Bentley Bentayga
Car comparison
Bentley Bentayga 6.0 TSI W12vsMercedes-Benz GLS (X166) AMG GLS 63
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz GLS (X166)
AMG GLS 63
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Bentley Bentayga 6.0 TSI W12
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.1 s
- Fastest top speed301 km/h187 mph
- Most powerful608 hp453 kW
- Highest torque900 Nm664 lb-ft
- Lightest2,440 kg5,379 lb
- Best power-to-weight249 hp/t186 kW/t4.0 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK
- Best performance score86/100
Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166) AMG GLS 63
- Lowest combined fuel consumption12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23.0 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption15.8 L/100 km14.9 mpg US17.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions288 g/km
- Best estimated range813 km505 mi
- Largest trunk680 L
- Best overall score85/100
- Best economy score74/100
- Best practicality score93/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)AMG GLS 63 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 608hp453kW | 585hp436kW |
| Torque | 900Nm664lb-ft | 760Nm561lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,440kg5,379lb | 2,505kg5,523lb |
| Gross weight | 3,250kg7,165lb | 3,290kg7,253lb |
| Top speed | 301 km/h 187 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 64.0s99% target: 298 km/h / 185 mph Calculated | 60.5s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.1s | 4.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.6s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.9s Calculated | 4.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 13.1L/100 km18mpg US21.6mpg UK | 12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 19L/100 km12.4mpg US14.9mpg UK | 15.8L/100 km14.9mpg US17.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK | 10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.0s Calculated | 12.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 249hp/t186kW/t113hp/1000 lb Calculated | 234hp/t174kW/t106hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 369Nm/t247lb-ft/ton Calculated | 303Nm/t203lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 649km403mi Calculated | 813km505mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,950cc363cu in | 5,461cc333cu in |
| Length | 5,140mm202in | 5,130mm202in |
| Width | 1,998mm79in | 1,934mm76in |
| Height | 1,742mm69in | 1,850mm73in |
| Wheelbase | 2,995mm118in | 3,075mm121in |
| Front track | 1,689mm66in | 1,655mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,693mm67in | 1,675mm66in |
| Trunk volume | 484L | 680L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 2,300L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 100L |
| CO2 emissions | 296g/km | 288g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bentley Bentayga 6.0 TSI W12: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166) AMG GLS 63: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,350-4,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)AMG GLS 63 | 5,500 rpm | 1,750-5,250 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)AMG GLS 63 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.9 s | 4.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.1 s | 4.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.6 s | 16.3 s |
| Top speed | 301 km/h 187 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.3 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.9 s | 8.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.1 s | 10.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.0 s | 12.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 195 km/h 121 mph | 180 km/h 112 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | 608 hp 453 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)AMG GLS 63 | 585 hp 436 kW |
Bentley Bentayga 6.0 TSI W12 has 23 hp more than Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166) AMG GLS 63.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166) AMG GLS 63 and Bentley Bentayga 6.0 TSI W12: 23 hp (17 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | 900 Nm 664 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)AMG GLS 63 | 760 Nm 561 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | 2,440 kg 5,379 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)AMG GLS 63 | 2,505 kg 5,523 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | 301 km/h 187 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)AMG GLS 63 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | 4.1 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)AMG GLS 63 | 4.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Bentley Bentayga 6.0 TSI W12 and Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166) AMG GLS 63: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)AMG GLS 63 | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166) AMG GLS 63 and Bentley Bentayga 6.0 TSI W12: 0.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | 249 hp/t 186 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)AMG GLS 63 | 234 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | 649 km 403 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)AMG GLS 63 | 813 km 505 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | 608 hp 453 kW | 4.1 s | 301 km/h 187 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)AMG GLS 63 | 585 hp 436 kW | 4.6 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)AMG GLS 63 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 |
| 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)AMG GLS 63 |
| 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Bentley Bentayga 6.0 TSI W12 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK | 4.1 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)AMG GLS 63 | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | 249 hp/t 186 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)AMG GLS 63 | 234 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)AMG GLS 63 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 608 hp 453 kW | 585 hp 436 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 900 Nm 664 lb-ft | 760 Nm 561 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.1 s | 4.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 301 km/h 187 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,440 kg 5,379 lb | 2,505 kg 5,523 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 649 km 403 mi | 813 km 505 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 296 g/km | 288 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 484 L 17.1 cu ft | 680 L 24.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 249 hp/t 186 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 234 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Bentayga 6.0 TSI W12 | Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166) AMG GLS 63 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.1 L/100 km18 mpg US21.6 mpg UK | 12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 22.93 LC100 km | 21.53 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 36.89 LC100 mi | 34.64 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,965 L519 US gal432 UK gal | 1,845 L487 US gal406 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,439 LC/year | 3,229 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Bentayga 6.0 TSI W12
- Has 23 hp more
- Has 140 Nm more
- Is 65 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 41 km/h (25 mph) higher top speed
- Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166) AMG GLS 63
- Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 164 km (102 mi) more estimated range
- Has 196 L more trunk volume
- Emits 8 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























