Car comparison

Maybach 62 S (V240) · Facelift 2010 6.0 V12vsCadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Maybach 62 S (V240) · Facelift 2010

6.0 V12

630 hp5980 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2010-2013
VS

Cadillac CTS II

V 6.2 V8

564 hp6162 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticSuperchargedSedan2008-2014

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.0 s
  • Lightest
    1,930 kg
    4,255 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    292 hp/t
    218 kW/t
    3.4 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    14.7 L/100 km
    16.0 mpg US
    19.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    16.8 L/100 km
    14.0 mpg US
    16.8 mpg UK
  • Best overall score
    82/100
  • Best performance score
    87/100
  • Best economy score
    67/100

Maybach 62 S (V240) Facelift 2010 6.0 V12

  • Fastest top speed
    290 km/h
    180 mph Unrestricted
    275 km/h
    171 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    630 hp
    470 kW
  • Highest torque
    1,000 Nm
    738 lb-ft
  • Lowest highway consumption
    11.8 L/100 km
    19.9 mpg US
    23.9 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    696 km
    433 mi
  • Largest trunk
    605 L
  • Best practicality score
    77/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMaybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
Power
630hp470kW
564hp421kW
Torque
1,000Nm738lb-ft
747Nm551lb-ft
Curb weight
2,780kg6,129lb
1,930kg4,255lb
Gross weight
3,380kg7,452lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
275 km/h171 mph
Calculated
282 km/h
175 mph
To 99% top speed
62.2s99% target: 287 km/h / 178 mph
Calculated
41.4s99% target: 279 km/h / 173 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.1s
4.0s
0-200 km/h
14.8s
Calculated
11.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.9s
Calculated
3.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
15.8L/100 km14.9mpg US17.9mpg UK
14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
24.6L/100 km9.6mpg US11.5mpg UK
16.8L/100 km14mpg US16.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK
12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.0s
Calculated
11.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
227hp/t169kW/t103hp/1000 lb
Calculated
292hp/t218kW/t133hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
360Nm/t241lb-ft/ton
Calculated
387Nm/t259lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
696km433mi
Calculated
463km287mi
Calculated
Displacement
5,980cc365cu in
6,162cc376cu in
Length
6,171mm243in
4,859mm191in
Width
1,980mm78in
1,842mm73in
Height
1,573mm62in
1,473mm58in
Wheelbase
3,827mm151in
2,880mm113in
Front track
1,675mm66in
1,575mm62in
Rear track
1,695mm67in
1,577mm62in
Trunk volume
605L
385L
Doors
4
4
Seats
4
5
Fuel tank
110L
68L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Maybach 62 S (V240) Facelift 2010 6.0 V12Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8PowerTorque
  • Maybach 62 S (V240) Facelift 2010 6.0 V12: Power / Torque
  • Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V124,800-5,100 rpm2,000-4,000 rpm5,350 rpm
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V86,100 rpm3,800 rpm6,350 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMaybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.9 s
3.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.1 s
4.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
14.8 s
11.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
275 km/h171 mph
Limited
282 km/h
175 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.1 s
330 ft
101 m
5.9 s
5.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.7 s
7.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.0 s
10.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.0 s
11.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
187 km/h
116 mph
205 km/h
127 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12
630 hp
470 kW
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
564 hp
421 kW

Maybach 62 S (V240) Facelift 2010 6.0 V12 has 66 hp more than Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 and Maybach 62 S (V240) Facelift 2010 6.0 V12: 66 hp (49 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12
1,000 Nm
738 lb-ft
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
747 Nm
551 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12
2,780 kg
6,129 lb
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
1,930 kg
4,255 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
275 km/h171 mph
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
282 km/h
175 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V125.1 s
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V84.0 s

