Car comparison

Cadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6vsCadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Cadillac ATS Sedan

V 3.6 V6

471 hp3564 ccGasolineRWDManualTwin-turboSedan2016-2019
VS

Cadillac CTS II

V 6.2 V8

564 hp6162 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticSuperchargedSedan2008-2014

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.0 s
  • Most powerful
    564 hp
    421 kW
  • Highest torque
    747 Nm
    551 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    292 hp/t
    218 kW/t
    3.4 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    385 L
  • Best overall score
    82/100
  • Best performance score
    87/100
  • Best practicality score
    71/100

Cadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6

  • Fastest top speed
    298 km/h
    185 mph
  • Lightest
    1,729 kg
    3,812 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    12.4 L/100 km
    19.0 mpg US
    22.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    13.8 L/100 km
    17.0 mpg US
    20.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    10.2 L/100 km
    23.1 mpg US
    27.7 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    488 km
    303 mi
  • Best economy score
    74/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelCadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
Power
471hp351kW
564hp421kW
Torque
603Nm445lb-ft
747Nm551lb-ft
Curb weight
1,729kg3,812lb
1,930kg4,255lb
Top speed
298 km/h
185 mph
282 km/h
175 mph
To 99% top speed
44.7s99% target: 295 km/h / 183 mph
Calculated
41.4s99% target: 279 km/h / 173 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.2s
4.0s
0-200 km/h
11.2s
Calculated
11.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.0s
Calculated
3.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK
14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK
16.8L/100 km14mpg US16.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK
12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
11.9s
Calculated
11.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
272hp/t203kW/t124hp/1000 lb
Calculated
292hp/t218kW/t133hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
349Nm/t233lb-ft/ton
Calculated
387Nm/t259lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
488km303mi
Calculated
463km287mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,564cc217cu in
6,162cc376cu in
Length
4,673mm184in
4,859mm191in
Width
1,811mm71in
1,842mm73in
Height
1,415mm56in
1,473mm58in
Wheelbase
2,775mm109in
2,880mm113in
Front track
1,538mm61in
1,575mm62in
Rear track
1,536mm60in
1,577mm62in
Trunk volume
295L
385L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
61L
68L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Cadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8PowerTorque
  • Cadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6: Power / Torque
  • Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V65,850 rpm3,500 rpm6,500 rpm
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V86,100 rpm3,800 rpm6,350 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricCadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.0 s
3.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.2 s
4.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
11.2 s
11.2 s
Top speed
298 km/h
185 mph
282 km/h
175 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.2 s
2.1 s
330 ft
101 m
5.5 s
5.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.0 s
7.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.1 s
10.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
11.9 s
11.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
207 km/h
129 mph
205 km/h
127 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
471 hp
351 kW
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
564 hp
421 kW

Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 has 93 hp more than Cadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6.

The biggest power difference is between Cadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6 and Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8: 93 hp (69 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
603 Nm
445 lb-ft
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
747 Nm
551 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
1,729 kg
3,812 lb
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
1,930 kg
4,255 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
298 km/h
185 mph
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
282 km/h
175 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V64.2 s
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V84.0 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 and Cadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
14.7 L/100 km
16.0 mpg US
19.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Cadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6 and Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8: 2.3 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
272 hp/t
203 kW/t
3.7 kg/hp
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
292 hp/t
218 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
488 km
303 mi
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
463 km
287 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
471 hp
351 kW
4.2 s
298 km/h
185 mph
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
564 hp
421 kW
4.0 s
282 km/h
175 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
Power
471 hp
351 kW
0-100 km/h4.2 s
Top speed
298 km/h
185 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
295 L
10.4 cu ft
Length
4,673 mm
184.0 in
Height
1,415 mm
55.7 in
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
Power
564 hp
421 kW
0-100 km/h4.0 s
Top speed
282 km/h
175 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
385 L
13.6 cu ft
Length
4,859 mm
191.3 in
Height
1,473 mm
58.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
Power
471 hp
351 kW
0-100 km/h4.2 s
Top speed
298 km/h
185 mph
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
Power
564 hp
421 kW
0-100 km/h4.0 s
Top speed
282 km/h
175 mph
14.7 L/100 km
16.0 mpg US
19.2 mpg UK

Cadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
4.2 s
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
14.7 L/100 km
16.0 mpg US
19.2 mpg UK
4.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
272 hp/t
203 kW/t
3.7 kg/hp
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
292 hp/t
218 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp
14.7 L/100 km
16.0 mpg US
19.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleCadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
Power
471 hp
351 kW
564 hp
421 kW
Torque
603 Nm
445 lb-ft
747 Nm
551 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.2 s
4.0 s
Top speed
298 km/h
185 mph
282 km/h
175 mph
Lightness
1,729 kg
3,812 lb
1,930 kg
4,255 lb
Fuel consumption
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
14.7 L/100 km
16.0 mpg US
19.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
295 L
10.4 cu ft
Length
4,673 mm
184.0 in
Height
1,415 mm
55.7 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
385 L
13.6 cu ft
Length
4,859 mm
191.3 in
Height
1,473 mm
58.0 in
Range score
488 km
303 mi
463 km
287 mi
Trunk score
295 L
10.4 cu ft
385 L
13.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
272 hp/t
203 kW/t
3.7 kg/hp
292 hp/t
218 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleCadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8
Consumption12.4 L/100 km19 mpg US22.8 mpg UK14.7 L/100 km16 mpg US19.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km21.70 LC100 km25.72 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi34.92 LC100 mi41.40 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,860 L491 US gal409 UK gal2,205 L582 US gal485 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,255 LC/year3,859 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Cadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6

  • Is 201 kg lighter
  • Has 16 km/h (10 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 2.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 25 km (16 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8

  • Has 93 hp more
  • Has 144 Nm more
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 90 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Cadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6
Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

V 3.6 V6
V 3.6 V6
VS
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6vsCadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6
V 6.2 V8
V 6.2 V8
VS
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8vsCadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8
V 3.6 V6
CS 3.0
VS
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6vsBMWM3 (F80)CS 3.0
V 6.2 V8
V 6.0 i V8
VS
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8vsCadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8
V 3.6 V6
F 5.0 V8
VS
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6vsLexusGS IVFacelift 2015F 5.0 V8
V 6.2 V8
AMG S 63 V8
VS
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8vsMercedes-BenzS-class (W221)Facelift 2009AMG S 63 V8
V 6.2 V8
R 5.0 V8 Supercharged
VS
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8vsJaguarXJ (X351)R 5.0 V8 Supercharged
V 3.6 V6
AMG C 63 V8
VS
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 V8
V 6.2 V8
AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO
VS
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO
V 3.6 V6
S 3.0 V6
VS
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6vsMaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 2017S 3.0 V6
V 6.2 V8
R-S 5.0 V8
VS
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8vsJaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
V 3.6 V6
Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6
VS
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6vsAlfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6
Cadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6 vs Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster