Car comparison

Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8vsMercedes-Benz E-class (W212) AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Cadillac CTS II

V 6.2 V8

564 hp6162 ccGasolineRWDManualSuperchargedSedan2008-2014
VS

Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212)

AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO

525 hp5461 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2011-2013

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO

  • Lightest
    1,765 kg
    3,891 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    297 hp/t
    222 kW/t
    3.4 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    9.8 L/100 km
    24.0 mpg US
    28.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    13.8 L/100 km
    17.0 mpg US
    20.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.5 L/100 km
    31.4 mpg US
    37.7 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    673 km
    418 mi
  • Largest trunk
    532 L
  • Best overall score
    82/100
  • Best economy score
    81/100
  • Best practicality score
    77/100

Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    3.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    265 km/h
    165 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    564 hp
    421 kW
  • Highest torque
    747 Nm
    551 lb-ft
  • Best performance score
    86/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelCadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO
Power
564hp421kW
525hp391kW
Torque
747Nm551lb-ft
700Nm516lb-ft
Curb weight
1,915kg4,222lb
1,765kg3,891lb
Gross weight-
2,390kg5,269lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
37.2s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
38.0s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.9s
4.3s
0-200 km/h
11.5s
Calculated
12.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.7s
Calculated
4.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
16.8L/100 km14mpg US16.8mpg UK
9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
19.6L/100 km12mpg US14.4mpg UK
13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
13.1L/100 km18mpg US21.6mpg UK
7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
11.7s
Calculated
12.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
295hp/t220kW/t134hp/1000 lb
Calculated
297hp/t222kW/t135hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
390Nm/t261lb-ft/ton
Calculated
397Nm/t265lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
405km252mi
Calculated
673km418mi
Calculated
Displacement
6,162cc376cu in
5,461cc333cu in
Length
4,859mm191in
4,868mm192in
Width
1,842mm73in
1,854mm73in
Height
1,473mm58in
1,471mm58in
Wheelbase
2,880mm113in
2,874mm113in
Front track
1,575mm62in
1,598mm63in
Rear track
1,577mm62in
1,614mm64in
Trunk volume
385L
532L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
68L
66L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) AMG E 63 V8 BITURBOPowerTorque
  • Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8: Power / Torque
  • Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V86,100 rpm3,800 rpm6,350 rpm
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO5,250-5,750 rpm1,750-5,000 rpm6,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricCadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.7 s
4.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.9 s
4.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
11.5 s
12.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
5.3 s
5.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.7 s
8.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
9.9 s
10.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
11.7 s
12.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
202 km/h
125 mph
199 km/h
124 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
564 hp
421 kW
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO
525 hp
391 kW

Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 has 39 hp more than Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO.

The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO and Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8: 39 hp (29 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
747 Nm
551 lb-ft
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO
700 Nm
516 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
1,915 kg
4,222 lb
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO
1,765 kg
3,891 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V83.9 s
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO4.3 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
16.8 L/100 km
14.0 mpg US
16.8 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO and Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8: 7.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
295 hp/t
220 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO
297 hp/t
222 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
405 km
252 mi
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO
673 km
418 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
564 hp
421 kW
3.9 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO
525 hp
391 kW
4.3 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
Power
564 hp
421 kW
0-100 km/h3.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
385 L
13.6 cu ft
Length
4,859 mm
191.3 in
Height
1,473 mm
58.0 in
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO
Power
525 hp
391 kW
0-100 km/h4.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
532 L
18.8 cu ft
Length
4,868 mm
191.7 in
Height
1,471 mm
57.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
Power
564 hp
421 kW
0-100 km/h3.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
16.8 L/100 km
14.0 mpg US
16.8 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO
Power
525 hp
391 kW
0-100 km/h4.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK

Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
16.8 L/100 km
14.0 mpg US
16.8 mpg UK
3.9 s
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK
4.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
295 hp/t
220 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp
16.8 L/100 km
14.0 mpg US
16.8 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO
297 hp/t
222 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleCadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO
Power
564 hp
421 kW
525 hp
391 kW
Torque
747 Nm
551 lb-ft
700 Nm
516 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.9 s
4.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,915 kg
4,222 lb
1,765 kg
3,891 lb
Fuel consumption
16.8 L/100 km
14.0 mpg US
16.8 mpg UK
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
385 L
13.6 cu ft
Length
4,859 mm
191.3 in
Height
1,473 mm
58.0 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
532 L
18.8 cu ft
Length
4,868 mm
191.7 in
Height
1,471 mm
57.9 in
Range score
405 km
252 mi
673 km
418 mi
Trunk score
385 L
13.6 cu ft
532 L
18.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
295 hp/t
220 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp
297 hp/t
222 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleCadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO
Consumption16.8 L/100 km14 mpg US16.8 mpg UK9.8 L/100 km24 mpg US28.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km29.40 LC100 km17.15 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi47.31 LC100 mi27.60 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used2,520 L666 US gal554 UK gal1,470 L388 US gal323 UK gal
Annual fuel cost4,410 LC/year2,573 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8

  • Has 39 hp more
  • Has 47 Nm more
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO

  • Is 150 kg lighter
  • Uses 7.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 269 km (167 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 147 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

V 6.2 V8
V 6.2 V8
VS
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8vsCadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8
AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO
AMG E 63 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V8 BITURBOvsMercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013AMG E 63 V8
V 6.2 V8
V 5.7 i V8
VS
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8vsCadillacCTS IV 5.7 i V8
AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO
AMG E 63 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V8 BITURBOvsMercedes-BenzE-class (W211)Facelift 2006AMG E 63 V8
V 6.2 V8
AMG S 63 V8
VS
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8vsMercedes-BenzS-class (W221)Facelift 2009AMG S 63 V8
AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO
AMG E 63 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V8 BITURBOvsMercedes-BenzE-class (W213)AMG E 63 V8
V 6.2 V8
AMG E 63 V8
VS
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V8
AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO
AMG E 55 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V8 BITURBOvsMercedes-BenzE-class (W211)AMG E 55 V8
AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO
AMG E 53
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V8 BITURBOvsMercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020AMG E 53
V 6.2 V8
760i
VS
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8vsBMW7 Series (F01)760i
AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO
E 500 BlueEFFICIENCY V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V8 BITURBOvsMercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C207)E 500 BlueEFFICIENCY V8
V 6.2 V8
5.0 V8 Supercharged
VS
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8vsJaguarXJ (X351)5.0 V8 Supercharged
Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 vs Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO - car comparison - FastVsFaster