Volvo C70 Convertible
Car comparison
Volvo C70 Convertible 2.3 20V T5vsMercedes-Benz CLK (A208) CLK 320 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz CLK (A208)
CLK 320 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo C70 Convertible 2.3 20V T5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Most powerful239 hp178 kW
- Highest torque330 Nm243 lb-ft
- Lightest1,620 kg3,571 lb
- Best power-to-weight148 hp/t110 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Best estimated range598 km372 mi
- Largest trunk260 L
- Best overall score51/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best practicality score44/100
Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) CLK 320 V6
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption15.7 L/100 km15.0 mpg US18.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
- Best economy score78/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 20V T5 | Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 239hp178kW | 218hp163kW |
| Torque | 330Nm243lb-ft | 310Nm229lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,620kg3,571lb | 1,620kg3,571lb |
| Gross weight | 2,070kg4,564lb | 2,070kg4,564lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 102.4s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 103.4s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 8.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.8s Calculated | 35.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8s Calculated | 7.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 17.1L/100 km13.8mpg US16.5mpg UK | 15.7L/100 km15mpg US18.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 135hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 204Nm/t136lb-ft/ton Calculated | 191Nm/t128lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 598km372mi Calculated | 569km353mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,319cc142cu in | 3,199cc195cu in |
| Length | 4,720mm186in | 4,567mm180in |
| Width | 1,820mm72in | 1,722mm68in |
| Height | 1,410mm56in | 1,380mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,660mm105in | 2,690mm106in |
| Front track | 1,520mm60in | 1,505mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,520mm60in | 1,474mm58in |
| Trunk volume | 260L | 237L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 350L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 62L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo C70 Convertible 2.3 20V T5: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) CLK 320 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 20V T5 | 5,100 rpm | 2,700 rpm | 5,350 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6 | 5,700 rpm | 3,000-4,600 rpm | 5,950 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 20V T5 | Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.8 s | 7.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 8.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.8 s | 35.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 153 km/h 95 mph | 145 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 20V T5 | 239 hp 178 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6 | 218 hp 163 kW |
Volvo C70 Convertible 2.3 20V T5 has 21 hp more than Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) CLK 320 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) CLK 320 V6 and Volvo C70 Convertible 2.3 20V T5: 21 hp (16 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 20V T5 | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6 | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 20V T5 | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6 | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 20V T5 | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6 | 236 km/h 147 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 20V T5 | 7.2 s |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6 | 8.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo C70 Convertible 2.3 20V T5 and Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) CLK 320 V6: 1.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 20V T5 | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6 | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) CLK 320 V6 and Volvo C70 Convertible 2.3 20V T5: 0.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 20V T5 | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6 | 135 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 20V T5 | 598 km 372 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6 | 569 km 353 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 20V T5 | 239 hp 178 kW | 7.2 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6 | 218 hp 163 kW | 8.3 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 20V T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 20V T5 |
| 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6 |
| 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo C70 Convertible 2.3 20V T5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 20V T5 | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6 | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 20V T5 | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6 | 135 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 20V T5 | Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 239 hp 178 kW | 218 hp 163 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 8.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 598 km 372 mi | 569 km 353 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 260 L 9.2 cu ft | 237 L 8.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 135 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo C70 Convertible 2.3 20V T5 | Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) CLK 320 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.7 L/100 km20.1 mpg US24.1 mpg UK | 10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.47 LC100 km | 19.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.95 LC100 mi | 30.70 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,755 L464 US gal386 UK gal | 1,635 L432 US gal360 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,071 LC/year | 2,861 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo C70 Convertible 2.3 20V T5
- Has 21 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 14 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 29 km (18 mi) more estimated range
- Has 23 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) CLK 320 V6
- Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























