Ford Taurus II
Car comparison
Ford Taurus II SHO 3.2 V6 24V5vsFord Taurus VII EcoBoost 245
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord Taurus VII
EcoBoost 245
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 245
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.9 s
- Most powerful245 hp183 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Largest trunk534 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score85/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Ford Taurus II SHO 3.2 V6 24V5
- Fastest top speed224 km/h139 mph
- Lightest1,480 kg3,263 lb
- Best power-to-weight151 hp/t112 kW/t6.6 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | FordTaurus IISHO 3.2 V6 24V5 | FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 223hp166kW | 245hp183kW |
| Torque | 292Nm215lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,480kg3,263lb | 1,794kg3,955lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,169kg4,782lb |
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 70.8s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 66.1s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.4s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 33.4s Calculated | 34.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.0s Calculated | 7.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.1s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 151hp/t112kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated | 137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 197Nm/t132lb-ft/ton Calculated | 195Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 780km485mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,191cc195cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,877mm192in | 4,996mm197in |
| Width | 1,808mm71in | 1,878mm74in |
| Height | 1,374mm54in | 1,503mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,692mm106in | 2,949mm116in |
| Front track | 1,562mm61in | 1,608mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,537mm61in | 1,618mm64in |
| Ground clearance | - | 133mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 507L | 534L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 64L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Ford Taurus II SHO 3.2 V6 24V5: Power / Torque
- Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 245: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordTaurus IISHO 3.2 V6 24V5 | 6,000 rpm | 4,800 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 | 5,500 rpm | 1,750-4,500 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | FordTaurus IISHO 3.2 V6 24V5 | FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.0 s | 7.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.4 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 33.4 s | 34.7 s |
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.9 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.3 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.7 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.7 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.1 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordTaurus IISHO 3.2 V6 24V5 | 223 hp 166 kW |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 | 245 hp 183 kW |
Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 245 has 22 hp more than Ford Taurus II SHO 3.2 V6 24V5.
The biggest power difference is between Ford Taurus II SHO 3.2 V6 24V5 and Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 245: 22 hp (16 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordTaurus IISHO 3.2 V6 24V5 | 292 Nm 215 lb-ft |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordTaurus IISHO 3.2 V6 24V5 | 1,480 kg 3,263 lb |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 | 1,794 kg 3,955 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordTaurus IISHO 3.2 V6 24V5 | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 | 218 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordTaurus IISHO 3.2 V6 24V5 | 8.4 s |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 | 7.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 245 and Ford Taurus II SHO 3.2 V6 24V5: 0.5 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordTaurus IISHO 3.2 V6 24V5 | 151 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordTaurus IISHO 3.2 V6 24V5 | 223 hp 166 kW | 8.4 s | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 | 245 hp 183 kW | 7.9 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordTaurus IISHO 3.2 V6 24V5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | FordTaurus IISHO 3.2 V6 24V5 | FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 223 hp 166 kW | 245 hp 183 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 292 Nm 215 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.4 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,480 kg 3,263 lb | 1,794 kg 3,955 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 780 km 485 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 507 L 17.9 cu ft | 534 L 18.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 151 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 245 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.35 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.09 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,153 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ford Taurus II SHO 3.2 V6 24V5
- Is 314 kg lighter
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 245
- Has 22 hp more
- Has 58 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 27 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























