Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) · Facelift 2013 AMG E 63 V8vsCadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) · Facelift 2013

AMG E 63 V8

557 hp5461 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2013-2016
VS

Cadillac CTS II

V 6.2 V8

564 hp6162 ccGasolineRWDManualSuperchargedSedan2008-2014

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 AMG E 63 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    3.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    265 km/h
    165 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    1,845 kg
    4,068 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    302 hp/t
    225 kW/t
    3.3 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    10.3 L/100 km
    22.8 mpg US
    27.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    14.4 L/100 km
    16.3 mpg US
    19.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.9 L/100 km
    29.8 mpg US
    35.8 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    641 km
    398 mi
  • Largest trunk
    540 L
  • Best overall score
    84/100
  • Best performance score
    87/100
  • Best economy score
    79/100
  • Best practicality score
    77/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013AMG E 63 V8CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
Power
557hp415kW
564hp421kW
Torque
720Nm531lb-ft
747Nm551lb-ft
Curb weight
1,845kg4,068lb
1,915kg4,222lb
Gross weight
2,425kg5,346lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
31.9s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
37.2s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.7s
3.9s
0-200 km/h
10.4s
Calculated
11.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.6s
Calculated
3.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK
16.8L/100 km14mpg US16.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
14.4L/100 km16.3mpg US19.6mpg UK
19.6L/100 km12mpg US14.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK
13.1L/100 km18mpg US21.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
11.4s
Calculated
11.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
302hp/t225kW/t137hp/1000 lb
Calculated
295hp/t220kW/t134hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
390Nm/t261lb-ft/ton
Calculated
390Nm/t261lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
641km398mi
Calculated
405km252mi
Calculated
Displacement
5,461cc333cu in
6,162cc376cu in
Length
4,892mm193in
4,859mm191in
Width
1,873mm74in
1,842mm73in
Height
1,466mm58in
1,473mm58in
Wheelbase
2,874mm113in
2,880mm113in
Front track-
1,575mm62in
Rear track-
1,577mm62in
Trunk volume
540L
385L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
66L
68L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 AMG E 63 V8Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8PowerTorque
  • Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 AMG E 63 V8: Power / Torque
  • Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013AMG E 63 V85,500 rpm1,750-5,250 rpm5,750 rpm
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V86,100 rpm3,800 rpm6,350 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013AMG E 63 V8CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.6 s
3.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.7 s
3.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
10.4 s
11.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.1 s
330 ft
101 m
5.2 s
5.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.6 s
7.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
9.6 s
9.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
11.4 s
11.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
209 km/h
130 mph
202 km/h
125 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013AMG E 63 V8
557 hp
415 kW
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
564 hp
421 kW

Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 has 7 hp more than Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 AMG E 63 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 AMG E 63 V8 and Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8: 7 hp (5 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013AMG E 63 V8
720 Nm
531 lb-ft
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
747 Nm
551 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013AMG E 63 V8
1,845 kg
4,068 lb
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
1,915 kg
4,222 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013AMG E 63 V8
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013AMG E 63 V83.7 s
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V83.9 s

Although Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 has more power, Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 AMG E 63 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 AMG E 63 V8 and Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013AMG E 63 V8
10.3 L/100 km
22.8 mpg US
27.4 mpg UK
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
16.8 L/100 km
14.0 mpg US
16.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 AMG E 63 V8 and Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8: 6.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013AMG E 63 V8
302 hp/t
225 kW/t
3.3 kg/hp
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
295 hp/t
220 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013AMG E 63 V8
641 km
398 mi
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
405 km
252 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013AMG E 63 V8
557 hp
415 kW
3.7 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
564 hp
421 kW
3.9 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013AMG E 63 V8
Power
557 hp
415 kW
0-100 km/h3.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,892 mm
192.6 in
Height
1,466 mm
57.7 in
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
Power
564 hp
421 kW
0-100 km/h3.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
385 L
13.6 cu ft
Length
4,859 mm
191.3 in
Height
1,473 mm
58.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013AMG E 63 V8
Power
557 hp
415 kW
0-100 km/h3.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
10.3 L/100 km
22.8 mpg US
27.4 mpg UK
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
Power
564 hp
421 kW
0-100 km/h3.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
16.8 L/100 km
14.0 mpg US
16.8 mpg UK

Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 AMG E 63 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013AMG E 63 V8
10.3 L/100 km
22.8 mpg US
27.4 mpg UK
3.7 s
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
16.8 L/100 km
14.0 mpg US
16.8 mpg UK
3.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013AMG E 63 V8
302 hp/t
225 kW/t
3.3 kg/hp
10.3 L/100 km
22.8 mpg US
27.4 mpg UK
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
295 hp/t
220 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp
16.8 L/100 km
14.0 mpg US
16.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013AMG E 63 V8CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
Power
557 hp
415 kW
564 hp
421 kW
Torque
720 Nm
531 lb-ft
747 Nm
551 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.7 s
3.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,845 kg
4,068 lb
1,915 kg
4,222 lb
Fuel consumption
10.3 L/100 km
22.8 mpg US
27.4 mpg UK
16.8 L/100 km
14.0 mpg US
16.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,892 mm
192.6 in
Height
1,466 mm
57.7 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
385 L
13.6 cu ft
Length
4,859 mm
191.3 in
Height
1,473 mm
58.0 in
Range score
641 km
398 mi
405 km
252 mi
Trunk score
540 L
19.1 cu ft
385 L
13.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
302 hp/t
225 kW/t
3.3 kg/hp
295 hp/t
220 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 AMG E 63 V8Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8
Consumption10.3 L/100 km22.8 mpg US27.4 mpg UK16.8 L/100 km14 mpg US16.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km18.03 LC100 km29.40 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi29.01 LC100 mi47.31 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,545 L408 US gal340 UK gal2,520 L666 US gal554 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,704 LC/year4,410 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 AMG E 63 V8

  • Is 70 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 6.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 236 km (147 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 155 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power

Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8

  • Has 7 hp more
  • Has 27 Nm more

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) AMG E 63 V8
Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

AMG E 63 V8
AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013AMG E 63 V8vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO
V 6.2 V8
V 6.2 V8
VS
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8vsCadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8
AMG E 63 V8
AMG E 63 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013AMG E 63 V8vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W213)AMG E 63 V8
V 6.2 V8
V 5.7 i V8
VS
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8vsCadillacCTS IV 5.7 i V8
AMG E 63 V8
AMG E 63 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013AMG E 63 V8vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W211)Facelift 2006AMG E 63 V8
V 6.2 V8
AMG S 63 V8
VS
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8vsMercedes-BenzS-class (W221)Facelift 2009AMG S 63 V8
AMG E 63 V8
AMG E 63 S
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013AMG E 63 V8vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020AMG E 63 S
AMG E 63 V8
AMG E 55 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013AMG E 63 V8vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W211)AMG E 55 V8
V 6.2 V8
760i
VS
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8vsBMW7 Series (F01)760i
AMG E 63 V8
E 450
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013AMG E 63 V8vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 450
V 6.2 V8
5.0 V8 Supercharged
VS
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8vsJaguarXJ (X351)5.0 V8 Supercharged
AMG E 63 V8
E 500 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013AMG E 63 V8vsMercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C207)Facelift 2013E 500 V8
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) · Facelift 2013 AMG E 63 V8 vs Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster