Car comparison

Bentley Continental Flying Spur Speed 6.0i W12vsCadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Bentley Continental Flying Spur

Speed 6.0i W12

610 hp5998 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2008-2013
VS

Cadillac CTS II

V 6.2 V8

564 hp6162 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticSuperchargedSedan2008-2014

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.0 s
  • Lightest
    1,930 kg
    4,255 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    292 hp/t
    218 kW/t
    3.4 kg/hp
  • Lowest city consumption
    16.8 L/100 km
    14.0 mpg US
    16.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    12.4 L/100 km
    19.0 mpg US
    22.8 mpg UK
  • Best performance score
    87/100
  • Best economy score
    67/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBentleyContinental Flying SpurSpeed 6.0i W12CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
Power
610hp455kW
564hp421kW
Torque
750Nm553lb-ft
747Nm551lb-ft
Curb weight
2,475kg5,456lb
1,930kg4,255lb
Gross weight
2,980kg6,570lb
-
Top speed
322 km/h
200 mph
282 km/h
175 mph
To 99% top speed
61.3s99% target: 319 km/h / 198 mph
Calculated
41.4s99% target: 279 km/h / 173 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.8s
4.0s
0-200 km/h
12.7s
Calculated
11.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.6s
Calculated
3.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption-
14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
26.4L/100 km8.9mpg US10.7mpg UK
16.8L/100 km14mpg US16.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
12.7L/100 km18.5mpg US22.2mpg UK
12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.5s
Calculated
11.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
246hp/t184kW/t112hp/1000 lb
Calculated
292hp/t218kW/t133hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
303Nm/t203lb-ft/ton
Calculated
387Nm/t259lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range-
463km287mi
Calculated
Displacement
5,998cc366cu in
6,162cc376cu in
Length
5,307mm209in
4,859mm191in
Width
1,937mm76in
1,842mm73in
Height
1,479mm58in
1,473mm58in
Wheelbase
3,065mm121in
2,880mm113in
Front track
1,623mm64in
1,575mm62in
Rear track
1,607mm63in
1,577mm62in
Trunk volume
475L
385L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
90L
68L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Bentley Continental Flying Spur Speed 6.0i W12Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8PowerTorque
  • Bentley Continental Flying Spur Speed 6.0i W12: Power / Torque
  • Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BentleyContinental Flying SpurSpeed 6.0i W126,000 rpm1,750 rpm6,250 rpm
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V86,100 rpm3,800 rpm6,350 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBentleyContinental Flying SpurSpeed 6.0i W12CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.6 s
3.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.8 s
4.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
12.7 s
11.2 s
Top speed
322 km/h
200 mph
282 km/h
175 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.1 s
330 ft
101 m
5.8 s
5.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.4 s
7.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.7 s
10.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.5 s
11.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
199 km/h
123 mph
205 km/h
127 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyContinental Flying SpurSpeed 6.0i W12
610 hp
455 kW
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
564 hp
421 kW

Bentley Continental Flying Spur Speed 6.0i W12 has 46 hp more than Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 and Bentley Continental Flying Spur Speed 6.0i W12: 46 hp (34 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyContinental Flying SpurSpeed 6.0i W12
750 Nm
553 lb-ft
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
747 Nm
551 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyContinental Flying SpurSpeed 6.0i W12
2,475 kg
5,456 lb
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
1,930 kg
4,255 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyContinental Flying SpurSpeed 6.0i W12
322 km/h
200 mph
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
282 km/h
175 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyContinental Flying SpurSpeed 6.0i W124.8 s
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V84.0 s

Although Bentley Continental Flying Spur Speed 6.0i W12 has more power, Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 and Bentley Continental Flying Spur Speed 6.0i W12: 0.8 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyContinental Flying SpurSpeed 6.0i W12
246 hp/t
184 kW/t
4.1 kg/hp
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
292 hp/t
218 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BentleyContinental Flying SpurSpeed 6.0i W12
610 hp
455 kW
4.8 s
322 km/h
200 mph
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
564 hp
421 kW
4.0 s
282 km/h
175 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BentleyContinental Flying SpurSpeed 6.0i W12
Power
610 hp
455 kW
0-100 km/h4.8 s
Top speed
322 km/h
200 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
475 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
5,307 mm
208.9 in
Height
1,479 mm
58.2 in
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
Power
564 hp
421 kW
0-100 km/h4.0 s
Top speed
282 km/h
175 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
385 L
13.6 cu ft
Length
4,859 mm
191.3 in
Height
1,473 mm
58.0 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBentleyContinental Flying SpurSpeed 6.0i W12CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
Power
610 hp
455 kW
564 hp
421 kW
Torque
750 Nm
553 lb-ft
747 Nm
551 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.8 s
4.0 s
Top speed
322 km/h
200 mph
282 km/h
175 mph
Lightness
2,475 kg
5,456 lb
1,930 kg
4,255 lb
Fuel consumption
-
14.7 L/100 km
16.0 mpg US
19.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
475 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
5,307 mm
208.9 in
Height
1,479 mm
58.2 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
385 L
13.6 cu ft
Length
4,859 mm
191.3 in
Height
1,473 mm
58.0 in
Range score
-
463 km
287 mi
Trunk score
475 L
16.8 cu ft
385 L
13.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
246 hp/t
184 kW/t
4.1 kg/hp
292 hp/t
218 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleCadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8
Consumption14.7 L/100 km16 mpg US19.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km25.72 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi41.40 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used2,205 L582 US gal485 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,859 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8

  • Is 545 kg lighter
  • Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 46 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Bentley Continental Flying Spur Speed 6.0i W12
Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Speed 6.0i W12
Speed 6.0i W12 48V Twin Turbo
VS
BentleyContinental Flying SpurSpeed 6.0i W12vsBentleyContinental GTSpeed 6.0i W12 48V Twin Turbo
V 6.2 V8
V 6.2 V8
VS
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8vsCadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8
Speed 6.0i W12
Speed 6.0 W12
VS
BentleyContinental Flying SpurSpeed 6.0i W12vsBentleyContinental GTC IISpeed 6.0 W12
V 6.2 V8
V 6.0 i V8
VS
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8vsCadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8
Speed 6.0i W12
6.0 W12
VS
BentleyContinental Flying SpurSpeed 6.0i W12vsBentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12
V 6.2 V8
AMG S 63 V8
VS
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8vsMercedes-BenzS-class (W221)Facelift 2009AMG S 63 V8
Speed 6.0i W12
6.0 i W12 48V
VS
BentleyContinental Flying SpurSpeed 6.0i W12vsBentleyContinental GTC6.0 i W12 48V
V 6.2 V8
R 5.0 V8 Supercharged
VS
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8vsJaguarXJ (X351)R 5.0 V8 Supercharged
Speed 6.0i W12
6.0 W12
VS
BentleyContinental Flying SpurSpeed 6.0i W12vsBentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 20156.0 W12
V 6.2 V8
AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO
VS
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO
Speed 6.0i W12
6.0 W12
VS
BentleyContinental Flying SpurSpeed 6.0i W12vsBentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 20156.0 W12
V 6.2 V8
R-S 5.0 V8
VS
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8vsJaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
Bentley Continental Flying Spur Speed 6.0i W12 vs Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster