Jaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015
Car comparison
Jaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015 2.0vsFord Taurus VII EcoBoost 245
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord Taurus VII
EcoBoost 245
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.9 s
- Fastest top speed241 km/h150 mph
- Lightest1,735 kg3,825 lb
- Best power-to-weight138 hp/t103 kW/t7.2 kg/hp
- Best estimated range952 km592 mi
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best practicality score78/100
Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 245
- Most powerful245 hp183 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
- Best economy score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 240hp179kW | 245hp183kW |
| Torque | 340Nm251lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,735kg3,825lb | 1,794kg3,955lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,169kg4,782lb |
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.2s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 66.1s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.9s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.6s Calculated | 34.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.5s Calculated | 7.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 138hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated | 137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated | 195Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 952km592mi Calculated | 780km485mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,999cc122cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 5,130mm202in | 4,996mm197in |
| Width | 1,899mm75in | 1,878mm74in |
| Height | 1,460mm57in | 1,503mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 3,032mm119in | 2,949mm116in |
| Front track | 1,626mm64in | 1,608mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,604mm63in | 1,618mm64in |
| Ground clearance | - | 133mm5in |
| Trunk volume | - | 534L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 64L |
| CO2 emissions | 199g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0: Power / Torque
- Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 245: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 5,500 rpm | 2,000-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 | 5,500 rpm | 1,750-4,500 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.5 s | 7.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.9 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.6 s | 34.7 s |
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.3 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 153 km/h 95 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 240 hp 179 kW |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 | 245 hp 183 kW |
Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 245 has 5 hp more than Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0 and Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 245: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 1,735 kg 3,825 lb |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 | 1,794 kg 3,955 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 | 218 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 7.9 s |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 | 7.9 s |
Although Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 245 has more power, Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 952 km 592 mi |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 | 780 km 485 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 240 hp 179 kW | 7.9 s | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 | 245 hp 183 kW | 7.9 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 |
| 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 240 hp 179 kW | 245 hp 183 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.9 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,735 kg 3,825 lb | 1,794 kg 3,955 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 952 km 592 mi | 780 km 485 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 199 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 534 L 18.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0 | Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 245 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK | 8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.70 LC100 km | 14.35 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi | 23.09 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal | 1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,205 LC/year | 2,153 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0
- Is 59 kg lighter
- Has 23 km/h (14 mph) higher top speed
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 172 km (107 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 245
- Has 5 hp more
- Has 10 Nm more
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























