Car comparison

Maybach 62 S (V240) · Facelift 2010 6.0 V12vsCadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Maybach 62 S (V240) · Facelift 2010

6.0 V12

630 hp5980 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2010-2013
VS

Cadillac CTS II

V 6.2 V8

564 hp6162 ccGasolineRWDManualSuperchargedSedan2008-2014

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Maybach 62 S (V240) Facelift 2010 6.0 V12

  • Fastest top speed
    290 km/h
    180 mph Unrestricted
    275 km/h
    171 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    630 hp
    470 kW
  • Highest torque
    1,000 Nm
    738 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    15.8 L/100 km
    14.9 mpg US
    17.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    11.8 L/100 km
    19.9 mpg US
    23.9 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    696 km
    433 mi
  • Largest trunk
    605 L
  • Best economy score
    65/100
  • Best practicality score
    77/100

Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    3.9 s
  • Lightest
    1,915 kg
    4,222 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    295 hp/t
    220 kW/t
    3.4 kg/hp
  • Lowest city consumption
    19.6 L/100 km
    12.0 mpg US
    14.4 mpg UK
  • Best overall score
    81/100
  • Best performance score
    86/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMaybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
Power
630hp470kW
564hp421kW
Torque
1,000Nm738lb-ft
747Nm551lb-ft
Curb weight
2,780kg6,129lb
1,915kg4,222lb
Gross weight
3,380kg7,452lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
275 km/h171 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
62.2s99% target: 287 km/h / 178 mph
Calculated
37.2s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.1s
3.9s
0-200 km/h
14.8s
Calculated
11.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.9s
Calculated
3.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
15.8L/100 km14.9mpg US17.9mpg UK
16.8L/100 km14mpg US16.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
24.6L/100 km9.6mpg US11.5mpg UK
19.6L/100 km12mpg US14.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK
13.1L/100 km18mpg US21.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.0s
Calculated
11.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
227hp/t169kW/t103hp/1000 lb
Calculated
295hp/t220kW/t134hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
360Nm/t241lb-ft/ton
Calculated
390Nm/t261lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
696km433mi
Calculated
405km252mi
Calculated
Displacement
5,980cc365cu in
6,162cc376cu in
Length
6,171mm243in
4,859mm191in
Width
1,980mm78in
1,842mm73in
Height
1,573mm62in
1,473mm58in
Wheelbase
3,827mm151in
2,880mm113in
Front track
1,675mm66in
1,575mm62in
Rear track
1,695mm67in
1,577mm62in
Trunk volume
605L
385L
Doors
4
4
Seats
4
5
Fuel tank
110L
68L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Maybach 62 S (V240) Facelift 2010 6.0 V12Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8PowerTorque
  • Maybach 62 S (V240) Facelift 2010 6.0 V12: Power / Torque
  • Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V124,800-5,100 rpm2,000-4,000 rpm5,350 rpm
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V86,100 rpm3,800 rpm6,350 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMaybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.9 s
3.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.1 s
3.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
14.8 s
11.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
275 km/h171 mph
Limited
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.1 s
330 ft
101 m
5.9 s
5.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.7 s
7.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.0 s
9.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.0 s
11.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
187 km/h
116 mph
202 km/h
125 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12
630 hp
470 kW
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
564 hp
421 kW

Maybach 62 S (V240) Facelift 2010 6.0 V12 has 66 hp more than Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 and Maybach 62 S (V240) Facelift 2010 6.0 V12: 66 hp (49 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12
1,000 Nm
738 lb-ft
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
747 Nm
551 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12
2,780 kg
6,129 lb
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
1,915 kg
4,222 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
275 km/h171 mph
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V125.1 s
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V83.9 s

