Car comparison

Jaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015 2.0vsFord Taurus VII EcoBoost 245

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015

2.0

240 hp1999 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2015-2018
VS

Ford Taurus VII

EcoBoost 245

245 hp1999 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedSedan2015-2019

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    241 km/h
    150 mph
  • Lightest
    1,735 kg
    3,825 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    138 hp/t
    103 kW/t
    7.2 kg/hp
  • Best estimated range
    952 km
    592 mi
  • Best overall score
    60/100
  • Best performance score
    52/100
  • Best practicality score
    78/100

Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 245

  • Most powerful
    245 hp
    183 kW
  • Highest torque
    350 Nm
    258 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.2 L/100 km
    28.7 mpg US
    34.4 mpg UK
  • Best economy score
    85/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245
Power
240hp179kW
245hp183kW
Torque
340Nm251lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
1,735kg3,825lb
1,794kg3,955lb
Gross weight-
2,169kg4,782lb
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
To 99% top speed
80.2s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
66.1s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.9s
7.9s
0-200 km/h
28.6s
Calculated
34.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.5s
Calculated
7.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.7s
Calculated
15.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
138hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb
Calculated
137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton
Calculated
195Nm/t131lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
952km592mi
Calculated
780km485mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,999cc122cu in
1,999cc122cu in
Length
5,130mm202in
4,996mm197in
Width
1,899mm75in
1,878mm74in
Height
1,460mm57in
1,503mm59in
Wheelbase
3,032mm119in
2,949mm116in
Front track
1,626mm64in
1,608mm63in
Rear track
1,604mm63in
1,618mm64in
Ground clearance-
133mm5in
Trunk volume-
534L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
80L
64L
CO2 emissions
199g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 245PowerTorque
  • Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 245: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.05,500 rpm2,000-4,000 rpm5,750 rpm
FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 2455,500 rpm1,750-4,500 rpm6,500 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.5 s
7.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.9 s
7.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
28.6 s
34.7 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.8 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.4 s
10.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.3 s
13.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.7 s
15.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
153 km/h
95 mph
151 km/h
94 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
240 hp
179 kW
FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245
245 hp
183 kW

Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 245 has 5 hp more than Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0.

The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0 and Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 245: 5 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
340 Nm
251 lb-ft
FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
1,735 kg
3,825 lb
FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245
1,794 kg
3,955 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
241 km/h
150 mph
FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245
218 km/h
135 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.07.9 s
FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 2457.9 s

Although Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 245 has more power, Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
138 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245
137 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
952 km
592 mi
FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245
780 km
485 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
240 hp
179 kW
7.9 s
241 km/h
150 mph
FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245
245 hp
183 kW
7.9 s
218 km/h
135 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
5,130 mm
202.0 in
Height
1,460 mm
57.5 in
FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245
Power
245 hp
183 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
534 L
18.9 cu ft
Length
4,996 mm
196.7 in
Height
1,503 mm
59.2 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245
Power
245 hp
183 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK

Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
7.9 s
FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
7.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
138 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245
137 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245
Power
240 hp
179 kW
245 hp
183 kW
Torque
340 Nm
251 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.9 s
7.9 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
Lightness
1,735 kg
3,825 lb
1,794 kg
3,955 lb
Fuel consumption
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
5,130 mm
202.0 in
Height
1,460 mm
57.5 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
534 L
18.9 cu ft
Length
4,996 mm
196.7 in
Height
1,503 mm
59.2 in
Range score
952 km
592 mi
780 km
485 mi
CO2 score
199 g/km
-
Trunk score
-
534 L
18.9 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
138 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
137 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 245
Consumption8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.70 LC100 km14.35 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi23.66 LC100 mi23.09 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,205 LC/year2,153 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0

  • Is 59 kg lighter
  • Has 23 km/h (14 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 172 km (107 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 245

  • Has 5 hp more
  • Has 10 Nm more
  • Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar XJ (X351) 2.0
Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 245
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Jaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015 2.0 vs Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 245 - car comparison - FastVsFaster