Jaguar XJ (X350)
Car comparison
Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V L SupervsCadillac CTS I V 6.0 i V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCadillac CTS I
V 6.0 i V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V L Super
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Highest torque541 Nm399 lb-ft
- Lightest1,690 kg3,726 lb
- Best power-to-weight237 hp/t176 kW/t4.2 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption9.0 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK
- Largest trunk470 L
- Best overall score74/100
- Best economy score0/100
- Best practicality score75/100
Cadillac CTS I V 6.0 i V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.6 s
- Most powerful405 hp302 kW
- Lowest city consumption14.7 L/100 km16.0 mpg US19.2 mpg UK
- Best performance score75/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V L Super | CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 400hp298kW | 405hp302kW |
| Torque | 541Nm399lb-ft | 536Nm395lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,690kg3,726lb | 1,780kg3,924lb |
| Gross weight | 2,275kg5,016lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 262 km/h 163 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 52.1s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 46.2s99% target: 259 km/h / 161 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.3s | 4.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.8s Calculated | 14.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.1s Calculated | 4.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption city | 18.6L/100 km12.6mpg US15.2mpg UK | 14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.2s Calculated | 12.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 237hp/t176kW/t107hp/1000 lb Calculated | 228hp/t170kW/t103hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 320Nm/t214lb-ft/ton Calculated | 301Nm/t201lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,196cc256cu in | 5,967cc364cu in |
| Length | 5,215mm205in | 4,864mm191in |
| Width | 1,860mm73in | 1,793mm71in |
| Height | 1,448mm57in | 1,455mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 3,159mm124in | 2,880mm113in |
| Front track | 1,556mm61in | 1,552mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,546mm61in | 1,559mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 470L | - |
| Max trunk volume | - | 362L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 66L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V L Super: Power / Torque
- Cadillac CTS I V 6.0 i V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V L Super | 6,100 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
| CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 | 6,000 rpm | 6,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V L Super | CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.1 s | 4.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.3 s | 4.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.8 s | 14.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 262 km/h 163 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.8 s | 8.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.2 s | 10.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.2 s | 12.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 183 km/h 114 mph | 189 km/h 118 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V L Super | 400 hp 298 kW |
| CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 | 405 hp 302 kW |
Cadillac CTS I V 6.0 i V8 has 5 hp more than Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V L Super.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V L Super and Cadillac CTS I V 6.0 i V8: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V L Super | 541 Nm 399 lb-ft |
| CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 | 536 Nm 395 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V L Super | 1,690 kg 3,726 lb |
| CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 | 1,780 kg 3,924 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V L Super | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 | 262 km/h 163 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V L Super | 5.3 s |
| CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 | 4.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cadillac CTS I V 6.0 i V8 and Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V L Super: 0.7 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V L Super | 237 hp/t 176 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
| CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 | 228 hp/t 170 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V L Super | 400 hp 298 kW | 5.3 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 | 405 hp 302 kW | 4.6 s | 262 km/h 163 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V L Super |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V L Super | CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 400 hp 298 kW | 405 hp 302 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 541 Nm 399 lb-ft | 536 Nm 395 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.3 s | 4.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 262 km/h 163 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,690 kg 3,726 lb | 1,780 kg 3,924 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | 362 L 12.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 237 hp/t 176 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 228 hp/t 170 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V L Super
- Has 5 Nm more
- Is 90 kg lighter
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 108 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Cadillac CTS I V 6.0 i V8
- Has 5 hp more
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























