Alfa Romeo 164 (164)
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V QVvsBMW 3 Series Sedan (E36) 328i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW 3 Series Sedan (E36)
328i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 3 Series Sedan (E36) 328i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Lightest1,395 kg3,075 lb
- Best power-to-weight138 hp/t103 kW/t7.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK
- Largest trunk435 L
- Best economy score84/100
- Best practicality score72/100
Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V QV
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Most powerful232 hp173 kW
- Highest torque280 Nm207 lb-ft
- Best estimated range798 km496 mi
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score52/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV | BMW3 Series Sedan (E36)328i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 232hp173kW | 193hp144kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,680kg3,704lb | 1,395kg3,075lb |
| Gross weight | 2,165kg4,773lb | 1,780kg3,924lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 76.9s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 63.2s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.7s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.6s Calculated | 25.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.3s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.5L/100 km17.4mpg US20.9mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 138hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated | 138hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 167Nm/t112lb-ft/ton Calculated | 201Nm/t134lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 798km496mi Calculated | 765km475mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,959cc181cu in | 2,793cc170cu in |
| Length | 4,555mm179in | 4,433mm175in |
| Width | 1,760mm69in | 1,698mm67in |
| Height | 1,356mm53in | 1,393mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,660mm105in | 2,700mm106in |
| Front track | 1,532mm60in | 1,408mm55in |
| Rear track | 1,506mm59in | 1,421mm56in |
| Trunk volume | 410L | 435L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 75L | 65L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V QV: Power / Torque
- BMW 3 Series Sedan (E36) 328i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV | 6,300 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E36)328i | 5,500 rpm | 3,950 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV | BMW3 Series Sedan (E36)328i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.3 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.7 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.6 s | 25.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 160 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV | 232 hp 173 kW |
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E36)328i | 193 hp 144 kW |
Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V QV has 39 hp more than BMW 3 Series Sedan (E36) 328i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW 3 Series Sedan (E36) 328i and Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V QV: 39 hp (29 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E36)328i | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV | 1,680 kg 3,704 lb |
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E36)328i | 1,395 kg 3,075 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E36)328i | 236 km/h 147 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV | 7.7 s |
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E36)328i | 7.3 s |
Although Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V QV has more power, BMW 3 Series Sedan (E36) 328i is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 3 Series Sedan (E36) 328i and Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V QV: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E36)328i | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW 3 Series Sedan (E36) 328i and Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V QV: 0.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E36)328i | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV | 798 km 496 mi |
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E36)328i | 765 km 475 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV | 232 hp 173 kW | 7.7 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E36)328i | 193 hp 144 kW | 7.3 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E36)328i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E36)328i |
| 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 3 Series Sedan (E36) 328i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E36)328i | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E36)328i | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV | BMW3 Series Sedan (E36)328i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 232 hp 173 kW | 193 hp 144 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.7 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,680 kg 3,704 lb | 1,395 kg 3,075 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 798 km 496 mi | 765 km 475 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 410 L 14.5 cu ft | 435 L 15.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V QV | BMW 3 Series Sedan (E36) 328i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK | 8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.45 LC100 km | 14.88 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi | 23.94 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal | 1,275 L337 US gal280 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,468 LC/year | 2,231 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V QV
- Has 39 hp more
- Has 14 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 33 km (21 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
BMW 3 Series Sedan (E36) 328i
- Is 285 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 0 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 25 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























