Car comparison

AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TDIvsFord Puma · Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

AUDI Q3 II (F3)

40 TDI

193 hp1968 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2024-2025
VS

Ford Puma · Facelift 2024

ST 1.0 EcoBoost

170 hp999 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2024-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TDI

  • Fastest top speed
    218 km/h
    135 mph
  • Most powerful
    193 hp
    144 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Best estimated range
    829 km
    515 mi
  • Largest trunk
    530 L
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best performance score
    50/100
  • Best practicality score
    85/100

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.4 s
  • Lightest
    1,315 kg
    2,899 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    129 hp/t
    96 kW/t
    7.7 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.5 L/100 km
    36.2 mpg US
    43.5 mpg UK
  • Best economy score
    89/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDIFordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
Power
193hp144kW
170hp127kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
248Nm183lb-ft
Curb weight
1,660kg3,660lb
1,315kg2,899lb
Gross weight
2,250kg4,960lb
1,850kg4,079lb
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
To 99% top speed
83.8s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph
Calculated
72.8s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.6s
7.4s
0-200 km/h
40.4s
Calculated
45.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.2s
Calculated
7.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.5s
Calculated
15.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
116hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb
Calculated
129hp/t96kW/t59hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
241Nm/t161lb-ft/ton
Calculated
189Nm/t126lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
829km515mi
Calculated
646km402mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,968cc120cu in
999cc61cu in
Length
4,484mm177in
4,226mm166in
Width
1,856mm73in
-
Height
1,616mm64in
1,533mm60in
Wheelbase
2,680mm106in
2,588mm102in
Front track
1,584mm62in
1,567mm62in
Rear track
1,576mm62in
1,523mm60in
Ground clearance-
152mm6in
Trunk volume
530L
456L
Max trunk volume
1,525L
1,216L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
58L
42L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TDIFord Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoostPowerTorque
  • AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TDI: Power / Torque
  • Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI3,500-4,200 rpm1,750-3,250 rpm4,450 rpm
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost5,750 rpm3,000 rpm6,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDIFordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.2 s
7.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.6 s
7.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
40.4 s
45.0 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.1 s
10.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.0 s
12.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.5 s
15.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
147 km/h
91 mph
148 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI
193 hp
144 kW
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
170 hp
127 kW

AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TDI has 23 hp more than Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost.

The biggest power difference is between Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost and AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TDI: 23 hp (17 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
248 Nm
183 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI
1,660 kg
3,660 lb
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
1,315 kg
2,899 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI
218 km/h
135 mph
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
210 km/h
130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI7.6 s
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost7.4 s

Although AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TDI has more power, Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost and AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TDI: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost and AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TDI: 0.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI
116 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI
829 km
515 mi
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
646 km
402 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI
193 hp
144 kW
7.6 s
218 km/h
135 mph
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
170 hp
127 kW
7.4 s
210 km/h
130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI
Power
193 hp
144 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
530 L
18.7 cu ft
Length
4,484 mm
176.5 in
Height
1,616 mm
63.6 in
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,226 mm
166.4 in
Height
1,533 mm
60.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI
Power
193 hp
144 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK

AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
7.6 s
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
7.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI
116 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDIFordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
Power
193 hp
144 kW
170 hp
127 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
248 Nm
183 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.6 s
7.4 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
Lightness
1,660 kg
3,660 lb
1,315 kg
2,899 lb
Fuel consumption
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
530 L
18.7 cu ft
Length
4,484 mm
176.5 in
Height
1,616 mm
63.6 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,226 mm
166.4 in
Height
1,533 mm
60.4 in
Range score
829 km
515 mi
646 km
402 mi
Trunk score
530 L
18.7 cu ft
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
116 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TDIFord Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost
Consumption7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.25 LC100 km11.38 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi19.71 LC100 mi18.31 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal975 L258 US gal214 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,838 LC/year1,706 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TDI

  • Has 23 hp more
  • Has 152 Nm more
  • Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 182 km (113 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 74 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost

  • Is 345 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TDI
Ford Puma ST 1.0 EcoBoost
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

40 TDI
2.0 TDI
VS
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDIvsAUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TDI
ST 1.0 EcoBoost
1.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostvsFordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
40 TDI
2.0 TDI
VS
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDIvsAUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TDI
ST 1.0 EcoBoost
1.5 TSI
VS
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostvsCupraTerramar1.5 TSI
40 TDI
2.0 TDI
VS
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDIvsAUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TDI
ST 1.0 EcoBoost
1.5 TSI
VS
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostvsVolkswagenTayron II1.5 TSI
40 TDI
40 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDIvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TFSI
ST 1.0 EcoBoost
1.6 T-GDI
VS
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostvsHyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI
40 TDI
40 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDIvsAUDIQ2Facelift 202040 TFSI
ST 1.0 EcoBoost
1.5 TSI
VS
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostvsVolkswagenTiguan III1.5 TSI
40 TDI
40 TDI
VS
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDIvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI
ST 1.0 EcoBoost
GLB 220
VS
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostvsMercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220
AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TDI vs Ford Puma · Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost - car comparison - FastVsFaster