Bentley Continental Flying Spur
Car comparison
Bentley Continental Flying Spur Speed 6.0i W12vsBentley Continental GT II 6.0 W12
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBentley Continental GT II
6.0 W12
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Bentley Continental Flying Spur Speed 6.0i W12
- Fastest top speed322 km/h200 mph
- Most powerful610 hp455 kW
- Highest torque750 Nm553 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight246 hp/t184 kW/t4.1 kg/hp
- Best overall score82/100
- Best performance score86/100
- Best practicality score75/100
Bentley Continental GT II 6.0 W12
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.5 s
- Lightest2,320 kg5,115 lb
- Lowest city consumption22.4 L/100 km10.5 mpg US12.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK
- Best economy score68/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyContinental Flying SpurSpeed 6.0i W12 | BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 610hp455kW | 567hp423kW |
| Torque | 750Nm553lb-ft | 700Nm516lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,475kg5,456lb | 2,320kg5,115lb |
| Gross weight | 2,980kg6,570lb | 2,750kg6,063lb |
| Top speed | 322 km/h 200 mph | 316 km/h 196 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 61.3s99% target: 319 km/h / 198 mph Calculated | 84.2s99% target: 313 km/h / 194 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.8s | 4.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.7s Calculated | 14.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.6s Calculated | 4.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 14.5L/100 km16.2mpg US19.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 26.4L/100 km8.9mpg US10.7mpg UK | 22.4L/100 km10.5mpg US12.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 12.7L/100 km18.5mpg US22.2mpg UK | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.5s Calculated | 12.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 246hp/t184kW/t112hp/1000 lb Calculated | 244hp/t182kW/t111hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 303Nm/t203lb-ft/ton Calculated | 302Nm/t202lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 621km386mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,998cc366cu in | 5,998cc366cu in |
| Length | 5,307mm209in | 4,806mm189in |
| Width | 1,937mm76in | 1,944mm77in |
| Height | 1,479mm58in | 1,404mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 3,065mm121in | 2,746mm108in |
| Front track | 1,623mm64in | 1,664mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,607mm63in | 1,655mm65in |
| Trunk volume | 475L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 2 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 90L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 338g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bentley Continental Flying Spur Speed 6.0i W12: Power / Torque
- Bentley Continental GT II 6.0 W12: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental Flying SpurSpeed 6.0i W12 | 6,000 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | 6,000 rpm | 1,700 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyContinental Flying SpurSpeed 6.0i W12 | BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.6 s | 4.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.8 s | 4.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.7 s | 14.0 s |
| Top speed | 322 km/h 200 mph | 316 km/h 196 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.4 s | 8.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.7 s | 10.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.5 s | 12.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 199 km/h 123 mph | 188 km/h 117 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental Flying SpurSpeed 6.0i W12 | 610 hp 455 kW |
| BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | 567 hp 423 kW |
Bentley Continental Flying Spur Speed 6.0i W12 has 43 hp more than Bentley Continental GT II 6.0 W12.
The biggest power difference is between Bentley Continental GT II 6.0 W12 and Bentley Continental Flying Spur Speed 6.0i W12: 43 hp (32 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental Flying SpurSpeed 6.0i W12 | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft |
| BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental Flying SpurSpeed 6.0i W12 | 2,475 kg 5,456 lb |
| BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | 2,320 kg 5,115 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental Flying SpurSpeed 6.0i W12 | 322 km/h 200 mph |
| BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | 316 km/h 196 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental Flying SpurSpeed 6.0i W12 | 4.8 s |
| BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | 4.5 s |
Although Bentley Continental Flying Spur Speed 6.0i W12 has more power, Bentley Continental GT II 6.0 W12 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Bentley Continental GT II 6.0 W12 and Bentley Continental Flying Spur Speed 6.0i W12: 0.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental Flying SpurSpeed 6.0i W12 | 246 hp/t 184 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
| BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | 244 hp/t 182 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental Flying SpurSpeed 6.0i W12 | 610 hp 455 kW | 4.8 s | 322 km/h 200 mph |
| BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | 567 hp 423 kW | 4.5 s | 316 km/h 196 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental Flying SpurSpeed 6.0i W12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyContinental Flying SpurSpeed 6.0i W12 | BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 610 hp 455 kW | 567 hp 423 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.8 s | 4.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 322 km/h 200 mph | 316 km/h 196 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,475 kg 5,456 lb | 2,320 kg 5,115 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 14.5 L/100 km 16.2 mpg US 19.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 621 km 386 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 338 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 475 L 16.8 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 246 hp/t 184 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 244 hp/t 182 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Continental GT II 6.0 W12 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.5 L/100 km16.2 mpg US19.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 25.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 40.84 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,175 L575 US gal478 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,806 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Continental Flying Spur Speed 6.0i W12
- Has 43 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Bentley Continental GT II 6.0 W12
- Is 155 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























