Bentley Bentayga EWB
Car comparison
Bentley Bentayga EWB 4.0 V8vsMercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 600 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz GLS (X167)
GLS 600 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Bentley Bentayga EWB 4.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.6 s
- Fastest top speed290 km/h180 mph
- Highest torque770 Nm568 lb-ft
- Lightest2,514 kg5,542 lb
- Best power-to-weight219 hp/t163 kW/t4.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption12.0 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK
- Best overall score82/100
- Best performance score83/100
- Best economy score75/100
Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 600 V8
- Most powerful558 hp416 kW
- Best estimated range750 km466 mi
- Largest trunk520 L
- Best practicality score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyBentayga EWB4.0 V8 | Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 600 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 550hp410kW | 558hp416kW |
| Torque | 770Nm568lb-ft | 730Nm538lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,514kg5,542lb | 2,785kg6,140lb |
| Gross weight | 3,250kg7,165lb | 3,250kg7,165lb |
| Top speed | 290 km/h 180 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 73.2s99% target: 287 km/h / 178 mph Calculated | 72.9s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.6s | 4.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.0s Calculated | 18.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.4s Calculated | 4.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.5L/100 km14.3mpg US17.1mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 12.6s Calculated | 13.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 219hp/t163kW/t99hp/1000 lb Calculated | 200hp/t149kW/t91hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 306Nm/t205lb-ft/ton Calculated | 262Nm/t175lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 708km440mi Calculated | 750km466mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,996cc244cu in | 3,982cc243cu in |
| Length | 5,305mm209in | 5,205mm205in |
| Width | 1,998mm79in | 2,030mm80in |
| Height | 1,739mm68in | 1,838mm72in |
| Wheelbase | 3,175mm125in | 3,135mm123in |
| Front track | - | 1,699mm67in |
| Rear track | - | 1,723mm68in |
| Trunk volume | 380L | 520L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 90L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 273g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bentley Bentayga EWB 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 600 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga EWB4.0 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 2,000-4,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 600 V8 | 6,000-6,500 rpm | 2,500-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyBentayga EWB4.0 V8 | Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 600 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.4 s | 4.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.6 s | 4.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.0 s | 18.5 s |
| Top speed | 290 km/h 180 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.3 s | 8.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.7 s | 11.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.6 s | 13.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 185 km/h 115 mph | 174 km/h 108 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga EWB4.0 V8 | 550 hp 410 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 600 V8 | 558 hp 416 kW |
Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 600 V8 has 8 hp more than Bentley Bentayga EWB 4.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Bentley Bentayga EWB 4.0 V8 and Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 600 V8: 8 hp (6 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga EWB4.0 V8 | 770 Nm 568 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 600 V8 | 730 Nm 538 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga EWB4.0 V8 | 2,514 kg 5,542 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 600 V8 | 2,785 kg 6,140 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga EWB4.0 V8 | 290 km/h 180 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 600 V8 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga EWB4.0 V8 | 4.6 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 600 V8 | 4.9 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 600 V8 has more power, Bentley Bentayga EWB 4.0 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Bentley Bentayga EWB 4.0 V8 and Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 600 V8: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga EWB4.0 V8 | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 600 V8 | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga EWB4.0 V8 | 219 hp/t 163 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 600 V8 | 200 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga EWB4.0 V8 | 708 km 440 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 600 V8 | 750 km 466 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga EWB4.0 V8 | 550 hp 410 kW | 4.6 s | 290 km/h 180 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 600 V8 | 558 hp 416 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga EWB4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 600 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga EWB4.0 V8 |
| 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 600 V8 |
| 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Bentley Bentayga EWB 4.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga EWB4.0 V8 | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 600 V8 | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga EWB4.0 V8 | 219 hp/t 163 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 600 V8 | 200 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyBentayga EWB4.0 V8 | Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 600 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 550 hp 410 kW | 558 hp 416 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 770 Nm 568 lb-ft | 730 Nm 538 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.6 s | 4.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 290 km/h 180 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,514 kg 5,542 lb | 2,785 kg 6,140 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 708 km 440 mi | 750 km 466 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 273 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | 520 L 18.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 219 hp/t 163 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 200 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Bentayga EWB 4.0 V8 | Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 600 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK | 12 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.00 LC100 km | 21.00 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 33.80 LC100 mi | 33.80 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,800 L476 US gal396 UK gal | 1,800 L476 US gal396 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,150 LC/year | 3,150 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Bentayga EWB 4.0 V8
- Has 40 Nm more
- Is 271 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 30 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 600 V8
- Has 8 hp more
- Has 42 km (26 mi) more estimated range
- Has 140 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























