Cadillac CT6 II
Car comparison
Cadillac CT6 II 28TvsBYD Seal · Facelift 2026 Comfort 61.4 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBYD Seal · Facelift 2026
Comfort 61.4 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Cadillac CT6 II 28T
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.5 s
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Most powerful237 hp177 kW
- Lightest1,760 kg3,880 lb
- Best power-to-weight135 hp/t100 kW/t7.4 kg/hp
- Largest trunk508 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score76/100
BYD Seal Facelift 2026 Comfort 61.4 kWh
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | CadillacCT6 II28T | BYDSealFacelift 2026Comfort 61.4 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 237hp177kW | 231hp172kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,760kg3,880lb | 1,970kg4,343lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,380kg5,247lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 72.5s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 70.3s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.5s Calculated | 27.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 135hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated | 117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton Calculated | 193Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 935km581mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | - |
| Length | 5,223mm206in | 4,800mm189in |
| Width | 1,890mm74in | 1,875mm74in |
| Height | 1,480mm58in | 1,460mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 3,109mm122in | 2,920mm115in |
| Front track | 1,631mm64in | 1,620mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,652mm65in | 1,625mm64in |
| Trunk volume | 508L | 485L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 72L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CadillacCT6 II28T | BYDSealFacelift 2026Comfort 61.4 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.5 s | 27.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 156 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCT6 II28T | 237 hp 177 kW |
| BYDSealFacelift 2026Comfort 61.4 kWh | 231 hp 172 kW |
Cadillac CT6 II 28T has 6 hp more than BYD Seal Facelift 2026 Comfort 61.4 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between BYD Seal Facelift 2026 Comfort 61.4 kWh and Cadillac CT6 II 28T: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCT6 II28T | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| BYDSealFacelift 2026Comfort 61.4 kWh | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCT6 II28T | 1,760 kg 3,880 lb |
| BYDSealFacelift 2026Comfort 61.4 kWh | 1,970 kg 4,343 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCT6 II28T | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| BYDSealFacelift 2026Comfort 61.4 kWh | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCT6 II28T | 7.5 s |
| BYDSealFacelift 2026Comfort 61.4 kWh | 7.5 s |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCT6 II28T | 135 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
| BYDSealFacelift 2026Comfort 61.4 kWh | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacCT6 II28T | 237 hp 177 kW | 7.5 s | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| BYDSealFacelift 2026Comfort 61.4 kWh | 231 hp 172 kW | 7.5 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacCT6 II28T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BYDSealFacelift 2026Comfort 61.4 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CadillacCT6 II28T | BYDSealFacelift 2026Comfort 61.4 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 237 hp 177 kW | 231 hp 172 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,760 kg 3,880 lb | 1,970 kg 4,343 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 935 km 581 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 508 L 17.9 cu ft | 485 L 17.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 135 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cadillac CT6 II 28T |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.48 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,021 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cadillac CT6 II 28T
- Has 6 hp more
- Is 210 kg lighter
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 23 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
BYD Seal Facelift 2026 Comfort 61.4 kWh
- Has 30 Nm more
Pros
- Highest torque
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























