Car comparison

Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 245vsCadillac XTS 28T

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ford Taurus VII

EcoBoost 245

245 hp1999 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedSedan2015-2019
VS

Cadillac XTS

28T

269 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2013-2017

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Cadillac XTS 28T

  • Most powerful
    269 hp
    201 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    146 hp/t
    109 kW/t
    6.8 kg/hp
  • Best estimated range
    805 km
    500 mi
  • Largest trunk
    537 L
  • Best overall score
    60/100
  • Best performance score
    52/100

Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 245

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    218 km/h
    135 mph
  • Lightest
    1,794 kg
    3,955 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.2 L/100 km
    28.7 mpg US
    34.4 mpg UK
  • Best economy score
    85/100
  • Best practicality score
    77/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelFordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245CadillacXTS28T
Power
245hp183kW
269hp201kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,794kg3,955lb
1,840kg4,057lb
Gross weight
2,169kg4,782lb
2,260kg4,982lb
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
To 99% top speed
66.1s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph
Calculated
66.6s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.9s
8.0s
0-200 km/h
34.7s
Calculated
35.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.5s
Calculated
7.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK
8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
12.2L/100 km19.3mpg US23.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.7s
Calculated
15.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb
Calculated
146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
195Nm/t131lb-ft/ton
Calculated
217Nm/t145lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
780km485mi
Calculated
805km500mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,999cc122cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,996mm197in
5,131mm202in
Width
1,878mm74in
1,852mm73in
Height
1,503mm59in
1,511mm59in
Wheelbase
2,949mm116in
2,837mm112in
Front track
1,608mm63in
1,580mm62in
Rear track
1,618mm64in
1,591mm63in
Ground clearance
133mm5in
137mm5in
Trunk volume
534L
537L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
64L
70L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 245Cadillac XTS 28TPowerTorque
  • Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 245: Power / Torque
  • Cadillac XTS 28T: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 2455,500 rpm1,750-4,500 rpm6,500 rpm
CadillacXTS28T5,500 rpm2,400-4,400 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricFordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245CadillacXTS28T
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.5 s
7.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.9 s
8.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
34.7 s
35.0 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.8 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
7.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.4 s
10.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.3 s
13.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.7 s
15.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
151 km/h
94 mph
151 km/h
94 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245
245 hp
183 kW
CadillacXTS28T
269 hp
201 kW

Cadillac XTS 28T has 24 hp more than Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 245.

The biggest power difference is between Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 245 and Cadillac XTS 28T: 24 hp (18 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
CadillacXTS28T
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245
1,794 kg
3,955 lb
CadillacXTS28T
1,840 kg
4,057 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245
218 km/h
135 mph
CadillacXTS28T
218 km/h
135 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 2457.9 s
CadillacXTS28T8.0 s

Although Cadillac XTS 28T has more power, Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 245 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 245 and Cadillac XTS 28T: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
CadillacXTS28T
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 245 and Cadillac XTS 28T: 0.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245
137 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
CadillacXTS28T
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245
780 km
485 mi
CadillacXTS28T
805 km
500 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245
245 hp
183 kW
7.9 s
218 km/h
135 mph
CadillacXTS28T
269 hp
201 kW
8.0 s
218 km/h
135 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245
Power
245 hp
183 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
534 L
18.9 cu ft
Length
4,996 mm
196.7 in
Height
1,503 mm
59.2 in
CadillacXTS28T
Power
269 hp
201 kW
0-100 km/h8.0 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
537 L
19.0 cu ft
Length
5,131 mm
202.0 in
Height
1,511 mm
59.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245
Power
245 hp
183 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
CadillacXTS28T
Power
269 hp
201 kW
0-100 km/h8.0 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK

Cadillac XTS 28T is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
7.9 s
CadillacXTS28T
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK
8.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245
137 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
CadillacXTS28T
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleFordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245CadillacXTS28T
Power
245 hp
183 kW
269 hp
201 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.9 s
8.0 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
Lightness
1,794 kg
3,955 lb
1,840 kg
4,057 lb
Fuel consumption
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
534 L
18.9 cu ft
Length
4,996 mm
196.7 in
Height
1,503 mm
59.2 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
537 L
19.0 cu ft
Length
5,131 mm
202.0 in
Height
1,511 mm
59.5 in
Range score
780 km
485 mi
805 km
500 mi
Trunk score
534 L
18.9 cu ft
537 L
19.0 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
137 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFord Taurus VII EcoBoost 245Cadillac XTS 28T
Consumption8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK8.7 L/100 km27 mpg US32.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.35 LC100 km15.22 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi23.09 LC100 mi24.50 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal1,305 L345 US gal287 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,153 LC/year2,284 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 245

  • Is 46 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Cadillac XTS 28T

  • Has 24 hp more
  • Has 50 Nm more
  • Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 24 km (15 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 3 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 245
Cadillac XTS 28T
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

EcoBoost 245
SHO 3.2 V6 24V5
VS
FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245vsFordTaurus IISHO 3.2 V6 24V5
28T
28T
VS
CadillacXTS28TvsCadillacXTSFacelift 201728T
EcoBoost 245
1.5 EcoBoost
VS
FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245vsFordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost
28T
2.0
VS
CadillacXTS28TvsCadillacCTS III2.0
EcoBoost 245
2.0
VS
FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245vsJaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
28T
2.0
VS
CadillacXTS28TvsCadillacATS Sedan2.0
EcoBoost 245
350 V6
VS
FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245vsLexusES VI (XV60)Facelift 2015350 V6
28T
3.6 i V6
VS
CadillacXTS28TvsCadillacSTS3.6 i V6
EcoBoost 245
E 300
VS
FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300
28T
2.8 T V6
VS
CadillacXTS28TvsCadillacBLS2.8 T V6
EcoBoost 245
3.0d V6
VS
FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245vsMaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 20173.0d V6
28T
3.0 V6
VS
CadillacXTS28TvsMaseratiGhibli III (M157)3.0 V6
Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 245 vs Cadillac XTS 28T - car comparison - FastVsFaster