Bentley Bentayga
Car comparison
Bentley Bentayga 6.0 TSI W12vsJeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) · Facelift 2017 Trackhawk 6.2 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) · Facelift 2017
Trackhawk 6.2 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Bentley Bentayga 6.0 TSI W12
- Fastest top speed301 km/h187 mph
- Highest torque900 Nm664 lb-ft
- Lightest2,440 kg5,379 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption13.1 L/100 km18.0 mpg US21.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption19.0 L/100 km12.4 mpg US14.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range649 km403 mi
- Best performance score86/100
- Best economy score72/100
Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 Trackhawk 6.2 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.7 s
- Most powerful710 hp529 kW
- Best power-to-weight286 hp/t213 kW/t3.5 kg/hp
- Largest trunk800 L
- Best overall score87/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 608hp453kW | 710hp529kW |
| Torque | 900Nm664lb-ft | 868Nm640lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,440kg5,379lb | 2,483kg5,474lb |
| Gross weight | 3,250kg7,165lb | 2,993kg6,598lb |
| Top speed | 301 km/h 187 mph | 289 km/h 180 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 64.0s99% target: 298 km/h / 185 mph Calculated | 52.8s99% target: 286 km/h / 178 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.1s | 3.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.6s Calculated | 11.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.9s Calculated | 3.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 13.1L/100 km18mpg US21.6mpg UK | 17.1L/100 km13.8mpg US16.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 19L/100 km12.4mpg US14.9mpg UK | 25.4L/100 km9.3mpg US11.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK | 12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.0s Calculated | 11.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 249hp/t186kW/t113hp/1000 lb Calculated | 286hp/t213kW/t130hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 369Nm/t247lb-ft/ton Calculated | 350Nm/t234lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 649km403mi Calculated | 544km338mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,950cc363cu in | 6,166cc376cu in |
| Length | 5,140mm202in | 4,846mm191in |
| Width | 1,998mm79in | 1,954mm77in |
| Height | 1,742mm69in | 1,749mm69in |
| Wheelbase | 2,995mm118in | 2,915mm115in |
| Front track | 1,689mm66in | 1,669mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,693mm67in | 1,661mm65in |
| Ground clearance | - | 210mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 484L | 800L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,689L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 93L |
| CO2 emissions | 296g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bentley Bentayga 6.0 TSI W12: Power / Torque
- Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 Trackhawk 6.2 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,350-4,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 4,800 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.9 s | 3.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.1 s | 3.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.6 s | 11.5 s |
| Top speed | 301 km/h 187 mph | 289 km/h 180 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 1.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.3 s | 5.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.9 s | 7.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.1 s | 9.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.0 s | 11.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 195 km/h 121 mph | 200 km/h 124 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | 608 hp 453 kW |
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8 | 710 hp 529 kW |
Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 Trackhawk 6.2 V8 has 102 hp more than Bentley Bentayga 6.0 TSI W12.
The biggest power difference is between Bentley Bentayga 6.0 TSI W12 and Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 Trackhawk 6.2 V8: 102 hp (76 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | 900 Nm 664 lb-ft |
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8 | 868 Nm 640 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | 2,440 kg 5,379 lb |
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8 | 2,483 kg 5,474 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | 301 km/h 187 mph |
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8 | 289 km/h 180 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | 4.1 s |
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8 | 3.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 Trackhawk 6.2 V8 and Bentley Bentayga 6.0 TSI W12: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK |
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8 | 17.1 L/100 km 13.8 mpg US 16.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Bentley Bentayga 6.0 TSI W12 and Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 Trackhawk 6.2 V8: 4.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | 249 hp/t 186 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp |
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8 | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | 649 km 403 mi |
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8 | 544 km 338 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | 608 hp 453 kW | 4.1 s | 301 km/h 187 mph |
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8 | 710 hp 529 kW | 3.7 s | 289 km/h 180 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 |
| 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8 |
| 17.1 L/100 km 13.8 mpg US 16.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Bentley Bentayga 6.0 TSI W12 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK | 4.1 s |
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8 | 17.1 L/100 km 13.8 mpg US 16.5 mpg UK | 3.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | 249 hp/t 186 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK |
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8 | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 17.1 L/100 km 13.8 mpg US 16.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 608 hp 453 kW | 710 hp 529 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 900 Nm 664 lb-ft | 868 Nm 640 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.1 s | 3.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 301 km/h 187 mph | 289 km/h 180 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,440 kg 5,379 lb | 2,483 kg 5,474 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK | 17.1 L/100 km 13.8 mpg US 16.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 649 km 403 mi | 544 km 338 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 296 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 484 L 17.1 cu ft | 800 L 28.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 249 hp/t 186 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Bentayga 6.0 TSI W12 | Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 Trackhawk 6.2 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.1 L/100 km18 mpg US21.6 mpg UK | 17.1 L/100 km13.8 mpg US16.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 22.93 LC100 km | 29.93 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 36.89 LC100 mi | 48.16 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,965 L519 US gal432 UK gal | 2,565 L678 US gal564 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,439 LC/year | 4,489 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Bentayga 6.0 TSI W12
- Has 32 Nm more
- Is 43 kg lighter
- Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 4.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 104 km (65 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 Trackhawk 6.2 V8
- Has 102 hp more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 37 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 316 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























