Bentley Mulsanne II
Car comparison
Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8vsMaybach 62 S (V240) · Facelift 2010 6.0 V12
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMaybach 62 S (V240) · Facelift 2010
6.0 V12
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Maybach 62 S (V240) Facelift 2010 6.0 V12
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.1 s
- Most powerful630 hp470 kW
- Best power-to-weight227 hp/t169 kW/t4.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption15.8 L/100 km14.9 mpg US17.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption24.6 L/100 km9.6 mpg US11.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range696 km433 mi
- Largest trunk605 L
- Best overall score80/100
- Best economy score65/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8
- Fastest top speed296 km/h184 mph
- Highest torque1,020 Nm752 lb-ft
- Lightest2,585 kg5,699 lb
- Lowest highway consumption11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK
- Best performance score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 512hp382kW | 630hp470kW |
| Torque | 1,020Nm752lb-ft | 1,000Nm738lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,585kg5,699lb | 2,780kg6,129lb |
| Gross weight | 3,090kg6,812lb | 3,380kg7,452lb |
| Top speed | 296 km/h 184 mph | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 66.8s99% target: 293 km/h / 182 mph Calculated | 62.2s99% target: 287 km/h / 178 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.3s | 5.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.2s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.1s Calculated | 4.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 16.9L/100 km13.9mpg US16.7mpg UK | 15.8L/100 km14.9mpg US17.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 25.3L/100 km9.3mpg US11.2mpg UK | 24.6L/100 km9.6mpg US11.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.2s Calculated | 13.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 198hp/t148kW/t90hp/1000 lb Calculated | 227hp/t169kW/t103hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 395Nm/t264lb-ft/ton Calculated | 360Nm/t241lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 568km353mi Calculated | 696km433mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 6,752cc412cu in | 5,980cc365cu in |
| Length | 5,575mm219in | 6,171mm243in |
| Width | 1,926mm76in | 1,980mm78in |
| Height | 1,521mm60in | 1,573mm62in |
| Wheelbase | 3,266mm129in | 3,827mm151in |
| Front track | 1,615mm64in | 1,675mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,652mm65in | 1,695mm67in |
| Trunk volume | 443L | 605L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 96L | 110L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8: Power / Torque
- Maybach 62 S (V240) Facelift 2010 6.0 V12: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | 4,200 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
| Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12 | 4,800-5,100 rpm | 2,000-4,000 rpm | 5,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.1 s | 4.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.3 s | 5.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.2 s | 14.8 s |
| Top speed | 296 km/h 184 mph | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.8 s | 8.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.2 s | 11.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.2 s | 13.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 185 km/h 115 mph | 187 km/h 116 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | 512 hp 382 kW |
| Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12 | 630 hp 470 kW |
Maybach 62 S (V240) Facelift 2010 6.0 V12 has 118 hp more than Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8 and Maybach 62 S (V240) Facelift 2010 6.0 V12: 118 hp (88 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | 1,020 Nm 752 lb-ft |
| Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12 | 1,000 Nm 738 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | 2,585 kg 5,699 lb |
| Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12 | 2,780 kg 6,129 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | 296 km/h 184 mph |
| Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12 | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | 5.3 s |
| Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12 | 5.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Maybach 62 S (V240) Facelift 2010 6.0 V12 and Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK |
| Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12 | 15.8 L/100 km 14.9 mpg US 17.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Maybach 62 S (V240) Facelift 2010 6.0 V12 and Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | 198 hp/t 148 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp |
| Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12 | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | 568 km 353 mi |
| Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12 | 696 km 433 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | 512 hp 382 kW | 5.3 s | 296 km/h 184 mph |
| Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12 | 630 hp 470 kW | 5.1 s | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 |
| 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12 |
| 15.8 L/100 km 14.9 mpg US 17.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Maybach 62 S (V240) Facelift 2010 6.0 V12 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK | 5.3 s |
| Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12 | 15.8 L/100 km 14.9 mpg US 17.9 mpg UK | 5.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | 198 hp/t 148 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK |
| Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12 | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 15.8 L/100 km 14.9 mpg US 17.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 512 hp 382 kW | 630 hp 470 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 1,020 Nm 752 lb-ft | 1,000 Nm 738 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.3 s | 5.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 296 km/h 184 mph | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,585 kg 5,699 lb | 2,780 kg 6,129 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK | 15.8 L/100 km 14.9 mpg US 17.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 568 km 353 mi | 696 km 433 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 443 L 15.6 cu ft | 605 L 21.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 198 hp/t 148 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8 | Maybach 62 S (V240) Facelift 2010 6.0 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 16.9 L/100 km13.9 mpg US16.7 mpg UK | 15.8 L/100 km14.9 mpg US17.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 29.57 LC100 km | 27.65 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 47.60 LC100 mi | 44.50 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,535 L670 US gal558 UK gal | 2,370 L626 US gal521 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 4,436 LC/year | 4,148 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 195 kg lighter
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Maybach 62 S (V240) Facelift 2010 6.0 V12
- Has 118 hp more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 29 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 128 km (80 mi) more estimated range
- Has 162 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























