Jaguar XF (X250) · Facelift 2011
Car comparison
Jaguar XF (X250) · Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8vsCadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCadillac CTS II
V 6.2 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XF (X250) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8
- Fastest top speed315 km/h196 mph Unrestricted300 km/h186 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,875 kg4,134 lb
- Best power-to-weight293 hp/t219 kW/t3.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.6 L/100 km20.3 mpg US24.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range604 km376 mi
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best overall score84/100
- Best performance score88/100
- Best economy score76/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.0 s
- Most powerful564 hp421 kW
- Highest torque747 Nm551 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption16.8 L/100 km14.0 mpg US16.8 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 550hp410kW | 564hp421kW |
| Torque | 680Nm502lb-ft | 747Nm551lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,875kg4,134lb | 1,930kg4,255lb |
| Gross weight | 2,400kg5,291lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph Calculated | 282 km/h 175 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 49.9s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph Calculated | 41.4s99% target: 279 km/h / 173 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.6s | 4.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.6s Calculated | 11.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.4s Calculated | 3.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK | 14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.9L/100 km13.9mpg US16.7mpg UK | 16.8L/100 km14mpg US16.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.2s Calculated | 11.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 293hp/t219kW/t133hp/1000 lb Calculated | 292hp/t218kW/t133hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 363Nm/t243lb-ft/ton Calculated | 387Nm/t259lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 604km376mi Calculated | 463km287mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,000cc305cu in | 6,162cc376cu in |
| Length | 4,981mm196in | 4,859mm191in |
| Width | 1,939mm76in | 1,842mm73in |
| Height | 1,468mm58in | 1,473mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,909mm115in | 2,880mm113in |
| Front track | 1,549mm61in | 1,575mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,563mm62in | 1,577mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 540L | 385L |
| Max trunk volume | 963L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 68L |
| CO2 emissions | 270g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XF (X250) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
- Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | 6,500 rpm | 2,500-5,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 | 6,100 rpm | 3,800 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.4 s | 3.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.6 s | 4.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.6 s | 11.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph Likely limited | 282 km/h 175 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 5.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.3 s | 7.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.4 s | 10.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.2 s | 11.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 206 km/h 128 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | 550 hp 410 kW |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 | 564 hp 421 kW |
Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 has 14 hp more than Jaguar XF (X250) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XF (X250) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8 and Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 | 747 Nm 551 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | 1,875 kg 4,134 lb |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 | 1,930 kg 4,255 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 | 282 km/h 175 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | 4.6 s |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 | 4.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 and Jaguar XF (X250) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XF (X250) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8 and Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8: 3.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | 293 hp/t 219 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 | 292 hp/t 218 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | 604 km 376 mi |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 | 463 km 287 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | 550 hp 410 kW | 4.6 s | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 | 564 hp 421 kW | 4.0 s | 282 km/h 175 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 |
| 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 |
| 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XF (X250) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK | 4.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | 293 hp/t 219 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 | 292 hp/t 218 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 550 hp 410 kW | 564 hp 421 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft | 747 Nm 551 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.6 s | 4.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph | 282 km/h 175 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,875 kg 4,134 lb | 1,930 kg 4,255 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 604 km 376 mi | 463 km 287 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 270 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | 385 L 13.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 293 hp/t 219 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 292 hp/t 218 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XF (X250) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8 | Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.6 L/100 km20.3 mpg US24.4 mpg UK | 14.7 L/100 km16 mpg US19.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.30 LC100 km | 25.72 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.67 LC100 mi | 41.40 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,740 L460 US gal383 UK gal | 2,205 L582 US gal485 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,045 LC/year | 3,859 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XF (X250) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8
- Is 55 kg lighter
- Has 33 km/h (21 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 3.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 142 km (88 mi) more estimated range
- Has 155 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8
- Has 14 hp more
- Has 67 Nm more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























