Alfa Romeo 164 (164)
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V QVvsHonda Legend II (KA7) 3.2i 24V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonHonda Legend II (KA7)
3.2i 24V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V QV
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.7 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Most powerful232 hp173 kW
- Best power-to-weight138 hp/t103 kW/t7.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.4 L/100 km25.0 mpg US30.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range798 km496 mi
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score82/100
Honda Legend II (KA7) 3.2i 24V
- Highest torque293 Nm216 lb-ft
- Lightest1,550 kg3,417 lb
- Largest trunk427 L
- Best practicality score73/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV | HondaLegend II (KA7)3.2i 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 232hp173kW | 205hp153kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 293Nm216lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,680kg3,704lb | 1,550kg3,417lb |
| Gross weight | 2,165kg4,773lb | 2,150kg4,740lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 76.9s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 70.6s99% target: 221 km/h / 137 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.7s | 8.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.6s Calculated | 33.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.3s Calculated | 7.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.5L/100 km17.4mpg US20.9mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 15.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 138hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated | 132hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 167Nm/t112lb-ft/ton Calculated | 189Nm/t126lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 798km496mi Calculated | 630km391mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,959cc181cu in | 3,206cc196cu in |
| Length | 4,555mm179in | 4,950mm195in |
| Width | 1,760mm69in | 1,810mm71in |
| Height | 1,356mm53in | 1,410mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,660mm105in | 2,910mm115in |
| Front track | 1,532mm60in | 1,550mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,506mm59in | 1,540mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 410L | 427L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 75L | 68L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V QV: Power / Torque
- Honda Legend II (KA7) 3.2i 24V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV | 6,300 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
| HondaLegend II (KA7)3.2i 24V | 5,500 rpm | 4,400 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV | HondaLegend II (KA7)3.2i 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.3 s | 7.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.7 s | 8.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.6 s | 33.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 15.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 150 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV | 232 hp 173 kW |
| HondaLegend II (KA7)3.2i 24V | 205 hp 153 kW |
Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V QV has 27 hp more than Honda Legend II (KA7) 3.2i 24V.
The biggest power difference is between Honda Legend II (KA7) 3.2i 24V and Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V QV: 27 hp (20 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| HondaLegend II (KA7)3.2i 24V | 293 Nm 216 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV | 1,680 kg 3,704 lb |
| HondaLegend II (KA7)3.2i 24V | 1,550 kg 3,417 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| HondaLegend II (KA7)3.2i 24V | 223 km/h 139 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV | 7.7 s |
| HondaLegend II (KA7)3.2i 24V | 8.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V QV and Honda Legend II (KA7) 3.2i 24V: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| HondaLegend II (KA7)3.2i 24V | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V QV and Honda Legend II (KA7) 3.2i 24V: 1.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
| HondaLegend II (KA7)3.2i 24V | 132 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV | 798 km 496 mi |
| HondaLegend II (KA7)3.2i 24V | 630 km 391 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV | 232 hp 173 kW | 7.7 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| HondaLegend II (KA7)3.2i 24V | 205 hp 153 kW | 8.1 s | 223 km/h 139 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| HondaLegend II (KA7)3.2i 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| HondaLegend II (KA7)3.2i 24V |
| 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V QV is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
| HondaLegend II (KA7)3.2i 24V | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | 8.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| HondaLegend II (KA7)3.2i 24V | 132 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV | HondaLegend II (KA7)3.2i 24V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 232 hp 173 kW | 205 hp 153 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 293 Nm 216 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.7 s | 8.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | 223 km/h 139 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,680 kg 3,704 lb | 1,550 kg 3,417 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 798 km 496 mi | 630 km 391 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 410 L 14.5 cu ft | 427 L 15.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 132 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V QV | Honda Legend II (KA7) 3.2i 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK | 10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.45 LC100 km | 18.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi | 30.42 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal | 1,620 L428 US gal356 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,468 LC/year | 2,835 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V QV
- Has 27 hp more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 27 km/h (17 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 168 km (105 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Honda Legend II (KA7) 3.2i 24V
- Has 13 Nm more
- Is 130 kg lighter
- Has 17 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























