Car comparison

Ford Taurus II SHO 3.2 V6 24V5vsFord Taurus VII EcoBoost 245

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ford Taurus II

SHO 3.2 V6 24V5

223 hp3191 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedSedan1993-1995
VS

Ford Taurus VII

EcoBoost 245

245 hp1999 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedSedan2015-2019

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 245

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.9 s
  • Most powerful
    245 hp
    183 kW
  • Highest torque
    350 Nm
    258 lb-ft
  • Largest trunk
    534 L
  • Best overall score
    59/100
  • Best performance score
    51/100
  • Best economy score
    85/100
  • Best practicality score
    77/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelFordTaurus IISHO 3.2 V6 24V5FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245
Power
223hp166kW
245hp183kW
Torque
292Nm215lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
1,480kg3,263lb
1,794kg3,955lb
Gross weight-
2,169kg4,782lb
Top speed
224 km/h
139 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
To 99% top speed
70.8s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
66.1s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.4s
7.9s
0-200 km/h
33.4s
Calculated
34.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.0s
Calculated
7.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption-
8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.1s
Calculated
15.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
151hp/t112kW/t68hp/1000 lb
Calculated
137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
197Nm/t132lb-ft/ton
Calculated
195Nm/t131lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range-
780km485mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,191cc195cu in
1,999cc122cu in
Length
4,877mm192in
4,996mm197in
Width
1,808mm71in
1,878mm74in
Height
1,374mm54in
1,503mm59in
Wheelbase
2,692mm106in
2,949mm116in
Front track
1,562mm61in
1,608mm63in
Rear track
1,537mm61in
1,618mm64in
Ground clearance-
133mm5in
Trunk volume
507L
534L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
70L
64L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Ford Taurus II SHO 3.2 V6 24V5Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 245PowerTorque
  • Ford Taurus II SHO 3.2 V6 24V5: Power / Torque
  • Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 245: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
FordTaurus IISHO 3.2 V6 24V56,000 rpm4,800 rpm6,250 rpm
FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 2455,500 rpm1,750-4,500 rpm6,500 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricFordTaurus IISHO 3.2 V6 24V5FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.0 s
7.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.4 s
7.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
33.4 s
34.7 s
Top speed
224 km/h
139 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.9 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
7.3 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.7 s
10.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.7 s
13.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.1 s
15.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
150 km/h
93 mph
151 km/h
94 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordTaurus IISHO 3.2 V6 24V5
223 hp
166 kW
FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245
245 hp
183 kW

Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 245 has 22 hp more than Ford Taurus II SHO 3.2 V6 24V5.

The biggest power difference is between Ford Taurus II SHO 3.2 V6 24V5 and Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 245: 22 hp (16 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordTaurus IISHO 3.2 V6 24V5
292 Nm
215 lb-ft
FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordTaurus IISHO 3.2 V6 24V5
1,480 kg
3,263 lb
FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245
1,794 kg
3,955 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordTaurus IISHO 3.2 V6 24V5
224 km/h
139 mph
FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245
218 km/h
135 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordTaurus IISHO 3.2 V6 24V58.4 s
FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 2457.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 245 and Ford Taurus II SHO 3.2 V6 24V5: 0.5 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordTaurus IISHO 3.2 V6 24V5
151 hp/t
112 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245
137 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
FordTaurus IISHO 3.2 V6 24V5
223 hp
166 kW
8.4 s
224 km/h
139 mph
FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245
245 hp
183 kW
7.9 s
218 km/h
135 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
FordTaurus IISHO 3.2 V6 24V5
Power
223 hp
166 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
224 km/h
139 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
507 L
17.9 cu ft
Length
4,877 mm
192.0 in
Height
1,374 mm
54.1 in
FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245
Power
245 hp
183 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
534 L
18.9 cu ft
Length
4,996 mm
196.7 in
Height
1,503 mm
59.2 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleFordTaurus IISHO 3.2 V6 24V5FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245
Power
223 hp
166 kW
245 hp
183 kW
Torque
292 Nm
215 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.4 s
7.9 s
Top speed
224 km/h
139 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
Lightness
1,480 kg
3,263 lb
1,794 kg
3,955 lb
Fuel consumption
-
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
507 L
17.9 cu ft
Length
4,877 mm
192.0 in
Height
1,374 mm
54.1 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
534 L
18.9 cu ft
Length
4,996 mm
196.7 in
Height
1,503 mm
59.2 in
Range score
-
780 km
485 mi
Trunk score
507 L
17.9 cu ft
534 L
18.9 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
151 hp/t
112 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
137 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFord Taurus VII EcoBoost 245
Consumption8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.35 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi23.09 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,153 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Ford Taurus II SHO 3.2 V6 24V5

  • Is 314 kg lighter
  • Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 245

  • Has 22 hp more
  • Has 58 Nm more
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 27 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ford Taurus II SHO 3.2 V6 24V5
Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 245
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Ford Taurus II SHO 3.2 V6 24V5 vs Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 245 - car comparison - FastVsFaster