Cadillac CTS II
Car comparison
Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8vsMercedes-Benz S-class (W221) · Facelift 2009 AMG S 63 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz S-class (W221) · Facelift 2009
AMG S 63 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz S-class (W221) Facelift 2009 AMG S 63 V8
- Highest torque800 Nm590 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption14.4 L/100 km16.3 mpg US19.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range857 km533 mi
- Largest trunk560 L
- Best overall score83/100
- Best economy score79/100
- Best practicality score78/100
Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.0 s
- Fastest top speed282 km/h175 mph
- Most powerful564 hp421 kW
- Lightest1,930 kg4,255 lb
- Best power-to-weight292 hp/t218 kW/t3.4 kg/hp
- Best performance score87/100
Specification comparison
| Model | CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 | Mercedes-BenzS-class (W221)Facelift 2009AMG S 63 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 564hp421kW | 544hp406kW |
| Torque | 747Nm551lb-ft | 800Nm590lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,930kg4,255lb | 2,045kg4,508lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,670kg5,886lb |
| Top speed | 282 km/h 175 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 41.4s99% target: 279 km/h / 173 mph Calculated | 40.8s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.0s | 4.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.2s Calculated | 12.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.8s Calculated | 4.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.8L/100 km14mpg US16.8mpg UK | 14.4L/100 km16.3mpg US19.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.7s Calculated | 12.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 292hp/t218kW/t133hp/1000 lb Calculated | 266hp/t198kW/t121hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 387Nm/t259lb-ft/ton Calculated | 391Nm/t262lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 463km287mi Calculated | 857km533mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 6,162cc376cu in | 5,461cc333cu in |
| Length | 4,859mm191in | 5,096mm201in |
| Width | 1,842mm73in | 1,871mm74in |
| Height | 1,473mm58in | 1,479mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,880mm113in | 3,035mm119in |
| Front track | 1,575mm62in | 1,600mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,577mm62in | 1,606mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 385L | 560L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 68L | 90L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz S-class (W221) Facelift 2009 AMG S 63 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 | 6,100 rpm | 3,800 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W221)Facelift 2009AMG S 63 V8 | 5,250-5,750 rpm | 2,000-4,500 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 | Mercedes-BenzS-class (W221)Facelift 2009AMG S 63 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.8 s | 4.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.0 s | 4.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.2 s | 12.9 s |
| Top speed | 282 km/h 175 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.3 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.8 s | 8.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.0 s | 10.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.7 s | 12.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 205 km/h 127 mph | 196 km/h 122 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 | 564 hp 421 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W221)Facelift 2009AMG S 63 V8 | 544 hp 406 kW |
Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 has 20 hp more than Mercedes-Benz S-class (W221) Facelift 2009 AMG S 63 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz S-class (W221) Facelift 2009 AMG S 63 V8 and Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 | 747 Nm 551 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W221)Facelift 2009AMG S 63 V8 | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 | 1,930 kg 4,255 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W221)Facelift 2009AMG S 63 V8 | 2,045 kg 4,508 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 | 282 km/h 175 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W221)Facelift 2009AMG S 63 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 | 4.0 s |
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W221)Facelift 2009AMG S 63 V8 | 4.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 and Mercedes-Benz S-class (W221) Facelift 2009 AMG S 63 V8: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W221)Facelift 2009AMG S 63 V8 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz S-class (W221) Facelift 2009 AMG S 63 V8 and Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8: 4.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 | 292 hp/t 218 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W221)Facelift 2009AMG S 63 V8 | 266 hp/t 198 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 | 463 km 287 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W221)Facelift 2009AMG S 63 V8 | 857 km 533 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 | 564 hp 421 kW | 4.0 s | 282 km/h 175 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W221)Facelift 2009AMG S 63 V8 | 544 hp 406 kW | 4.5 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W221)Facelift 2009AMG S 63 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 |
| 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W221)Facelift 2009AMG S 63 V8 |
| 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz S-class (W221) Facelift 2009 AMG S 63 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK | 4.0 s |
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W221)Facelift 2009AMG S 63 V8 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | 4.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 | 292 hp/t 218 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W221)Facelift 2009AMG S 63 V8 | 266 hp/t 198 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 | Mercedes-BenzS-class (W221)Facelift 2009AMG S 63 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 564 hp 421 kW | 544 hp 406 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 747 Nm 551 lb-ft | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.0 s | 4.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 282 km/h 175 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,930 kg 4,255 lb | 2,045 kg 4,508 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 463 km 287 mi | 857 km 533 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 385 L 13.6 cu ft | 560 L 19.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 292 hp/t 218 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 266 hp/t 198 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 | Mercedes-Benz S-class (W221) Facelift 2009 AMG S 63 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.7 L/100 km16 mpg US19.2 mpg UK | 10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 25.72 LC100 km | 18.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 41.40 LC100 mi | 29.57 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,205 L582 US gal485 UK gal | 1,575 L416 US gal346 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,859 LC/year | 2,756 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8
- Has 20 hp more
- Is 115 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 17 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
- Has 26 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz S-class (W221) Facelift 2009 AMG S 63 V8
- Has 53 Nm more
- Uses 4.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 395 km (245 mi) more estimated range
- Has 175 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























