- Lightest1,430 kg3,153 lb
- Lowest city consumption16.6 L/100 km14.2 mpg US17.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 20V T5 | Alfa RomeoSpider (916)2.0 V6 TB |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 239hp178kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 330Nm243lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,620kg3,571lb | 1,430kg3,153lb |
| Gross weight | 2,070kg4,564lb | 1,680kg3,704lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 102.4s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 97.8s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 7.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.8s Calculated | 37.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8s Calculated | 7.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 17.1L/100 km13.8mpg US16.5mpg UK | 16.6L/100 km14.2mpg US17.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 140hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 204Nm/t136lb-ft/ton Calculated | 196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 598km372mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,319cc142cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,720mm186in | 4,285mm169in |
| Width | 1,820mm72in | 1,780mm70in |
| Height | 1,410mm56in | 1,320mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,660mm105in | 2,540mm100in |
| Front track | 1,520mm60in | 1,500mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,520mm60in | 1,505mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 260L | 110L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo C70 Convertible 2.3 20V T5: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 2.0 V6 TB: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 20V T5 | 5,100 rpm | 2,700 rpm | 5,350 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)2.0 V6 TB | 5,600 rpm | 2,400 rpm | 5,850 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 20V T5 | Alfa RomeoSpider (916)2.0 V6 TB |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.8 s | 7.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 7.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.8 s | 37.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 153 km/h 95 mph | 146 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 20V T5 | 239 hp 178 kW |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)2.0 V6 TB | 200 hp 149 kW |
Volvo C70 Convertible 2.3 20V T5 has 39 hp more than Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 2.0 V6 TB.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 2.0 V6 TB and Volvo C70 Convertible 2.3 20V T5: 39 hp (29 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 20V T5 | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)2.0 V6 TB | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 20V T5 | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)2.0 V6 TB | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 20V T5 | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)2.0 V6 TB | 228 km/h 142 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 20V T5 | 7.2 s |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)2.0 V6 TB | 7.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo C70 Convertible 2.3 20V T5 and Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 2.0 V6 TB: 0.5 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 20V T5 | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)2.0 V6 TB | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 20V T5 | 239 hp 178 kW | 7.2 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)2.0 V6 TB | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.7 s | 228 km/h 142 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 20V T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)2.0 V6 TB |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 20V T5 | Alfa RomeoSpider (916)2.0 V6 TB | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 239 hp 178 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 7.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 598 km 372 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 260 L 9.2 cu ft | 110 L 3.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo C70 Convertible 2.3 20V T5 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.7 L/100 km20.1 mpg US24.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.47 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.95 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,755 L464 US gal386 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,071 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo C70 Convertible 2.3 20V T5
- Has 39 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 22 km/h (14 mph) higher top speed
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 150 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 2.0 V6 TB
- Is 190 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























