Car comparison

Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5vsAUDI Q6 45 TFSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Lynk & Co 09

EM-P 2.0TD T5

254 hp1969 ccHybridAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2022-2023
VS

AUDI Q6

45 TFSI

265 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2022-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    230 km/h
    143 mph
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    1.0 L/100 km
    247.6 mpg US
    297.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    7,368 km
    4,579 mi
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best performance score
    54/100
  • Best economy score
    100/100

AUDI Q6 45 TFSI

  • Most powerful
    265 hp
    198 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    2,280 kg
    5,027 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    116 hp/t
    87 kW/t
    8.6 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    286 L
  • Best practicality score
    78/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelLynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5AUDIQ645 TFSI
Power
254hp189kW
265hp198kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
2,470kg5,445lb
2,280kg5,027lb
Gross weight-
2,780kg6,129lb
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
207 km/h129 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
81.5s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
90.8s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.9s
7.6s
0-200 km/h
29.2s
Calculated
46.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.6s
Calculated
7.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
1L/100 km247.6mpg US297.3mpg UK
9.3L/100 km25.4mpg US30.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.2s
Calculated
15.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
103hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb
Calculated
116hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
142Nm/t95lb-ft/ton
Calculated
175Nm/t117lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
7,368km4,579mi
Calculated
756km470mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
5,042mm199in
5,099mm201in
Width
1,977mm78in
2,014mm79in
Height
1,780mm70in
1,784mm70in
Wheelbase
2,984mm117in
2,980mm117in
Front track
1,680mm66in
1,704mm67in
Rear track
1,684mm66in
1,721mm68in
Ground clearance
190mm7in
-
Trunk volume
264L
286L
Max trunk volume-
2,398L
Doors
5
5
Seats
6
6
Fuel tank
70L
70L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricLynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5AUDIQ645 TFSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.6 s
7.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.9 s
7.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
29.2 s
46.0 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
207 km/h129 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.2 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.0 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.1 s
10.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.9 s
13.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.2 s
15.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
157 km/h
97 mph
144 km/h
90 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
254 hp
189 kW
AUDIQ645 TFSI
265 hp
198 kW

AUDI Q6 45 TFSI has 11 hp more than Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5.

The biggest power difference is between Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5 and AUDI Q6 45 TFSI: 11 hp (8 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
AUDIQ645 TFSI
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
2,470 kg
5,445 lb
AUDIQ645 TFSI
2,280 kg
5,027 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
230 km/h
143 mph
AUDIQ645 TFSI
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
207 km/h129 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T55.9 s
AUDIQ645 TFSI7.6 s

Although AUDI Q6 45 TFSI has more power, Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5 and AUDI Q6 45 TFSI: 1.7 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
1.0 L/100 km
247.6 mpg US
297.3 mpg UK
AUDIQ645 TFSI
9.3 L/100 km
25.4 mpg US
30.5 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5 and AUDI Q6 45 TFSI: 8.3 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
103 hp/t
77 kW/t
9.7 kg/hp
AUDIQ645 TFSI
116 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
7,368 km
4,579 mi
AUDIQ645 TFSI
756 km
470 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
254 hp
189 kW
5.9 s
230 km/h
143 mph
AUDIQ645 TFSI
265 hp
198 kW
7.6 s
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
207 km/h129 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
264 L
9.3 cu ft
Length
5,042 mm
198.5 in
Height
1,780 mm
70.1 in
AUDIQ645 TFSI
Power
265 hp
198 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
207 km/h129 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
286 L
10.1 cu ft
Length
5,099 mm
200.7 in
Height
1,784 mm
70.2 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
1.0 L/100 km
247.6 mpg US
297.3 mpg UK
AUDIQ645 TFSI
Power
265 hp
198 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
207 km/h129 mph
9.3 L/100 km
25.4 mpg US
30.5 mpg UK

Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
1.0 L/100 km
247.6 mpg US
297.3 mpg UK
5.9 s
AUDIQ645 TFSI
9.3 L/100 km
25.4 mpg US
30.5 mpg UK
7.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
103 hp/t
77 kW/t
9.7 kg/hp
1.0 L/100 km
247.6 mpg US
297.3 mpg UK
AUDIQ645 TFSI
116 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
9.3 L/100 km
25.4 mpg US
30.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleLynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5AUDIQ645 TFSI
Power
254 hp
189 kW
265 hp
198 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.9 s
7.6 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
207 km/h129 mph
Lightness
2,470 kg
5,445 lb
2,280 kg
5,027 lb
Fuel consumption
1.0 L/100 km
247.6 mpg US
297.3 mpg UK
9.3 L/100 km
25.4 mpg US
30.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
264 L
9.3 cu ft
Length
5,042 mm
198.5 in
Height
1,780 mm
70.1 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
286 L
10.1 cu ft
Length
5,099 mm
200.7 in
Height
1,784 mm
70.2 in
Range score
7,368 km
4,579 mi
756 km
470 mi
Trunk score
264 L
9.3 cu ft
286 L
10.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
103 hp/t
77 kW/t
9.7 kg/hp
116 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleLynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5AUDI Q6 45 TFSI
Consumption1 L/100 km247.6 mpg US297.3 mpg UK9.3 L/100 km25.4 mpg US30.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km1.66 LC100 km16.21 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi2.68 LC100 mi26.08 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used143 L38 US gal31 UK gal1,389 L367 US gal306 UK gal
Annual fuel cost249.38 LC/year2,431 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5

  • Is 1.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 8.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 6,612 km (4,109 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

AUDI Q6 45 TFSI

  • Has 11 hp more
  • Has 50 Nm more
  • Is 190 kg lighter
  • Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 22 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5
AUDI Q6 45 TFSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

EM-P 2.0TD T5
45 TFSI
VS
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5vsAUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI
45 TFSI
45 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ645 TFSIvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202045 TFSI
EM-P 2.0TD T5
2.0 TSI
VS
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5vsSeatTarraco2.0 TSI
EM-P 2.0TD T5
T 2.0
VS
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5vsPorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2021T 2.0
45 TFSI
45 TDI
VS
AUDIQ645 TFSIvsAUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI
EM-P 2.0TD T5
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5vsMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
45 TFSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ645 TFSIvsAUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
EM-P 2.0TD T5
2.0 TSI
VS
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5vsVolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI
45 TFSI
45 TDI V6
VS
AUDIQ645 TFSIvsAUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6
45 TFSI
50 71 kWh
VS
AUDIQ645 TFSIvsAUDIe-tron50 71 kWh
EM-P 2.0TD T5
2.0i
VS
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5vsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
45 TFSI
45 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ645 TFSIvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TFSI
Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5 vs AUDI Q6 45 TFSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster