Alfa Romeo 164 (164)
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V QVvsFord Taurus II SHO 3.2 V6 24V5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord Taurus II
SHO 3.2 V6 24V5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V QV
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.7 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Most powerful232 hp173 kW
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score82/100
Ford Taurus II SHO 3.2 V6 24V5
- Highest torque292 Nm215 lb-ft
- Lightest1,480 kg3,263 lb
- Best power-to-weight151 hp/t112 kW/t6.6 kg/hp
- Largest trunk507 L
- Best practicality score75/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV | FordTaurus IISHO 3.2 V6 24V5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 232hp173kW | 223hp166kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 292Nm215lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,680kg3,704lb | 1,480kg3,263lb |
| Gross weight | 2,165kg4,773lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 76.9s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 70.8s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.7s | 8.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.6s Calculated | 33.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.3s Calculated | 8.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.5L/100 km17.4mpg US20.9mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 16.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 138hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated | 151hp/t112kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 167Nm/t112lb-ft/ton Calculated | 197Nm/t132lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 798km496mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,959cc181cu in | 3,191cc195cu in |
| Length | 4,555mm179in | 4,877mm192in |
| Width | 1,760mm69in | 1,808mm71in |
| Height | 1,356mm53in | 1,374mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,660mm105in | 2,692mm106in |
| Front track | 1,532mm60in | 1,562mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,506mm59in | 1,537mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 410L | 507L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 75L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V QV: Power / Torque
- Ford Taurus II SHO 3.2 V6 24V5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV | 6,300 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
| FordTaurus IISHO 3.2 V6 24V5 | 6,000 rpm | 4,800 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV | FordTaurus IISHO 3.2 V6 24V5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.3 s | 8.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.7 s | 8.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.6 s | 33.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 7.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 16.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV | 232 hp 173 kW |
| FordTaurus IISHO 3.2 V6 24V5 | 223 hp 166 kW |
Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V QV has 9 hp more than Ford Taurus II SHO 3.2 V6 24V5.
The biggest power difference is between Ford Taurus II SHO 3.2 V6 24V5 and Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V QV: 9 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| FordTaurus IISHO 3.2 V6 24V5 | 292 Nm 215 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV | 1,680 kg 3,704 lb |
| FordTaurus IISHO 3.2 V6 24V5 | 1,480 kg 3,263 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| FordTaurus IISHO 3.2 V6 24V5 | 224 km/h 139 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV | 7.7 s |
| FordTaurus IISHO 3.2 V6 24V5 | 8.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V QV and Ford Taurus II SHO 3.2 V6 24V5: 0.7 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
| FordTaurus IISHO 3.2 V6 24V5 | 151 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV | 232 hp 173 kW | 7.7 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| FordTaurus IISHO 3.2 V6 24V5 | 223 hp 166 kW | 8.4 s | 224 km/h 139 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordTaurus IISHO 3.2 V6 24V5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV | FordTaurus IISHO 3.2 V6 24V5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 232 hp 173 kW | 223 hp 166 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 292 Nm 215 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.7 s | 8.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | 224 km/h 139 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,680 kg 3,704 lb | 1,480 kg 3,263 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 798 km 496 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 410 L 14.5 cu ft | 507 L 17.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 151 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V QV |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,468 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V QV
- Has 9 hp more
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 26 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Ford Taurus II SHO 3.2 V6 24V5
- Has 12 Nm more
- Is 200 kg lighter
- Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 97 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























