Jaguar XF (X250) · Facelift 2011
Car comparison
Jaguar XF (X250) · Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8vsJaguar XF (X260) 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XF (X260)
2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XF (X250) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.6 s
- Fastest top speed315 km/h196 mph Unrestricted300 km/h186 mph Restricted
- Most powerful550 hp410 kW
- Highest torque680 Nm502 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight293 hp/t219 kW/t3.4 kg/hp
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best overall score84/100
- Best performance score88/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0
- Lightest1,685 kg3,715 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions159 g/km
- Best estimated range1,072 km666 mi
- Best economy score88/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | JaguarXF (X260)2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 550hp410kW | 250hp186kW |
| Torque | 680Nm502lb-ft | 365Nm269lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,875kg4,134lb | 1,685kg3,715lb |
| Gross weight | 2,400kg5,291lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph Calculated | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 49.9s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph Calculated | 59.9s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.6s | 6.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.6s Calculated | 23.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.4s Calculated | 6.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.9L/100 km13.9mpg US16.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 12.2s Calculated | 14.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 293hp/t219kW/t133hp/1000 lb Calculated | 148hp/t111kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 363Nm/t243lb-ft/ton Calculated | 217Nm/t145lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 604km376mi Calculated | 1,072km666mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,000cc305cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,981mm196in | 4,954mm195in |
| Width | 1,939mm76in | 1,880mm74in |
| Height | 1,468mm58in | 1,457mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,909mm115in | 2,960mm117in |
| Front track | 1,549mm61in | 1,605mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,563mm62in | 1,594mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 540L | 540L |
| Max trunk volume | 963L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 74L |
| CO2 emissions | 270g/km | 159g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XF (X250) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | 6,500 rpm | 2,500-5,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | JaguarXF (X260)2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.4 s | 6.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.6 s | 6.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.6 s | 23.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph Likely limited | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.3 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.4 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.2 s | 14.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 206 km/h 128 mph | 164 km/h 102 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | 550 hp 410 kW |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | 250 hp 186 kW |
Jaguar XF (X250) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8 has 300 hp more than Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0 and Jaguar XF (X250) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8: 300 hp (224 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | 1,875 kg 4,134 lb |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | 1,685 kg 3,715 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | 237 km/h 147 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | 4.6 s |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | 6.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XF (X250) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8 and Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0: 2.0 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0 and Jaguar XF (X250) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8: 4.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | 293 hp/t 219 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | 148 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | 604 km 376 mi |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | 1,072 km 666 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | 550 hp 410 kW | 4.6 s | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | 250 hp 186 kW | 6.6 s | 237 km/h 147 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 |
| 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XF (X250) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | 293 hp/t 219 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | 148 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 550 hp 410 kW | 250 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.6 s | 6.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph | 237 km/h 147 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,875 kg 4,134 lb | 1,685 kg 3,715 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 604 km 376 mi | 1,072 km 666 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 270 g/km | 159 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 293 hp/t 219 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 148 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XF (X250) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8 | Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.6 L/100 km20.3 mpg US24.4 mpg UK | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.30 LC100 km | 12.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.67 LC100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,740 L460 US gal383 UK gal | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,045 LC/year | 1,811 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XF (X250) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8
- Has 300 hp more
- Has 315 Nm more
- Is 2.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 78 km/h (48 mph) higher top speed
- Has 145 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0
- Is 190 kg lighter
- Uses 4.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 468 km (291 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 111 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























