Holden Commodore (VT)
Car comparison
Holden Commodore (VT) 5.0 i V8 SSvsNissan Cedric (Y34) 3.0i V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonNissan Cedric (Y34)
3.0i V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Holden Commodore (VT) 5.0 i V8 SS
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.0 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Most powerful243 hp181 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,600 kg3,527 lb
- Best power-to-weight152 hp/t113 kW/t6.6 kg/hp
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score58/100
Nissan Cedric (Y34) 3.0i V6
- Best economy score76/100
- Best practicality score78/100
Specification comparison
| Model | HoldenCommodore (VT)5.0 i V8 SS | NissanCedric (Y34)3.0i V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 243hp181kW | 240hp179kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 309Nm228lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,600kg3,527lb | 1,600kg3,527lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,875kg4,134lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 70.2s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 69.4s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.0s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.3s Calculated | 27.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.7s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 152hp/t113kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated | 150hp/t112kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 250Nm/t167lb-ft/ton Calculated | 193Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 702km436mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,981cc304cu in | 2,987cc182cu in |
| Length | 4,885mm192in | 4,860mm191in |
| Width | 1,840mm72in | 1,770mm70in |
| Height | 1,450mm57in | 1,450mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,790mm110in | 2,800mm110in |
| Front track | 1,570mm62in | 1,510mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,585mm62in | 1,510mm59in |
| Ground clearance | - | 150mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 475L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 73L | 80L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Holden Commodore (VT) 5.0 i V8 SS: Power / Torque
- Nissan Cedric (Y34) 3.0i V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.0 i V8 SS | 4,800 rpm | 3,600 rpm | 5,050 rpm |
| NissanCedric (Y34)3.0i V6 | 6,400 rpm | 3,600 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | HoldenCommodore (VT)5.0 i V8 SS | NissanCedric (Y34)3.0i V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.7 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.0 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.3 s | 27.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 162 km/h 101 mph | 156 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.0 i V8 SS | 243 hp 181 kW |
| NissanCedric (Y34)3.0i V6 | 240 hp 179 kW |
Holden Commodore (VT) 5.0 i V8 SS has 3 hp more than Nissan Cedric (Y34) 3.0i V6.
The biggest power difference is between Nissan Cedric (Y34) 3.0i V6 and Holden Commodore (VT) 5.0 i V8 SS: 3 hp (2 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.0 i V8 SS | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| NissanCedric (Y34)3.0i V6 | 309 Nm 228 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.0 i V8 SS | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb |
| NissanCedric (Y34)3.0i V6 | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.0 i V8 SS | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| NissanCedric (Y34)3.0i V6 | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.0 i V8 SS | 7.0 s |
| NissanCedric (Y34)3.0i V6 | 7.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Holden Commodore (VT) 5.0 i V8 SS and Nissan Cedric (Y34) 3.0i V6: 0.5 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.0 i V8 SS | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
| NissanCedric (Y34)3.0i V6 | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.0 i V8 SS | 243 hp 181 kW | 7.0 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| NissanCedric (Y34)3.0i V6 | 240 hp 179 kW | 7.5 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.0 i V8 SS |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| NissanCedric (Y34)3.0i V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | HoldenCommodore (VT)5.0 i V8 SS | NissanCedric (Y34)3.0i V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 243 hp 181 kW | 240 hp 179 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 309 Nm 228 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.0 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 702 km 436 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 475 L 16.8 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Nissan Cedric (Y34) 3.0i V6 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.4 L/100 km20.6 mpg US24.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.95 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.11 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,710 L452 US gal376 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,993 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Holden Commodore (VT) 5.0 i V8 SS
- Has 3 hp more
- Has 91 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Nissan Cedric (Y34) 3.0i V6
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























