Cadillac CTS II
Car comparison
Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8vsCadillac CTS I V 6.0 i V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCadillac CTS I
V 6.0 i V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.0 s
- Fastest top speed282 km/h175 mph
- Most powerful564 hp421 kW
- Highest torque747 Nm551 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight292 hp/t218 kW/t3.4 kg/hp
- Largest trunk385 L
- Best overall score82/100
- Best performance score87/100
- Best economy score67/100
Cadillac CTS I V 6.0 i V8
- Lightest1,780 kg3,924 lb
- Lowest city consumption14.7 L/100 km16.0 mpg US19.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.4 L/100 km25.0 mpg US30.1 mpg UK
- Best practicality score72/100
Specification comparison
| Model | CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 | CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 564hp421kW | 405hp302kW |
| Torque | 747Nm551lb-ft | 536Nm395lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,930kg4,255lb | 1,780kg3,924lb |
| Top speed | 282 km/h 175 mph | 262 km/h 163 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 41.4s99% target: 279 km/h / 173 mph Calculated | 46.2s99% target: 259 km/h / 161 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.0s | 4.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.2s Calculated | 14.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.8s Calculated | 4.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.8L/100 km14mpg US16.8mpg UK | 14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.7s Calculated | 12.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 292hp/t218kW/t133hp/1000 lb Calculated | 228hp/t170kW/t103hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 387Nm/t259lb-ft/ton Calculated | 301Nm/t201lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 463km287mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 6,162cc376cu in | 5,967cc364cu in |
| Length | 4,859mm191in | 4,864mm191in |
| Width | 1,842mm73in | 1,793mm71in |
| Height | 1,473mm58in | 1,455mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,880mm113in | 2,880mm113in |
| Front track | 1,575mm62in | 1,552mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,577mm62in | 1,559mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 385L | - |
| Max trunk volume | - | 362L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 68L | 66L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8: Power / Torque
- Cadillac CTS I V 6.0 i V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 | 6,100 rpm | 3,800 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
| CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 | 6,000 rpm | 6,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 | CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.8 s | 4.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.0 s | 4.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.2 s | 14.1 s |
| Top speed | 282 km/h 175 mph | 262 km/h 163 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.3 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.8 s | 8.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.0 s | 10.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.7 s | 12.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 205 km/h 127 mph | 189 km/h 118 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 | 564 hp 421 kW |
| CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 | 405 hp 302 kW |
Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 has 159 hp more than Cadillac CTS I V 6.0 i V8.
The biggest power difference is between Cadillac CTS I V 6.0 i V8 and Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8: 159 hp (119 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 | 747 Nm 551 lb-ft |
| CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 | 536 Nm 395 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 | 1,930 kg 4,255 lb |
| CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 | 1,780 kg 3,924 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 | 282 km/h 175 mph |
| CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 | 262 km/h 163 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 | 4.0 s |
| CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 | 4.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 and Cadillac CTS I V 6.0 i V8: 0.6 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 | 292 hp/t 218 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp |
| CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 | 228 hp/t 170 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 | 564 hp 421 kW | 4.0 s | 282 km/h 175 mph |
| CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 | 405 hp 302 kW | 4.6 s | 262 km/h 163 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 | CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 564 hp 421 kW | 405 hp 302 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 747 Nm 551 lb-ft | 536 Nm 395 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.0 s | 4.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 282 km/h 175 mph | 262 km/h 163 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,930 kg 4,255 lb | 1,780 kg 3,924 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 463 km 287 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 385 L 13.6 cu ft | 362 L 12.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 292 hp/t 218 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 228 hp/t 170 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.7 L/100 km16 mpg US19.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 25.72 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 41.40 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,205 L582 US gal485 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,859 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8
- Has 159 hp more
- Has 211 Nm more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 65 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 23 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Cadillac CTS I V 6.0 i V8
- Is 150 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























