Chevrolet Blazer
Car comparison
Chevrolet Blazer 650TvsFord Evos 2.0 EcoBoost
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord Evos
2.0 EcoBoost
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.6 s
- Most powerful238 hp177 kW
- Highest torque376 Nm277 lb-ft
- Lightest1,655 kg3,649 lb
- Best power-to-weight144 hp/t107 kW/t7.0 kg/hp
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score53/100
- Best economy score87/100
- Best practicality score89/100
Chevrolet Blazer 650T
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
Specification comparison
| Model | ChevroletBlazer650T | FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 237hp177kW | 238hp177kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 376Nm277lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,880kg4,145lb | 1,655kg3,649lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,065kg4,553lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | 193 km/h 120 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 102.7s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 54.9s99% target: 191 km/h / 119 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 9.0s | 6.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 46.9s Calculated | - |
| 0-60 mph | 8.5s Calculated | 6.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 16.5s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated | 144hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 186Nm/t125lb-ft/ton Calculated | 227Nm/t152lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 880km547mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,999mm197in | 4,920mm194in |
| Width | 1,953mm77in | 1,920mm76in |
| Height | 1,732mm68in | 1,600mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,863mm113in | 2,945mm116in |
| Front track | 1,687mm66in | 1,628mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,683mm66in | 1,610mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 168mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 222L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 1,970L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 7 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 73L | 66L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Chevrolet Blazer 650T: Power / Torque
- Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletBlazer650T | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-4,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost | 5,500 rpm | 2,500-3,750 rpm | 6,800 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | ChevroletBlazer650T | FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.5 s | 6.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 9.0 s | 6.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 46.9 s | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | 193 km/h 120 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.8 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.9 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.5 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 139 km/h 87 mph | 149 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletBlazer650T | 237 hp 177 kW |
| FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost | 238 hp 177 kW |
Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost has 1 hp more than Chevrolet Blazer 650T.
The biggest power difference is between Chevrolet Blazer 650T and Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost: 1 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletBlazer650T | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost | 376 Nm 277 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletBlazer650T | 1,880 kg 4,145 lb |
| FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletBlazer650T | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost | 193 km/h 120 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletBlazer650T | 9.0 s |
| FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost | 6.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost and Chevrolet Blazer 650T: 2.4 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletBlazer650T | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
| FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletBlazer650T | 237 hp 177 kW | 9.0 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost | 238 hp 177 kW | 6.6 s | 193 km/h 120 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletBlazer650T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | ChevroletBlazer650T | FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 237 hp 177 kW | 238 hp 177 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 376 Nm 277 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 9.0 s | 6.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | 193 km/h 120 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,880 kg 4,145 lb | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 880 km 547 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 222 L 7.8 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,969 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Chevrolet Blazer 650T
- Has 27 km/h (17 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost
- Has 1 hp more
- Has 26 Nm more
- Is 225 kg lighter
- Is 2.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























