Bentley Continental GT
Car comparison
Bentley Continental GT Speed 6.0i W12 48V Twin TurbovsBentley Continental Flying Spur Speed 6.0i W12
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBentley Continental Flying Spur
Speed 6.0i W12
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Bentley Continental GT Speed 6.0i W12 48V Twin Turbo
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.5 s
- Fastest top speed326 km/h203 mph
- Most powerful610 hp455 kW
- Highest torque750 Nm553 lb-ft
- Lightest2,350 kg5,181 lb
- Best power-to-weight260 hp/t194 kW/t3.9 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption25.3 L/100 km9.3 mpg US11.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption11.6 L/100 km20.3 mpg US24.4 mpg UK
- Best performance score87/100
- Best economy score62/100
Bentley Continental Flying Spur Speed 6.0i W12
- Largest trunk475 L
- Best overall score82/100
- Best practicality score75/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyContinental GTSpeed 6.0i W12 48V Twin Turbo | BentleyContinental Flying SpurSpeed 6.0i W12 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 610hp455kW | 610hp455kW |
| Torque | 750Nm553lb-ft | 750Nm553lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,350kg5,181lb | 2,475kg5,456lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,980kg6,570lb |
| Top speed | 326 km/h 203 mph | 322 km/h 200 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 84.7s99% target: 323 km/h / 201 mph Calculated | 61.3s99% target: 319 km/h / 198 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.5s | 4.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.6s Calculated | 12.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.3s Calculated | 4.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 16.6L/100 km14.2mpg US17.0mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 25.3L/100 km9.3mpg US11.2mpg UK | 26.4L/100 km8.9mpg US10.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK | 12.7L/100 km18.5mpg US22.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.4s Calculated | 12.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 260hp/t194kW/t118hp/1000 lb Calculated | 246hp/t184kW/t112hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 319Nm/t214lb-ft/ton Calculated | 303Nm/t203lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 542km337mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 5,998cc366cu in | 5,998cc366cu in |
| Length | 4,804mm189in | 5,307mm209in |
| Width | 1,916mm75in | 1,937mm76in |
| Height | 1,380mm54in | 1,479mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,745mm108in | 3,065mm121in |
| Front track | 1,623mm64in | 1,623mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,607mm63in | 1,607mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 370L | 475L |
| Doors | 2 | 4 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 90L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bentley Continental GT Speed 6.0i W12 48V Twin Turbo: Power / Torque
- Bentley Continental Flying Spur Speed 6.0i W12: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTSpeed 6.0i W12 48V Twin Turbo | 6,000 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| BentleyContinental Flying SpurSpeed 6.0i W12 | 6,000 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyContinental GTSpeed 6.0i W12 48V Twin Turbo | BentleyContinental Flying SpurSpeed 6.0i W12 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.3 s | 4.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.5 s | 4.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.6 s | 12.7 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 79.7 s | - |
| Top speed | 326 km/h 203 mph | 322 km/h 200 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 5.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.2 s | 8.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.5 s | 10.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.4 s | 12.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 191 km/h 119 mph | 199 km/h 123 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTSpeed 6.0i W12 48V Twin Turbo | 610 hp 455 kW |
| BentleyContinental Flying SpurSpeed 6.0i W12 | 610 hp 455 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTSpeed 6.0i W12 48V Twin Turbo | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft |
| BentleyContinental Flying SpurSpeed 6.0i W12 | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTSpeed 6.0i W12 48V Twin Turbo | 2,350 kg 5,181 lb |
| BentleyContinental Flying SpurSpeed 6.0i W12 | 2,475 kg 5,456 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTSpeed 6.0i W12 48V Twin Turbo | 326 km/h 203 mph |
| BentleyContinental Flying SpurSpeed 6.0i W12 | 322 km/h 200 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTSpeed 6.0i W12 48V Twin Turbo | 4.5 s |
| BentleyContinental Flying SpurSpeed 6.0i W12 | 4.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Bentley Continental GT Speed 6.0i W12 48V Twin Turbo and Bentley Continental Flying Spur Speed 6.0i W12: 0.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTSpeed 6.0i W12 48V Twin Turbo | 260 hp/t 194 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
| BentleyContinental Flying SpurSpeed 6.0i W12 | 246 hp/t 184 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTSpeed 6.0i W12 48V Twin Turbo | 610 hp 455 kW | 4.5 s | 326 km/h 203 mph |
| BentleyContinental Flying SpurSpeed 6.0i W12 | 610 hp 455 kW | 4.8 s | 322 km/h 200 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTSpeed 6.0i W12 48V Twin Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BentleyContinental Flying SpurSpeed 6.0i W12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyContinental GTSpeed 6.0i W12 48V Twin Turbo | BentleyContinental Flying SpurSpeed 6.0i W12 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 610 hp 455 kW | 610 hp 455 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.5 s | 4.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 326 km/h 203 mph | 322 km/h 200 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,350 kg 5,181 lb | 2,475 kg 5,456 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 16.6 L/100 km 14.2 mpg US 17.0 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 542 km 337 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 370 L 13.1 cu ft | 475 L 16.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 260 hp/t 194 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 246 hp/t 184 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Continental GT Speed 6.0i W12 48V Twin Turbo |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 16.6 L/100 km14.2 mpg US17 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 29.05 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 46.75 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,490 L658 US gal548 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 4,358 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Continental GT Speed 6.0i W12 48V Twin Turbo
- Is 125 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Bentley Continental Flying Spur Speed 6.0i W12
- Has 105 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























