Car comparison

Holden Commodore (VT) 5.0 i V8 SSvsNissan Cedric (Y34) 3.0i V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Holden Commodore (VT)

5.0 i V8 SS

243 hp4981 ccGasolineRWDManualNaturally aspiratedSedan1998-2000
VS

Nissan Cedric (Y34)

3.0i V6

240 hp2987 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedSedan1999-2001

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Holden Commodore (VT) 5.0 i V8 SS

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.0 s
  • Fastest top speed
    250 km/h
    155 mph Unrestricted
    240 km/h
    149 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    243 hp
    181 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,600 kg
    3,527 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    152 hp/t
    113 kW/t
    6.6 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    63/100
  • Best performance score
    58/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelHoldenCommodore (VT)5.0 i V8 SSNissanCedric (Y34)3.0i V6
Power
243hp181kW
240hp179kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
309Nm228lb-ft
Curb weight
1,600kg3,527lb
1,600kg3,527lb
Gross weight-
1,875kg4,134lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Calculated
235 km/h
146 mph
To 99% top speed
70.2s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph
Calculated
69.4s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.0s
7.5s
0-200 km/h
23.3s
Calculated
27.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.7s
Calculated
7.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption-
11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.9s
Calculated
15.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
152hp/t113kW/t69hp/1000 lb
Calculated
150hp/t112kW/t68hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
250Nm/t167lb-ft/ton
Calculated
193Nm/t129lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range-
702km436mi
Calculated
Displacement
4,981cc304cu in
2,987cc182cu in
Length
4,885mm192in
4,860mm191in
Width
1,840mm72in
1,770mm70in
Height
1,450mm57in
1,450mm57in
Wheelbase
2,790mm110in
2,800mm110in
Front track
1,570mm62in
1,510mm59in
Rear track
1,585mm62in
1,510mm59in
Ground clearance-
150mm6in
Trunk volume
475L
-
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
73L
80L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Holden Commodore (VT) 5.0 i V8 SSNissan Cedric (Y34) 3.0i V6PowerTorque
  • Holden Commodore (VT) 5.0 i V8 SS: Power / Torque
  • Nissan Cedric (Y34) 3.0i V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
HoldenCommodore (VT)5.0 i V8 SS4,800 rpm3,600 rpm5,050 rpm
NissanCedric (Y34)3.0i V66,400 rpm3,600 rpm6,650 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricHoldenCommodore (VT)5.0 i V8 SSNissanCedric (Y34)3.0i V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.7 s
7.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.0 s
7.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
23.3 s
27.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Likely limited
235 km/h
146 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.9 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.6 s
13.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.9 s
15.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
162 km/h
101 mph
156 km/h
97 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HoldenCommodore (VT)5.0 i V8 SS
243 hp
181 kW
NissanCedric (Y34)3.0i V6
240 hp
179 kW

Holden Commodore (VT) 5.0 i V8 SS has 3 hp more than Nissan Cedric (Y34) 3.0i V6.

The biggest power difference is between Nissan Cedric (Y34) 3.0i V6 and Holden Commodore (VT) 5.0 i V8 SS: 3 hp (2 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HoldenCommodore (VT)5.0 i V8 SS
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
NissanCedric (Y34)3.0i V6
309 Nm
228 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HoldenCommodore (VT)5.0 i V8 SS
1,600 kg
3,527 lb
NissanCedric (Y34)3.0i V6
1,600 kg
3,527 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HoldenCommodore (VT)5.0 i V8 SS
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
NissanCedric (Y34)3.0i V6
235 km/h
146 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HoldenCommodore (VT)5.0 i V8 SS7.0 s
NissanCedric (Y34)3.0i V67.5 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Holden Commodore (VT) 5.0 i V8 SS and Nissan Cedric (Y34) 3.0i V6: 0.5 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HoldenCommodore (VT)5.0 i V8 SS
152 hp/t
113 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
NissanCedric (Y34)3.0i V6
150 hp/t
112 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
HoldenCommodore (VT)5.0 i V8 SS
243 hp
181 kW
7.0 s
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
NissanCedric (Y34)3.0i V6
240 hp
179 kW
7.5 s
235 km/h
146 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
HoldenCommodore (VT)5.0 i V8 SS
Power
243 hp
181 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
475 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
4,885 mm
192.3 in
Height
1,450 mm
57.1 in
NissanCedric (Y34)3.0i V6
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,860 mm
191.3 in
Height
1,450 mm
57.1 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleHoldenCommodore (VT)5.0 i V8 SSNissanCedric (Y34)3.0i V6
Power
243 hp
181 kW
240 hp
179 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
309 Nm
228 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.0 s
7.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
235 km/h
146 mph
Lightness
1,600 kg
3,527 lb
1,600 kg
3,527 lb
Fuel consumption
-
11.4 L/100 km
20.6 mpg US
24.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
475 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
4,885 mm
192.3 in
Height
1,450 mm
57.1 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,860 mm
191.3 in
Height
1,450 mm
57.1 in
Range score
-
702 km
436 mi
Trunk score
475 L
16.8 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
152 hp/t
113 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
150 hp/t
112 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleNissan Cedric (Y34) 3.0i V6
Consumption11.4 L/100 km20.6 mpg US24.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km19.95 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi32.11 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,710 L452 US gal376 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,993 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Holden Commodore (VT) 5.0 i V8 SS

  • Has 3 hp more
  • Has 91 Nm more
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Holden Commodore (VT) 5.0 i V8 SS
Nissan Cedric (Y34) 3.0i V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Holden Commodore (VT) 5.0 i V8 SS vs Nissan Cedric (Y34) 3.0i V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster