Bentley Bentayga
Car comparison
Bentley Bentayga 6.0 TSI W12vsBentley Bentayga EWB 4.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBentley Bentayga EWB
4.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Bentley Bentayga 6.0 TSI W12
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.1 s
- Fastest top speed301 km/h187 mph
- Most powerful608 hp453 kW
- Highest torque900 Nm664 lb-ft
- Lightest2,440 kg5,379 lb
- Best power-to-weight249 hp/t186 kW/t4.0 kg/hp
- Largest trunk484 L
- Best overall score84/100
- Best performance score86/100
Bentley Bentayga EWB 4.0 V8
- Lowest combined fuel consumption12.0 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption16.5 L/100 km14.3 mpg US17.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range708 km440 mi
- Best economy score75/100
- Best practicality score81/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | BentleyBentayga EWB4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 608hp453kW | 550hp410kW |
| Torque | 900Nm664lb-ft | 770Nm568lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,440kg5,379lb | 2,514kg5,542lb |
| Gross weight | 3,250kg7,165lb | 3,250kg7,165lb |
| Top speed | 301 km/h 187 mph | 290 km/h 180 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 63.8s99% target: 298 km/h / 185 mph Calculated | 73.2s99% target: 287 km/h / 178 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.1s | 4.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.6s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.9s Calculated | 4.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 13.1L/100 km18mpg US21.6mpg UK | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 19L/100 km12.4mpg US14.9mpg UK | 16.5L/100 km14.3mpg US17.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.0s Calculated | 12.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 249hp/t186kW/t113hp/1000 lb Calculated | 219hp/t163kW/t99hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 369Nm/t247lb-ft/ton Calculated | 306Nm/t205lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 649km403mi Calculated | 708km440mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,950cc363cu in | 3,996cc244cu in |
| Length | 5,140mm202in | 5,305mm209in |
| Width | 1,998mm79in | 1,998mm79in |
| Height | 1,742mm69in | 1,739mm68in |
| Wheelbase | 2,995mm118in | 3,175mm125in |
| Front track | 1,689mm66in | - |
| Rear track | 1,693mm67in | - |
| Trunk volume | 484L | 380L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 85L |
| CO2 emissions | 296g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bentley Bentayga 6.0 TSI W12: Power / Torque
- Bentley Bentayga EWB 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,350-4,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| BentleyBentayga EWB4.0 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 2,000-4,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | BentleyBentayga EWB4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.9 s | 4.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.1 s | 4.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.6 s | 15.0 s |
| Top speed | 301 km/h 187 mph | 290 km/h 180 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.3 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.9 s | 8.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.1 s | 10.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.0 s | 12.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 195 km/h 121 mph | 185 km/h 115 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | 608 hp 453 kW |
| BentleyBentayga EWB4.0 V8 | 550 hp 410 kW |
Bentley Bentayga 6.0 TSI W12 has 58 hp more than Bentley Bentayga EWB 4.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Bentley Bentayga EWB 4.0 V8 and Bentley Bentayga 6.0 TSI W12: 58 hp (43 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | 900 Nm 664 lb-ft |
| BentleyBentayga EWB4.0 V8 | 770 Nm 568 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | 2,440 kg 5,379 lb |
| BentleyBentayga EWB4.0 V8 | 2,514 kg 5,542 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | 301 km/h 187 mph |
| BentleyBentayga EWB4.0 V8 | 290 km/h 180 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | 4.1 s |
| BentleyBentayga EWB4.0 V8 | 4.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Bentley Bentayga 6.0 TSI W12 and Bentley Bentayga EWB 4.0 V8: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK |
| BentleyBentayga EWB4.0 V8 | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Bentley Bentayga EWB 4.0 V8 and Bentley Bentayga 6.0 TSI W12: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | 249 hp/t 186 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp |
| BentleyBentayga EWB4.0 V8 | 219 hp/t 163 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | 649 km 403 mi |
| BentleyBentayga EWB4.0 V8 | 708 km 440 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | 608 hp 453 kW | 4.1 s | 301 km/h 187 mph |
| BentleyBentayga EWB4.0 V8 | 550 hp 410 kW | 4.6 s | 290 km/h 180 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BentleyBentayga EWB4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 |
| 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| BentleyBentayga EWB4.0 V8 |
| 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Bentley Bentayga EWB 4.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK | 4.1 s |
| BentleyBentayga EWB4.0 V8 | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | 249 hp/t 186 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK |
| BentleyBentayga EWB4.0 V8 | 219 hp/t 163 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | BentleyBentayga EWB4.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 608 hp 453 kW | 550 hp 410 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 900 Nm 664 lb-ft | 770 Nm 568 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.1 s | 4.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 301 km/h 187 mph | 290 km/h 180 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,440 kg 5,379 lb | 2,514 kg 5,542 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 649 km 403 mi | 708 km 440 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 296 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 484 L 17.1 cu ft | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 249 hp/t 186 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 219 hp/t 163 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Bentayga 6.0 TSI W12 | Bentley Bentayga EWB 4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.1 L/100 km18 mpg US21.6 mpg UK | 12 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 22.93 LC100 km | 21.00 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 36.89 LC100 mi | 33.80 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,965 L519 US gal432 UK gal | 1,800 L476 US gal396 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,439 LC/year | 3,150 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Bentayga 6.0 TSI W12
- Has 58 hp more
- Has 130 Nm more
- Is 74 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 30 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 104 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Bentley Bentayga EWB 4.0 V8
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 59 km (37 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