Although Maybach 62 S (V240) Facelift 2010 6.0 V12 has more power, Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 and Maybach 62 S (V240) Facelift 2010 6.0 V12: 1.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12
15.8 L/100 km
14.9 mpg US
17.9 mpg UK
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
16.8 L/100 km
14.0 mpg US
16.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Maybach 62 S (V240) Facelift 2010 6.0 V12 and Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8: 1.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12
227 hp/t
169 kW/t
4.4 kg/hp
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
295 hp/t
220 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12
696 km
433 mi
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
405 km
252 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12
630 hp
470 kW
5.1 s
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
275 km/h171 mph
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
564 hp
421 kW
3.9 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12
Power
630 hp
470 kW
0-100 km/h5.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
275 km/h171 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
605 L
21.4 cu ft
Length
6,171 mm
243.0 in
Height
1,573 mm
61.9 in
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
Power
564 hp
421 kW
0-100 km/h3.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
385 L
13.6 cu ft
Length
4,859 mm
191.3 in
Height
1,473 mm
58.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12
Power
630 hp
470 kW
0-100 km/h5.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
275 km/h171 mph
15.8 L/100 km
14.9 mpg US
17.9 mpg UK
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
Power
564 hp
421 kW
0-100 km/h3.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
16.8 L/100 km
14.0 mpg US
16.8 mpg UK

Maybach 62 S (V240) Facelift 2010 6.0 V12 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12
15.8 L/100 km
14.9 mpg US
17.9 mpg UK
5.1 s
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
16.8 L/100 km
14.0 mpg US
16.8 mpg UK
3.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12
227 hp/t
169 kW/t
4.4 kg/hp
15.8 L/100 km
14.9 mpg US
17.9 mpg UK
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
295 hp/t
220 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp
16.8 L/100 km
14.0 mpg US
16.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMaybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
Power
630 hp
470 kW
564 hp
421 kW
Torque
1,000 Nm
738 lb-ft
747 Nm
551 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.1 s
3.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
275 km/h171 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
2,780 kg
6,129 lb
1,915 kg
4,222 lb
Fuel consumption
15.8 L/100 km
14.9 mpg US
17.9 mpg UK
16.8 L/100 km
14.0 mpg US
16.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
605 L
21.4 cu ft
Length
6,171 mm
243.0 in
Height
1,573 mm
61.9 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
385 L
13.6 cu ft
Length
4,859 mm
191.3 in
Height
1,473 mm
58.0 in
Range score
696 km
433 mi
405 km
252 mi
Trunk score
605 L
21.4 cu ft
385 L
13.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
227 hp/t
169 kW/t
4.4 kg/hp
295 hp/t
220 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMaybach 62 S (V240) Facelift 2010 6.0 V12Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8
Consumption15.8 L/100 km14.9 mpg US17.9 mpg UK16.8 L/100 km14 mpg US16.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km27.65 LC100 km29.40 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi44.50 LC100 mi47.31 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used2,370 L626 US gal521 UK gal2,520 L666 US gal554 UK gal
Annual fuel cost4,148 LC/year4,410 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Maybach 62 S (V240) Facelift 2010 6.0 V12

  • Has 66 hp more
  • Has 253 Nm more
  • Has 25 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 291 km (181 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 220 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest

Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8

  • Is 865 kg lighter
  • Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 68 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Maybach 62 S (V240) 6.0 V12
Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

6.0 V12
Speed 6.0i W12
VS
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12vsBentleyContinental Flying SpurSpeed 6.0i W12
V 6.2 V8
V 6.2 V8
VS
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8vsCadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8
6.0 V12
6.0 W12
VS
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12vsBentleyFlying Spur II6.0 W12
V 6.2 V8
V 5.7 i V8
VS
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8vsCadillacCTS IV 5.7 i V8
6.0 V12
AMG S 63 V8
VS
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12vsMercedes-BenzS-class (W221)Facelift 2009AMG S 63 V8
6.0 V12
V 6.2 V8
VS
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12vsCadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
V 6.2 V8
AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO
VS
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO
6.0 V12
6.3 FSI W12
VS
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12vsAUDIA8L (D4/4H)6.3 FSI W12
V 6.2 V8
AMG E 63 V8
VS
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013AMG E 63 V8
6.0 V12
760i
VS
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12vsBMW7 Series (F01 LCI)Facelift 2012760i
V 6.2 V8
760i
VS
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8vsBMW7 Series (F01)760i
V 6.2 V8
5.0 V8 Supercharged
VS
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8vsJaguarXJ (X351)5.0 V8 Supercharged
Maybach 62 S (V240) · Facelift 2010 6.0 V12 vs Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster