Car comparison

Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8vsMaybach 62 S (V240) · Facelift 2010 6.0 V12

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Bentley Mulsanne II

6.75 V8

512 hp6752 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2010-2016
VS

Maybach 62 S (V240) · Facelift 2010

6.0 V12

630 hp5980 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2010-2013

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Maybach 62 S (V240) Facelift 2010 6.0 V12

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.1 s
  • Most powerful
    630 hp
    470 kW
  • Best power-to-weight
    227 hp/t
    169 kW/t
    4.4 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    15.8 L/100 km
    14.9 mpg US
    17.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    24.6 L/100 km
    9.6 mpg US
    11.5 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    696 km
    433 mi
  • Largest trunk
    605 L
  • Best overall score
    80/100
  • Best economy score
    65/100
  • Best practicality score
    77/100

Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8

  • Fastest top speed
    296 km/h
    184 mph
  • Highest torque
    1,020 Nm
    752 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    2,585 kg
    5,699 lb
  • Lowest highway consumption
    11.8 L/100 km
    19.9 mpg US
    23.9 mpg UK
  • Best performance score
    82/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12
Power
512hp382kW
630hp470kW
Torque
1,020Nm752lb-ft
1,000Nm738lb-ft
Curb weight
2,585kg5,699lb
2,780kg6,129lb
Gross weight
3,090kg6,812lb
3,380kg7,452lb
Top speed
296 km/h
184 mph
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
275 km/h171 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
66.8s99% target: 293 km/h / 182 mph
Calculated
62.2s99% target: 287 km/h / 178 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.3s
5.1s
0-200 km/h
15.2s
Calculated
14.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.1s
Calculated
4.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
16.9L/100 km13.9mpg US16.7mpg UK
15.8L/100 km14.9mpg US17.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
25.3L/100 km9.3mpg US11.2mpg UK
24.6L/100 km9.6mpg US11.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK
11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.2s
Calculated
13.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
198hp/t148kW/t90hp/1000 lb
Calculated
227hp/t169kW/t103hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
395Nm/t264lb-ft/ton
Calculated
360Nm/t241lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
568km353mi
Calculated
696km433mi
Calculated
Displacement
6,752cc412cu in
5,980cc365cu in
Length
5,575mm219in
6,171mm243in
Width
1,926mm76in
1,980mm78in
Height
1,521mm60in
1,573mm62in
Wheelbase
3,266mm129in
3,827mm151in
Front track
1,615mm64in
1,675mm66in
Rear track
1,652mm65in
1,695mm67in
Trunk volume
443L
605L
Doors
4
4
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
96L
110L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8Maybach 62 S (V240) Facelift 2010 6.0 V12PowerTorque
  • Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8: Power / Torque
  • Maybach 62 S (V240) Facelift 2010 6.0 V12: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V84,200 rpm1,750 rpm4,450 rpm
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V124,800-5,100 rpm2,000-4,000 rpm5,350 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.1 s
4.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.3 s
5.1 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
15.2 s
14.8 s
Top speed
296 km/h
184 mph
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
275 km/h171 mph
Limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
6.0 s
5.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.8 s
8.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.2 s
11.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.2 s
13.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
185 km/h
115 mph
187 km/h
116 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8
512 hp
382 kW
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12
630 hp
470 kW

Maybach 62 S (V240) Facelift 2010 6.0 V12 has 118 hp more than Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8 and Maybach 62 S (V240) Facelift 2010 6.0 V12: 118 hp (88 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8
1,020 Nm
752 lb-ft
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12
1,000 Nm
738 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8
2,585 kg
5,699 lb
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12
2,780 kg
6,129 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8
296 km/h
184 mph
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
275 km/h171 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Maybach 62 S (V240) Facelift 2010 6.0 V12 and Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8
16.9 L/100 km
13.9 mpg US
16.7 mpg UK
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12
15.8 L/100 km
14.9 mpg US
17.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Maybach 62 S (V240) Facelift 2010 6.0 V12 and Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8: 1.1 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8
198 hp/t
148 kW/t
5.0 kg/hp
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12
227 hp/t
169 kW/t
4.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8
568 km
353 mi
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12
696 km
433 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8
512 hp
382 kW
5.3 s
296 km/h
184 mph
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12
630 hp
470 kW
5.1 s
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
275 km/h171 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8
Power
512 hp
382 kW
0-100 km/h5.3 s
Top speed
296 km/h
184 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
443 L
15.6 cu ft
Length
5,575 mm
219.5 in
Height
1,521 mm
59.9 in
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12
Power
630 hp
470 kW
0-100 km/h5.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
275 km/h171 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
605 L
21.4 cu ft
Length
6,171 mm
243.0 in
Height
1,573 mm
61.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8
Power
512 hp
382 kW
0-100 km/h5.3 s
Top speed
296 km/h
184 mph
16.9 L/100 km
13.9 mpg US
16.7 mpg UK
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12
Power
630 hp
470 kW
0-100 km/h5.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
275 km/h171 mph
15.8 L/100 km
14.9 mpg US
17.9 mpg UK

Maybach 62 S (V240) Facelift 2010 6.0 V12 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8
16.9 L/100 km
13.9 mpg US
16.7 mpg UK
5.3 s
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12
15.8 L/100 km
14.9 mpg US
17.9 mpg UK
5.1 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8
198 hp/t
148 kW/t
5.0 kg/hp
16.9 L/100 km
13.9 mpg US
16.7 mpg UK
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12
227 hp/t
169 kW/t
4.4 kg/hp
15.8 L/100 km
14.9 mpg US
17.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12
Power
512 hp
382 kW
630 hp
470 kW
Torque
1,020 Nm
752 lb-ft
1,000 Nm
738 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.3 s
5.1 s
Top speed
296 km/h
184 mph
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
275 km/h171 mph
Lightness
2,585 kg
5,699 lb
2,780 kg
6,129 lb
Fuel consumption
16.9 L/100 km
13.9 mpg US
16.7 mpg UK
15.8 L/100 km
14.9 mpg US
17.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
443 L
15.6 cu ft
Length
5,575 mm
219.5 in
Height
1,521 mm
59.9 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
605 L
21.4 cu ft
Length
6,171 mm
243.0 in
Height
1,573 mm
61.9 in
Range score
568 km
353 mi
696 km
433 mi
Trunk score
443 L
15.6 cu ft
605 L
21.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
198 hp/t
148 kW/t
5.0 kg/hp
227 hp/t
169 kW/t
4.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8Maybach 62 S (V240) Facelift 2010 6.0 V12
Consumption16.9 L/100 km13.9 mpg US16.7 mpg UK15.8 L/100 km14.9 mpg US17.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km29.57 LC100 km27.65 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi47.60 LC100 mi44.50 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used2,535 L670 US gal558 UK gal2,370 L626 US gal521 UK gal
Annual fuel cost4,436 LC/year4,148 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8

  • Has 20 Nm more
  • Is 195 kg lighter
  • Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk

Maybach 62 S (V240) Facelift 2010 6.0 V12

  • Has 118 hp more
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 29 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 128 km (80 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 162 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8
Maybach 62 S (V240) 6.0 V12
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8 vs Maybach 62 S (V240) · Facelift 2010 6.0 V12 - car comparison - FastVsFaster