Car comparison

Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 i V6 24VvsHonda Legend II (KA7) 3.2i 24V

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Alfa Romeo 164 (164)

3.0 i V6 24V

230 hp2959 ccGasolineAWDManualNaturally aspiratedSedan1991-1995
VS

Honda Legend II (KA7)

3.2i 24V

205 hp3206 ccGasolineFWDManualNaturally aspiratedSedan1991-1996

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 i V6 24V

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    245 km/h
    152 mph
  • Most powerful
    230 hp
    172 kW
  • Lightest
    1,510 kg
    3,329 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    152 hp/t
    114 kW/t
    6.6 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    9.4 L/100 km
    25.0 mpg US
    30.1 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    745 km
    463 mi
  • Largest trunk
    505 L
  • Best overall score
    59/100
  • Best performance score
    52/100
  • Best economy score
    82/100
  • Best practicality score
    75/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAlfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 i V6 24VHondaLegend II (KA7)3.2i 24V
Power
230hp172kW
205hp153kW
Torque
284Nm209lb-ft
293Nm216lb-ft
Curb weight
1,510kg3,329lb
1,550kg3,417lb
Gross weight
1,935kg4,266lb
2,150kg4,740lb
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
223 km/h
139 mph
To 99% top speed
73.3s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph
Calculated
70.6s99% target: 221 km/h / 137 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.7s
8.1s
0-200 km/h
26.0s
Calculated
33.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.3s
Calculated
7.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK
10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
13.4L/100 km17.6mpg US21.1mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
15.5s
Calculated
15.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
152hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb
Calculated
132hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
188Nm/t126lb-ft/ton
Calculated
189Nm/t126lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
745km463mi
Calculated
630km391mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,959cc181cu in
3,206cc196cu in
Length
4,550mm179in
4,950mm195in
Width
1,760mm69in
1,810mm71in
Height
1,390mm55in
1,410mm56in
Wheelbase
2,660mm105in
2,910mm115in
Front track
1,515mm60in
1,550mm61in
Rear track
1,490mm59in
1,540mm61in
Trunk volume
505L
427L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
70L
68L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 i V6 24VHonda Legend II (KA7) 3.2i 24VPowerTorque
  • Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 i V6 24V: Power / Torque
  • Honda Legend II (KA7) 3.2i 24V: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 i V6 24V6,300 rpm5,000 rpm6,550 rpm
HondaLegend II (KA7)3.2i 24V5,500 rpm4,400 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAlfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 i V6 24VHondaLegend II (KA7)3.2i 24V
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.3 s
7.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.7 s
8.1 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
26.0 s
33.4 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
223 km/h
139 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.8 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
7.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.4 s
10.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.2 s
13.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.5 s
15.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
157 km/h
98 mph
150 km/h
94 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 i V6 24V
230 hp
172 kW
HondaLegend II (KA7)3.2i 24V
205 hp
153 kW

Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 i V6 24V has 25 hp more than Honda Legend II (KA7) 3.2i 24V.

The biggest power difference is between Honda Legend II (KA7) 3.2i 24V and Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 i V6 24V: 25 hp (19 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 i V6 24V
284 Nm
209 lb-ft
HondaLegend II (KA7)3.2i 24V
293 Nm
216 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 i V6 24V
1,510 kg
3,329 lb
HondaLegend II (KA7)3.2i 24V
1,550 kg
3,417 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 i V6 24V
245 km/h
152 mph
HondaLegend II (KA7)3.2i 24V
223 km/h
139 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 i V6 24V7.7 s
HondaLegend II (KA7)3.2i 24V8.1 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 i V6 24V and Honda Legend II (KA7) 3.2i 24V: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 i V6 24V
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
HondaLegend II (KA7)3.2i 24V
10.8 L/100 km
21.8 mpg US
26.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 i V6 24V and Honda Legend II (KA7) 3.2i 24V: 1.4 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 i V6 24V
152 hp/t
114 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
HondaLegend II (KA7)3.2i 24V
132 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 i V6 24V
745 km
463 mi
HondaLegend II (KA7)3.2i 24V
630 km
391 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 i V6 24V
230 hp
172 kW
7.7 s
245 km/h
152 mph
HondaLegend II (KA7)3.2i 24V
205 hp
153 kW
8.1 s
223 km/h
139 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 i V6 24V
Power
230 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,550 mm
179.1 in
Height
1,390 mm
54.7 in
HondaLegend II (KA7)3.2i 24V
Power
205 hp
153 kW
0-100 km/h8.1 s
Top speed
223 km/h
139 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
427 L
15.1 cu ft
Length
4,950 mm
194.9 in
Height
1,410 mm
55.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 i V6 24V
Power
230 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
HondaLegend II (KA7)3.2i 24V
Power
205 hp
153 kW
0-100 km/h8.1 s
Top speed
223 km/h
139 mph
10.8 L/100 km
21.8 mpg US
26.2 mpg UK

Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 i V6 24V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 i V6 24V
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
7.7 s
HondaLegend II (KA7)3.2i 24V
10.8 L/100 km
21.8 mpg US
26.2 mpg UK
8.1 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 i V6 24V
152 hp/t
114 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
HondaLegend II (KA7)3.2i 24V
132 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
10.8 L/100 km
21.8 mpg US
26.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAlfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 i V6 24VHondaLegend II (KA7)3.2i 24V
Power
230 hp
172 kW
205 hp
153 kW
Torque
284 Nm
209 lb-ft
293 Nm
216 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.7 s
8.1 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
223 km/h
139 mph
Lightness
1,510 kg
3,329 lb
1,550 kg
3,417 lb
Fuel consumption
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
10.8 L/100 km
21.8 mpg US
26.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,550 mm
179.1 in
Height
1,390 mm
54.7 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
427 L
15.1 cu ft
Length
4,950 mm
194.9 in
Height
1,410 mm
55.5 in
Range score
745 km
463 mi
630 km
391 mi
Trunk score
505 L
17.8 cu ft
427 L
15.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
152 hp/t
114 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
132 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAlfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 i V6 24VHonda Legend II (KA7) 3.2i 24V
Consumption9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km16.45 LC100 km18.90 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi26.47 LC100 mi30.42 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal1,620 L428 US gal356 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,468 LC/year2,835 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 i V6 24V

  • Has 25 hp more
  • Is 40 kg lighter
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 22 km/h (14 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 115 km (71 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 78 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Honda Legend II (KA7) 3.2i 24V

  • Has 9 Nm more

Pros

  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 i V6 24V
Honda Legend II (KA7) 3.2i 24V
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.0 i V6 24V
2.2i Turbo 20V
VS
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 i V6 24VvsAUDIS22.2i Turbo 20V
3.2i 24V
300
VS
HondaLegend II (KA7)3.2i 24VvsLexusGS I300
3.0 i V6 24V
SHO 3.2 V6 24V5
VS
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 i V6 24VvsFordTaurus IISHO 3.2 V6 24V5
3.0 i V6 24V
2.5 i V6 24V
VS
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 i V6 24VvsAlfa Romeo156 (932)2.5 i V6 24V
3.2i 24V
2.8 V6 30V
VS
HondaLegend II (KA7)3.2i 24VvsAUDIA6 (4A/C4)2.8 V6 30V
3.0 i V6 24V
185i V8
VS
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 i V6 24VvsHSVClubsport (VR/VS)185i V8
3.2i 24V
E 2.5-16
VS
HondaLegend II (KA7)3.2i 24VvsMercedes-Benz190 (W201)Facelift 1988E 2.5-16
3.2i 24V
3.0 24V QV
VS
HondaLegend II (KA7)3.2i 24VvsAlfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV
3.2i 24V
2.4 i-VTEC
VS
HondaLegend II (KA7)3.2i 24VvsHondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC
3.0 i V6 24V
740i
VS
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 i V6 24VvsBMW7 Series (E32)Facelift 1992740i
3.0 i V6 24V
4.2
VS
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 i V6 24VvsAUDIV8 (D11)4.2
3.2i 24V
2.4 i-VTEC 16V
VS
HondaLegend II (KA7)3.2i 24VvsHondaAccord VII2.4 i-VTEC 16V
Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 i V6 24V vs Honda Legend II (KA7) 3.2i 24V - car comparison - FastVsFaster