Car comparison

Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 i V6 24VvsFord Taurus II SHO 3.2 V6 24V5

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Alfa Romeo 164 (164)

3.0 i V6 24V

230 hp2959 ccGasolineAWDManualNaturally aspiratedSedan1991-1995
VS

Ford Taurus II

SHO 3.2 V6 24V5

223 hp3191 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedSedan1993-1995

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 i V6 24V

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    245 km/h
    152 mph
  • Most powerful
    230 hp
    172 kW
  • Best power-to-weight
    152 hp/t
    114 kW/t
    6.6 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    59/100
  • Best performance score
    52/100
  • Best economy score
    82/100
  • Best practicality score
    75/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAlfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 i V6 24VFordTaurus IISHO 3.2 V6 24V5
Power
230hp172kW
223hp166kW
Torque
284Nm209lb-ft
292Nm215lb-ft
Curb weight
1,510kg3,329lb
1,480kg3,263lb
Gross weight
1,935kg4,266lb
-
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
224 km/h
139 mph
To 99% top speed
73.3s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph
Calculated
70.8s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.7s
8.4s
0-200 km/h
26.0s
Calculated
33.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.3s
Calculated
8.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption city
13.4L/100 km17.6mpg US21.1mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
15.5s
Calculated
16.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
152hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb
Calculated
151hp/t112kW/t68hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
188Nm/t126lb-ft/ton
Calculated
197Nm/t132lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
745km463mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
2,959cc181cu in
3,191cc195cu in
Length
4,550mm179in
4,877mm192in
Width
1,760mm69in
1,808mm71in
Height
1,390mm55in
1,374mm54in
Wheelbase
2,660mm105in
2,692mm106in
Front track
1,515mm60in
1,562mm61in
Rear track
1,490mm59in
1,537mm61in
Trunk volume
505L
507L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
70L
70L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 i V6 24VFord Taurus II SHO 3.2 V6 24V5PowerTorque
  • Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 i V6 24V: Power / Torque
  • Ford Taurus II SHO 3.2 V6 24V5: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 i V6 24V6,300 rpm5,000 rpm6,550 rpm
FordTaurus IISHO 3.2 V6 24V56,000 rpm4,800 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAlfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 i V6 24VFordTaurus IISHO 3.2 V6 24V5
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.3 s
8.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.7 s
8.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
26.0 s
33.4 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
224 km/h
139 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.8 s
2.9 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
7.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.4 s
10.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.2 s
13.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.5 s
16.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
157 km/h
98 mph
150 km/h
93 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 i V6 24V
230 hp
172 kW
FordTaurus IISHO 3.2 V6 24V5
223 hp
166 kW

Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 i V6 24V has 7 hp more than Ford Taurus II SHO 3.2 V6 24V5.

The biggest power difference is between Ford Taurus II SHO 3.2 V6 24V5 and Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 i V6 24V: 7 hp (5 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 i V6 24V
284 Nm
209 lb-ft
FordTaurus IISHO 3.2 V6 24V5
292 Nm
215 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 i V6 24V
1,510 kg
3,329 lb
FordTaurus IISHO 3.2 V6 24V5
1,480 kg
3,263 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 i V6 24V
245 km/h
152 mph
FordTaurus IISHO 3.2 V6 24V5
224 km/h
139 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 i V6 24V7.7 s
FordTaurus IISHO 3.2 V6 24V58.4 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 i V6 24V and Ford Taurus II SHO 3.2 V6 24V5: 0.7 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 i V6 24V
152 hp/t
114 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
FordTaurus IISHO 3.2 V6 24V5
151 hp/t
112 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 i V6 24V
230 hp
172 kW
7.7 s
245 km/h
152 mph
FordTaurus IISHO 3.2 V6 24V5
223 hp
166 kW
8.4 s
224 km/h
139 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 i V6 24V
Power
230 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,550 mm
179.1 in
Height
1,390 mm
54.7 in
FordTaurus IISHO 3.2 V6 24V5
Power
223 hp
166 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
224 km/h
139 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
507 L
17.9 cu ft
Length
4,877 mm
192.0 in
Height
1,374 mm
54.1 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAlfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 i V6 24VFordTaurus IISHO 3.2 V6 24V5
Power
230 hp
172 kW
223 hp
166 kW
Torque
284 Nm
209 lb-ft
292 Nm
215 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.7 s
8.4 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
224 km/h
139 mph
Lightness
1,510 kg
3,329 lb
1,480 kg
3,263 lb
Fuel consumption
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
-
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,550 mm
179.1 in
Height
1,390 mm
54.7 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
507 L
17.9 cu ft
Length
4,877 mm
192.0 in
Height
1,374 mm
54.1 in
Range score
745 km
463 mi
-
Trunk score
505 L
17.8 cu ft
507 L
17.9 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
152 hp/t
114 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
151 hp/t
112 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAlfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 i V6 24V
Consumption9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km16.45 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi26.47 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,468 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 i V6 24V

  • Has 7 hp more
  • Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 21 km/h (13 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Ford Taurus II SHO 3.2 V6 24V5

  • Has 8 Nm more
  • Is 30 kg lighter
  • Has 2 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 i V6 24V
Ford Taurus II SHO 3.2 V6 24V5
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.0 i V6 24V
2.2i Turbo 20V
VS
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 i V6 24VvsAUDIS22.2i Turbo 20V
SHO 3.2 V6 24V5
EcoBoost 245
VS
FordTaurus IISHO 3.2 V6 24V5vsFordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245
3.0 i V6 24V
2.5 i V6 24V
VS
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 i V6 24VvsAlfa Romeo156 (932)2.5 i V6 24V
SHO 3.2 V6 24V5
3.2i 24V
VS
FordTaurus IISHO 3.2 V6 24V5vsHondaLegend II (KA7)3.2i 24V
SHO 3.2 V6 24V5
300
VS
FordTaurus IISHO 3.2 V6 24V5vsLexusGS I300
3.0 i V6 24V
185i V8
VS
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 i V6 24VvsHSVClubsport (VR/VS)185i V8
SHO 3.2 V6 24V5
3.0 24V QV
VS
FordTaurus IISHO 3.2 V6 24V5vsAlfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV
3.0 i V6 24V
E 2.5-16 Evolution II
VS
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 i V6 24VvsMercedes-Benz190 (W201)Facelift 1988E 2.5-16 Evolution II
3.0 i V6 24V
740i
VS
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 i V6 24VvsBMW7 Series (E32)Facelift 1992740i
SHO 3.2 V6 24V5
2.8 V6 30V
VS
FordTaurus IISHO 3.2 V6 24V5vsAUDIA6 (4A/C4)2.8 V6 30V
3.0 i V6 24V
4.2
VS
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 i V6 24VvsAUDIV8 (D11)4.2
3.0 i V6 24V
540i V8
VS
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 i V6 24VvsBMW5 Series (E34)540i V8
Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 i V6 24V vs Ford Taurus II SHO 3.2 V6 24V5 - car comparison - FastVsFaster