Car comparison

Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V QVvsBMW 3 Series Sedan (E36) 328i

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Alfa Romeo 164 (164)

3.0 24V QV

232 hp2959 ccGasolineAWDManualNaturally aspiratedSedan1992-1998
VS

BMW 3 Series Sedan (E36)

328i

193 hp2793 ccGasolineRWDManualNaturally aspiratedSedan1995-1999

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW 3 Series Sedan (E36) 328i

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.3 s
  • Lightest
    1,395 kg
    3,075 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    138 hp/t
    103 kW/t
    7.2 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.5 L/100 km
    27.7 mpg US
    33.2 mpg UK
  • Largest trunk
    435 L
  • Best economy score
    84/100
  • Best practicality score
    72/100

Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V QV

  • Fastest top speed
    250 km/h
    155 mph Unrestricted
    240 km/h
    149 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    232 hp
    173 kW
  • Highest torque
    280 Nm
    207 lb-ft
  • Best estimated range
    798 km
    496 mi
  • Best overall score
    58/100
  • Best performance score
    52/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAlfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QVBMW3 Series Sedan (E36)328i
Power
232hp173kW
193hp144kW
Torque
280Nm207lb-ft
280Nm207lb-ft
Curb weight
1,680kg3,704lb
1,395kg3,075lb
Gross weight
2,165kg4,773lb
1,780kg3,924lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Calculated
236 km/h
147 mph
To 99% top speed
76.9s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph
Calculated
63.2s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.7s
7.3s
0-200 km/h
25.6s
Calculated
25.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.3s
Calculated
7.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK
8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
13.5L/100 km17.4mpg US20.9mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
15.5s
Calculated
15.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
138hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb
Calculated
138hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
167Nm/t112lb-ft/ton
Calculated
201Nm/t134lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
798km496mi
Calculated
765km475mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,959cc181cu in
2,793cc170cu in
Length
4,555mm179in
4,433mm175in
Width
1,760mm69in
1,698mm67in
Height
1,356mm53in
1,393mm55in
Wheelbase
2,660mm105in
2,700mm106in
Front track
1,532mm60in
1,408mm55in
Rear track
1,506mm59in
1,421mm56in
Trunk volume
410L
435L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
75L
65L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V QVBMW 3 Series Sedan (E36) 328iPowerTorque
  • Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V QV: Power / Torque
  • BMW 3 Series Sedan (E36) 328i: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV6,300 rpm5,000 rpm6,550 rpm
BMW3 Series Sedan (E36)328i5,500 rpm3,950 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAlfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QVBMW3 Series Sedan (E36)328i
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.3 s
7.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.7 s
7.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
25.6 s
25.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Likely limited
236 km/h
147 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.8 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.4 s
10.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.2 s
12.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.5 s
15.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
158 km/h
98 mph
160 km/h
99 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV
232 hp
173 kW
BMW3 Series Sedan (E36)328i
193 hp
144 kW

Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V QV has 39 hp more than BMW 3 Series Sedan (E36) 328i.

The biggest power difference is between BMW 3 Series Sedan (E36) 328i and Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V QV: 39 hp (29 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
BMW3 Series Sedan (E36)328i
280 Nm
207 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV
1,680 kg
3,704 lb
BMW3 Series Sedan (E36)328i
1,395 kg
3,075 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
BMW3 Series Sedan (E36)328i
236 km/h
147 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV7.7 s
BMW3 Series Sedan (E36)328i7.3 s

Although Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V QV has more power, BMW 3 Series Sedan (E36) 328i is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 3 Series Sedan (E36) 328i and Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V QV: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
BMW3 Series Sedan (E36)328i
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW 3 Series Sedan (E36) 328i and Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V QV: 0.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV
138 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
BMW3 Series Sedan (E36)328i
138 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV
798 km
496 mi
BMW3 Series Sedan (E36)328i
765 km
475 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV
232 hp
173 kW
7.7 s
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
BMW3 Series Sedan (E36)328i
193 hp
144 kW
7.3 s
236 km/h
147 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV
Power
232 hp
173 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
410 L
14.5 cu ft
Length
4,555 mm
179.3 in
Height
1,356 mm
53.4 in
BMW3 Series Sedan (E36)328i
Power
193 hp
144 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
236 km/h
147 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
435 L
15.4 cu ft
Length
4,433 mm
174.5 in
Height
1,393 mm
54.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV
Power
232 hp
173 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
BMW3 Series Sedan (E36)328i
Power
193 hp
144 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
236 km/h
147 mph
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK

BMW 3 Series Sedan (E36) 328i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
7.7 s
BMW3 Series Sedan (E36)328i
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK
7.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV
138 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
BMW3 Series Sedan (E36)328i
138 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAlfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QVBMW3 Series Sedan (E36)328i
Power
232 hp
173 kW
193 hp
144 kW
Torque
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.7 s
7.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
236 km/h
147 mph
Lightness
1,680 kg
3,704 lb
1,395 kg
3,075 lb
Fuel consumption
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
410 L
14.5 cu ft
Length
4,555 mm
179.3 in
Height
1,356 mm
53.4 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
435 L
15.4 cu ft
Length
4,433 mm
174.5 in
Height
1,393 mm
54.8 in
Range score
798 km
496 mi
765 km
475 mi
Trunk score
410 L
14.5 cu ft
435 L
15.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
138 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
138 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAlfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V QVBMW 3 Series Sedan (E36) 328i
Consumption9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km16.45 LC100 km14.88 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi26.47 LC100 mi23.94 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal1,275 L337 US gal280 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,468 LC/year2,231 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V QV

  • Has 39 hp more
  • Has 14 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 33 km (21 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

BMW 3 Series Sedan (E36) 328i

  • Is 285 kg lighter
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 0 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 25 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V QV
BMW 3 Series Sedan (E36) 328i
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V QV vs BMW 3 Series Sedan (E36) 328i - car comparison - FastVsFaster