Car comparison

AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TDIvsMazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

AUDI Q3 II (F3)

40 TDI

200 hp1968 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2020-2024
VS

Mazda CX-60

2.5 e-Skyactiv

192 hp2488 ccHybridAWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedSUV2022-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TDI

  • Fastest top speed
    225 km/h
    140 mph
  • Most powerful
    200 hp
    149 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,660 kg
    3,660 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    120 hp/t
    90 kW/t
    8.3 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    530 L
  • Best overall score
    63/100
  • Best performance score
    52/100
  • Best practicality score
    85/100

Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.8 s
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    1.5 L/100 km
    156.8 mpg US
    188.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    3,333 km
    2,071 mi
  • Best economy score
    100/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDIMazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
Power
200hp149kW
192hp143kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
261Nm193lb-ft
Curb weight
1,660kg3,660lb
2,072kg4,568lb
Gross weight
2,250kg4,960lb
2,667kg5,880lb
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
82.3s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
64.2s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.3s
5.8s
0-200 km/h
34.5s
Calculated
38.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.9s
Calculated
5.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
1.5L/100 km156.8mpg US188.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
15.3s
Calculated
14.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
120hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb
Calculated
93hp/t69kW/t42hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
241Nm/t161lb-ft/ton
Calculated
126Nm/t84lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,074km667mi
Calculated
3,333km2,071mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,968cc120cu in
2,488cc152cu in
Length
4,484mm177in
4,745mm187in
Width
1,849mm73in
1,890mm74in
Height
1,616mm64in
1,685mm66in
Wheelbase
2,680mm106in
2,870mm113in
Front track
1,584mm62in
1,640mm65in
Rear track
1,576mm62in
1,645mm65in
Ground clearance-
175mm7in
Trunk volume
530L
477L
Max trunk volume-
1,726L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
58L
50L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TDIMazda CX-60 2.5 e-SkyactivPowerTorque
  • AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TDI: Power / Torque
  • Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI3,600-4,100 rpm1,750-3,500 rpm4,350 rpm
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv6,000 rpm-6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDIMazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.9 s
5.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.3 s
5.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
34.5 s
38.7 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.2 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
5.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.9 s
9.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.8 s
11.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.3 s
14.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
150 km/h
93 mph
155 km/h
96 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI
200 hp
149 kW
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
192 hp
143 kW

AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TDI has 8 hp more than Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv.

The biggest power difference is between Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv and AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TDI: 8 hp (6 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
261 Nm
193 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI
1,660 kg
3,660 lb
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
2,072 kg
4,568 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI
225 km/h
140 mph
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI7.3 s
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv5.8 s

Although AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TDI has more power, Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv and AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TDI: 1.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
1.5 L/100 km
156.8 mpg US
188.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv and AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TDI: 3.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI
120 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
93 hp/t
69 kW/t
10.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI
1,074 km
667 mi
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
3,333 km
2,071 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI
200 hp
149 kW
7.3 s
225 km/h
140 mph
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
192 hp
143 kW
5.8 s
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
530 L
18.7 cu ft
Length
4,484 mm
176.5 in
Height
1,616 mm
63.6 in
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h5.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
477 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
4,745 mm
186.8 in
Height
1,685 mm
66.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h5.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
1.5 L/100 km
156.8 mpg US
188.3 mpg UK

AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
7.3 s
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
1.5 L/100 km
156.8 mpg US
188.3 mpg UK
5.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI
120 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
93 hp/t
69 kW/t
10.8 kg/hp
1.5 L/100 km
156.8 mpg US
188.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDIMazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
Power
200 hp
149 kW
192 hp
143 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
261 Nm
193 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.3 s
5.8 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Lightness
1,660 kg
3,660 lb
2,072 kg
4,568 lb
Fuel consumption
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
1.5 L/100 km
156.8 mpg US
188.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
530 L
18.7 cu ft
Length
4,484 mm
176.5 in
Height
1,616 mm
63.6 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
477 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
4,745 mm
186.8 in
Height
1,685 mm
66.3 in
Range score
1,074 km
667 mi
3,333 km
2,071 mi
Trunk score
530 L
18.7 cu ft
477 L
16.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
120 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
93 hp/t
69 kW/t
10.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TDIMazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv
Consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK1.5 L/100 km156.8 mpg US188.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km9.45 LC100 km2.63 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi15.21 LC100 mi4.22 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used810 L214 US gal178 UK gal225 L59 US gal49 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,418 LC/year393.75 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TDI

  • Has 8 hp more
  • Has 139 Nm more
  • Is 412 kg lighter
  • Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 28 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 53 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv

  • Is 1.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 3.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 2,259 km (1,404 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TDI
Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

40 TDI
2.0 TDI
VS
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDIvsAUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TDI
2.5 e-Skyactiv
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
VS
MazdaCX-602.5 e-SkyactivvsMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
40 TDI
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDIvsAUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TFSI
2.5 e-Skyactiv
1.5i P300e
VS
MazdaCX-602.5 e-SkyactivvsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20201.5i P300e
40 TDI
40 TDI
VS
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDIvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI
2.5 e-Skyactiv
2.0 TSI
VS
MazdaCX-602.5 e-SkyactivvsCupraFormentor2.0 TSI
40 TDI
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDIvsAUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
2.5 e-Skyactiv
350h
VS
MazdaCX-602.5 e-SkyactivvsLexusNX II (AZ20)350h
40 TDI
40 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDIvsAUDIQ2Facelift 202040 TFSI
2.5 e-Skyactiv
2.0 TSI
VS
MazdaCX-602.5 e-SkyactivvsVolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI
40 TDI
45 TDI
VS
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDIvsAUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI
2.5 e-Skyactiv
GLA 220d
VS
MazdaCX-602.5 e-SkyactivvsMercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d
AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TDI vs Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv - car comparison - FastVsFaster