Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) CLK 320 V6vsAlfa Romeo Spider (916) 3.0 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Spider (916)
3.0 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) CLK 320 V6
- Fastest top speed236 km/h147 mph
- Most powerful218 hp163 kW
- Highest torque310 Nm229 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption15.7 L/100 km15.0 mpg US18.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
- Largest trunk237 L
- Best overall score47/100
- Best economy score78/100
- Best practicality score43/100
Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 3.0 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.8 s
- Lightest1,420 kg3,131 lb
- Best power-to-weight154 hp/t114 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
- Best performance score52/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6 | Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 218hp163kW | 218hp163kW |
| Torque | 310Nm229lb-ft | 265Nm195lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,620kg3,571lb | 1,420kg3,131lb |
| Gross weight | 2,070kg4,564lb | 1,680kg3,704lb |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 103.4s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 88.4s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.3s | 6.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 35.7s Calculated | 30.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.9s Calculated | 6.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.7L/100 km15mpg US18.0mpg UK | 16.8L/100 km14mpg US16.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.0s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 135hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated | 154hp/t114kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 191Nm/t128lb-ft/ton Calculated | 187Nm/t125lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 569km353mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 3,199cc195cu in | 2,959cc181cu in |
| Length | 4,567mm180in | 4,285mm169in |
| Width | 1,722mm68in | 1,780mm70in |
| Height | 1,380mm54in | 1,315mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,690mm106in | 2,540mm100in |
| Front track | 1,505mm59in | 1,510mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,474mm58in | 1,530mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 237L | 147L |
| Max trunk volume | 350L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) CLK 320 V6: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6 | 5,700 rpm | 3,000-4,600 rpm | 5,950 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6 | 6,300 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6 | Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.9 s | 6.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.3 s | 6.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 35.7 s | 30.3 s |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.0 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 145 km/h 90 mph | 153 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6 | 218 hp 163 kW |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6 | 218 hp 163 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6 | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6 | 265 Nm 195 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6 | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6 | 1,420 kg 3,131 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6 | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6 | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6 | 8.3 s |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6 | 6.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 3.0 V6 and Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) CLK 320 V6: 1.5 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6 | 135 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6 | 154 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6 | 218 hp 163 kW | 8.3 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6 | 218 hp 163 kW | 6.8 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6 | Alfa RomeoSpider (916)3.0 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 218 hp 163 kW | 218 hp 163 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft | 265 Nm 195 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.3 s | 6.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb | 1,420 kg 3,131 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 569 km 353 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 237 L 8.4 cu ft | 147 L 5.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 135 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 154 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) CLK 320 V6 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.70 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,635 L432 US gal360 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,861 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) CLK 320 V6
- Has 45 Nm more
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 90 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Alfa Romeo Spider (916) 3.0 V6
- Is 200 kg lighter
- Is 1.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























