Car comparison

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0vsFord Taurus VII EcoBoost 245

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar XF (X260)

2.0

250 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2017-2018
VS

Ford Taurus VII

EcoBoost 245

245 hp1999 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedSedan2015-2019

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.6 s
  • Fastest top speed
    237 km/h
    147 mph
  • Most powerful
    250 hp
    186 kW
  • Highest torque
    365 Nm
    269 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,685 kg
    3,715 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    148 hp/t
    111 kW/t
    6.7 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.9 L/100 km
    34.1 mpg US
    40.9 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,072 km
    666 mi
  • Largest trunk
    540 L
  • Best overall score
    63/100
  • Best performance score
    57/100
  • Best economy score
    88/100
  • Best practicality score
    77/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarXF (X260)2.0FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245
Power
250hp186kW
245hp183kW
Torque
365Nm269lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
1,685kg3,715lb
1,794kg3,955lb
Gross weight-
2,169kg4,782lb
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
To 99% top speed
59.9s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph
Calculated
66.1s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.6s
7.9s
0-200 km/h
23.4s
Calculated
34.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.3s
Calculated
7.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.6s
Calculated
15.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
148hp/t111kW/t67hp/1000 lb
Calculated
137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
217Nm/t145lb-ft/ton
Calculated
195Nm/t131lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,072km666mi
Calculated
780km485mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,997cc122cu in
1,999cc122cu in
Length
4,954mm195in
4,996mm197in
Width
1,880mm74in
1,878mm74in
Height
1,457mm57in
1,503mm59in
Wheelbase
2,960mm117in
2,949mm116in
Front track
1,605mm63in
1,608mm63in
Rear track
1,594mm63in
1,618mm64in
Ground clearance-
133mm5in
Trunk volume
540L
534L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
74L
64L
CO2 emissions
159g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 245PowerTorque
  • Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 245: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarXF (X260)2.05,500 rpm1,200-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm
FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 2455,500 rpm1,750-4,500 rpm6,500 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarXF (X260)2.0FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.3 s
7.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.6 s
7.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
23.4 s
34.7 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.7 s
10.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.4 s
13.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.6 s
15.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
164 km/h
102 mph
151 km/h
94 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
250 hp
186 kW
FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245
245 hp
183 kW

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0 has 5 hp more than Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 245.

The biggest power difference is between Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 245 and Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0: 5 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
365 Nm
269 lb-ft
FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
1,685 kg
3,715 lb
FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245
1,794 kg
3,955 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
237 km/h
147 mph
FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245
218 km/h
135 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.06.6 s
FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 2457.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0 and Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 245: 1.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0 and Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 245: 1.3 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
148 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245
137 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
1,072 km
666 mi
FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245
780 km
485 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
250 hp
186 kW
6.6 s
237 km/h
147 mph
FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245
245 hp
183 kW
7.9 s
218 km/h
135 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,954 mm
195.0 in
Height
1,457 mm
57.4 in
FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245
Power
245 hp
183 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
534 L
18.9 cu ft
Length
4,996 mm
196.7 in
Height
1,503 mm
59.2 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245
Power
245 hp
183 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
6.6 s
FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
7.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
148 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245
137 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarXF (X260)2.0FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245
Power
250 hp
186 kW
245 hp
183 kW
Torque
365 Nm
269 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.6 s
7.9 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
Lightness
1,685 kg
3,715 lb
1,794 kg
3,955 lb
Fuel consumption
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,954 mm
195.0 in
Height
1,457 mm
57.4 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
534 L
18.9 cu ft
Length
4,996 mm
196.7 in
Height
1,503 mm
59.2 in
Range score
1,072 km
666 mi
780 km
485 mi
CO2 score
159 g/km
-
Trunk score
540 L
19.1 cu ft
534 L
18.9 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
148 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
137 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar XF (X260) 2.0Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 245
Consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.08 LC100 km14.35 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi19.43 LC100 mi23.09 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,811 LC/year2,153 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0

  • Has 5 hp more
  • Has 15 Nm more
  • Is 109 kg lighter
  • Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 19 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 292 km (181 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 6 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 245

No measurable advantages in the available data.

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0
Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 245
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0
2.0i
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0vsJaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
EcoBoost 245
SHO 3.2 V6 24V5
VS
FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245vsFordTaurus IISHO 3.2 V6 24V5
2.0
2.0
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0vsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0
EcoBoost 245
1.5 EcoBoost
VS
FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245vsFordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost
2.0
2.0i
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0vsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
EcoBoost 245
2.0
VS
FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245vsJaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
2.0
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0vsJaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8
EcoBoost 245
350 V6
VS
FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245vsLexusES VI (XV60)Facelift 2015350 V6
2.0
R-S 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0vsJaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
EcoBoost 245
E 300
VS
FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300
2.0
2.0
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0vsJaguarXE (X760)2.0
EcoBoost 245
3.0d V6
VS
FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245vsMaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 20173.0d V6
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0 vs Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 245 - car comparison - FastVsFaster