Although Maybach 62 S (V240) Facelift 2010 6.0 V12 has more power, Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 and Maybach 62 S (V240) Facelift 2010 6.0 V12: 1.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12
15.8 L/100 km
14.9 mpg US
17.9 mpg UK
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
14.7 L/100 km
16.0 mpg US
19.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 and Maybach 62 S (V240) Facelift 2010 6.0 V12: 1.1 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12
227 hp/t
169 kW/t
4.4 kg/hp
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
292 hp/t
218 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12
696 km
433 mi
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
463 km
287 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12
630 hp
470 kW
5.1 s
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
275 km/h171 mph
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
564 hp
421 kW
4.0 s
282 km/h
175 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12
Power
630 hp
470 kW
0-100 km/h5.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
275 km/h171 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
605 L
21.4 cu ft
Length
6,171 mm
243.0 in
Height
1,573 mm
61.9 in
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
Power
564 hp
421 kW
0-100 km/h4.0 s
Top speed
282 km/h
175 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
385 L
13.6 cu ft
Length
4,859 mm
191.3 in
Height
1,473 mm
58.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12
Power
630 hp
470 kW
0-100 km/h5.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
275 km/h171 mph
15.8 L/100 km
14.9 mpg US
17.9 mpg UK
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
Power
564 hp
421 kW
0-100 km/h4.0 s
Top speed
282 km/h
175 mph
14.7 L/100 km
16.0 mpg US
19.2 mpg UK

Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12
15.8 L/100 km
14.9 mpg US
17.9 mpg UK
5.1 s
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
14.7 L/100 km
16.0 mpg US
19.2 mpg UK
4.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12
227 hp/t
169 kW/t
4.4 kg/hp
15.8 L/100 km
14.9 mpg US
17.9 mpg UK
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
292 hp/t
218 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp
14.7 L/100 km
16.0 mpg US
19.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMaybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
Power
630 hp
470 kW
564 hp
421 kW
Torque
1,000 Nm
738 lb-ft
747 Nm
551 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.1 s
4.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
275 km/h171 mph
282 km/h
175 mph
Lightness
2,780 kg
6,129 lb
1,930 kg
4,255 lb
Fuel consumption
15.8 L/100 km
14.9 mpg US
17.9 mpg UK
14.7 L/100 km
16.0 mpg US
19.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
605 L
21.4 cu ft
Length
6,171 mm
243.0 in
Height
1,573 mm
61.9 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
385 L
13.6 cu ft
Length
4,859 mm
191.3 in
Height
1,473 mm
58.0 in
Range score
696 km
433 mi
463 km
287 mi
Trunk score
605 L
21.4 cu ft
385 L
13.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
227 hp/t
169 kW/t
4.4 kg/hp
292 hp/t
218 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMaybach 62 S (V240) Facelift 2010 6.0 V12Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8
Consumption15.8 L/100 km14.9 mpg US17.9 mpg UK14.7 L/100 km16 mpg US19.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km27.65 LC100 km25.72 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi44.50 LC100 mi41.40 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used2,370 L626 US gal521 UK gal2,205 L582 US gal485 UK gal
Annual fuel cost4,148 LC/year3,859 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Maybach 62 S (V240) Facelift 2010 6.0 V12

  • Has 66 hp more
  • Has 253 Nm more
  • Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 234 km (145 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 220 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8

  • Is 850 kg lighter
  • Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 66 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Maybach 62 S (V240) 6.0 V12
Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

6.0 V12
Speed 6.0i W12
VS
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12vsBentleyContinental Flying SpurSpeed 6.0i W12
V 6.2 V8
V 6.2 V8
VS
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8vsCadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8
6.0 V12
6.0 W12
VS
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12vsBentleyFlying Spur II6.0 W12
V 6.2 V8
V 6.0 i V8
VS
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8vsCadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8
6.0 V12
AMG S 63 V8
VS
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12vsMercedes-BenzS-class (W221)Facelift 2009AMG S 63 V8
6.0 V12
V 6.2 V8
VS
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12vsCadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
V 6.2 V8
R 5.0 V8 Supercharged
VS
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8vsJaguarXJ (X351)R 5.0 V8 Supercharged
6.0 V12
6.3 FSI W12
VS
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12vsAUDIA8L (D4/4H)6.3 FSI W12
V 6.2 V8
AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO
VS
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO
6.0 V12
760i
VS
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12vsBMW7 Series (F01 LCI)Facelift 2012760i
V 6.2 V8
R-S 5.0 V8
VS
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8vsJaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
6.0 V12
760i
VS
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12vsBMW7 Series (F01)760i
Maybach 62 S (V240) · Facelift 2010 6.0 V12 vs Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster