Holden Commodore (VT)
Car comparison
Holden Commodore (VT) 5.0 i V8 SSvsAlfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V QV
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo 164 (164)
3.0 24V QV
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Holden Commodore (VT) 5.0 i V8 SS
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.0 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Most powerful243 hp181 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,600 kg3,527 lb
- Best power-to-weight152 hp/t113 kW/t6.6 kg/hp
- Largest trunk475 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score58/100
- Best practicality score75/100
Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V QV
- Best economy score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | HoldenCommodore (VT)5.0 i V8 SS | Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 243hp181kW | 232hp173kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,600kg3,527lb | 1,680kg3,704lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,165kg4,773lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 70.2s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 76.9s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.0s | 7.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.3s Calculated | 25.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.7s Calculated | 7.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 13.5L/100 km17.4mpg US20.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 152hp/t113kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated | 138hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 250Nm/t167lb-ft/ton Calculated | 167Nm/t112lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 798km496mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,981cc304cu in | 2,959cc181cu in |
| Length | 4,885mm192in | 4,555mm179in |
| Width | 1,840mm72in | 1,760mm69in |
| Height | 1,450mm57in | 1,356mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,790mm110in | 2,660mm105in |
| Front track | 1,570mm62in | 1,532mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,585mm62in | 1,506mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 475L | 410L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 73L | 75L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Holden Commodore (VT) 5.0 i V8 SS: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V QV: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.0 i V8 SS | 4,800 rpm | 3,600 rpm | 5,050 rpm |
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV | 6,300 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | HoldenCommodore (VT)5.0 i V8 SS | Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.7 s | 7.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.0 s | 7.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.3 s | 25.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 162 km/h 101 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.0 i V8 SS | 243 hp 181 kW |
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV | 232 hp 173 kW |
Holden Commodore (VT) 5.0 i V8 SS has 11 hp more than Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V QV.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V QV and Holden Commodore (VT) 5.0 i V8 SS: 11 hp (8 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.0 i V8 SS | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.0 i V8 SS | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb |
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV | 1,680 kg 3,704 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.0 i V8 SS | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.0 i V8 SS | 7.0 s |
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV | 7.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Holden Commodore (VT) 5.0 i V8 SS and Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V QV: 0.7 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.0 i V8 SS | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.0 i V8 SS | 243 hp 181 kW | 7.0 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV | 232 hp 173 kW | 7.7 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.0 i V8 SS |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | HoldenCommodore (VT)5.0 i V8 SS | Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 243 hp 181 kW | 232 hp 173 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.0 s | 7.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb | 1,680 kg 3,704 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 798 km 496 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 475 L 16.8 cu ft | 410 L 14.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V QV |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,468 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Holden Commodore (VT) 5.0 i V8 SS
- Has 11 hp more
- Has 120 Nm more
- Is 80 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 65 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V QV
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























